Mobile Food Tracking Apps: Do They Provoke Disordered Eating Behavior? Results of a Longitudinal Study.

IF 1.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Psychology in Russia-State of the Art Pub Date : 2024-03-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.11621/pir.2024.0104
Margarita S Aslanova, Amina S Valieva, Nataliya V Bogacheva, Anastasia M Skupova
{"title":"Mobile Food Tracking Apps: Do They Provoke Disordered Eating Behavior? Results of a Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Margarita S Aslanova, Amina S Valieva, Nataliya V Bogacheva, Anastasia M Skupova","doi":"10.11621/pir.2024.0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some studies connect the popularity of food-tracking apps to an increase in restrictive eating and other disordered eating behaviors and find those apps harmful for psychological well-being, but there is a lack of empirical studies, especially of Russian samples.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the connection between disordered eating symptoms, psychological well-being, and the use of a mobile food-tracking application.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The participants were 26 women aged 18-30 (<i>M</i> = 21.96; <i>SD</i> = 3.33); 24 completed the study. During the pre-test, the participants completed the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (Van Strien et al., 1985), the Eating Attitude Test (Skugarevskii, 2007), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Ma et al., 2023), the Situation Inventory of Body-Image Dysphoria (Baranskaia & Tataurova, 2011), and a socio-demographic survey with additional questions related to food tracking, weight, and disordered eating. The experimental group was then tasked with tracking their food consumption with a mobile app for a month. The test battery was completed again immediately after the experiment ended, and for a third time one month later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The comparative analysis showed a decrease in anxiety throughout the study, with a tendency-level increase in depressive symptoms by the end of the experiment. Contrary to expectations, emotional and external eating decreased during the experiment, while restrictive eating did not change. However, the risk of general disordered eating behavior increased one month after the experiment. The correlations between psychological well-being and eating behavior changed during the study. Immediately after the experiment, more correlations between eating behavior, body dissatisfaction, anxiety, and depression emerged, while at the later cutoff, correlations with depression and anxiety became insignificant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study had mixed results, contradicting some previous research. Both emotional and external eating decreased along with anxiety levels; however, general disordered eating symptoms increased after food tracking.</p>","PeriodicalId":44621,"journal":{"name":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","volume":"17 1","pages":"67-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2024.0104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Some studies connect the popularity of food-tracking apps to an increase in restrictive eating and other disordered eating behaviors and find those apps harmful for psychological well-being, but there is a lack of empirical studies, especially of Russian samples.

Objective: To examine the connection between disordered eating symptoms, psychological well-being, and the use of a mobile food-tracking application.

Design: The participants were 26 women aged 18-30 (M = 21.96; SD = 3.33); 24 completed the study. During the pre-test, the participants completed the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (Van Strien et al., 1985), the Eating Attitude Test (Skugarevskii, 2007), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Ma et al., 2023), the Situation Inventory of Body-Image Dysphoria (Baranskaia & Tataurova, 2011), and a socio-demographic survey with additional questions related to food tracking, weight, and disordered eating. The experimental group was then tasked with tracking their food consumption with a mobile app for a month. The test battery was completed again immediately after the experiment ended, and for a third time one month later.

Results: The comparative analysis showed a decrease in anxiety throughout the study, with a tendency-level increase in depressive symptoms by the end of the experiment. Contrary to expectations, emotional and external eating decreased during the experiment, while restrictive eating did not change. However, the risk of general disordered eating behavior increased one month after the experiment. The correlations between psychological well-being and eating behavior changed during the study. Immediately after the experiment, more correlations between eating behavior, body dissatisfaction, anxiety, and depression emerged, while at the later cutoff, correlations with depression and anxiety became insignificant.

Conclusion: The study had mixed results, contradicting some previous research. Both emotional and external eating decreased along with anxiety levels; however, general disordered eating symptoms increased after food tracking.

移动食物追踪应用程序:它们会引发饮食紊乱行为吗?一项纵向研究的结果。
背景:一些研究将食物追踪应用程序的流行与限制性饮食和其他饮食失调行为的增加联系起来,并发现这些应用程序对心理健康有害,但缺乏实证研究,尤其是对俄罗斯样本的研究:目的:研究饮食失调症状、心理健康与使用手机食物追踪应用程序之间的联系:参与者为 26 名女性,年龄在 18-30 岁之间(男 = 21.96;女 = 3.33),其中 24 人完成了研究。在预测试期间,参与者完成了荷兰饮食行为问卷(Van Strien 等人,1985 年)、饮食态度测试(Skugarevskii,2007 年)、医院焦虑和抑郁量表(Ma 等人,2023 年)、身体形象障碍情况量表(Baranskaia 和 Tataurova,2011 年)以及社会人口调查,其中还包括与食物追踪、体重和饮食失调有关的其他问题。然后,实验组被要求在一个月内使用手机应用软件追踪他们的食物消耗量。实验结束后立即再次完成测试,一个月后进行第三次测试:对比分析表明,在整个研究过程中,焦虑情绪有所下降,而在实验结束时,抑郁症状有上升趋势。与预期相反,实验期间情绪化进食和外源性进食有所减少,而限制性进食没有变化。然而,实验结束一个月后,出现一般饮食失调行为的风险增加了。在研究过程中,心理健康与饮食行为之间的相关性发生了变化。实验刚结束时,饮食行为、身体不满意度、焦虑和抑郁之间出现了更多的相关性,而在实验结束后,抑郁和焦虑之间的相关性变得不明显:这项研究的结果好坏参半,与之前的一些研究相矛盾。情绪化进食和外源性进食都会随着焦虑水平的降低而减少;然而,在食物追踪后,一般的饮食失调症状会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychology in Russia-State of the Art
Psychology in Russia-State of the Art PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2008, the Russian Psychological Society''s Journal «Psychology in Russia: State of the Art» publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognitive, clinical, developmental, social, neuropsychology, psychophysiology, psychology of labor and ergonomics, and methodology of psychological science. Journal''s list of authors comprises prominent scientists, practitioners and experts from leading Russian universities, research institutions, state ministries and private practice. Addressing current challenges of psychology, it also reviews developments in novel areas such as security, sport, and art psychology, as well as psychology of negotiations, cyberspace and virtual reality. The journal builds upon theoretical foundations laid by the works of Vygotsky, Luria and other Russian scientists whose works contributed to shaping the psychological science worldwide, and welcomes international submissions which make major contributions across the range of psychology, especially appreciating the ones conducted in the paradigm of the Russian psychological tradition. It enjoys a wide international readership and features reports of empirical studies, book reviews and theoretical contributions, which aim to further our understanding of psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信