The role of early orthotic intervention in the management of post-traumatic elbow contractures: Study protocol for phase II double-blinded randomised controlled trial.

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
Germaine Sim, Jennifer Fleming, Celeste Glasgow
{"title":"The role of early orthotic intervention in the management of post-traumatic elbow contractures: Study protocol for phase II double-blinded randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Germaine Sim, Jennifer Fleming, Celeste Glasgow","doi":"10.1177/17589983241292827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Restoration of full elbow extension following trauma is difficult and influenced by the injury profile, surgeon preference, patient and environmental factors. The literature suggests that orthotic interventions are effective in improving contractures when movement plateaus despite normal therapeutic interventions. It is not known if extension orthotic intervention is more superior to standard treatment regardless of when it is commenced. The literature lacks patient-reported considerations to contracture management using elbow orthoses.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This protocol describes a Phase II double blinded randomised controlled feasibility trial (RCT) and mixed methods study, aimed to examine outcome with extension in an orthotic intervention group (OG) versus control (CG). All participants will undergo six weekly therapy sessions, which include a standardised therapeutic program. OG participants will be provided with an additional extension orthosis and the outcome is assessed according to the change in elbow extension motion after 6 weeks of intervention. Data will be collected via questionnaires, logbooks, feedback forms, and semi-structured interviews at baseline and final assessments for descriptive statistical analysis. Under the guidance of a statistician, all quantitative data will be evaluated using the appropriate parametric or non-parametric analyses to evaluate for systematic differences between groups. Preliminary extension gains are used to determine the final sample size required to achieve adequate power for a full-scaled RCT. Interview data on OG participants will be qualitatively analysed using the \"five-factorial dimensions of adherence\" framework to identify key differences in the influencers between adherent or non-adherent groups.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ANZCTR ACTRN12619001402134p.</p>","PeriodicalId":43971,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"17589983241292827"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17589983241292827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Restoration of full elbow extension following trauma is difficult and influenced by the injury profile, surgeon preference, patient and environmental factors. The literature suggests that orthotic interventions are effective in improving contractures when movement plateaus despite normal therapeutic interventions. It is not known if extension orthotic intervention is more superior to standard treatment regardless of when it is commenced. The literature lacks patient-reported considerations to contracture management using elbow orthoses.

Methods and analysis: This protocol describes a Phase II double blinded randomised controlled feasibility trial (RCT) and mixed methods study, aimed to examine outcome with extension in an orthotic intervention group (OG) versus control (CG). All participants will undergo six weekly therapy sessions, which include a standardised therapeutic program. OG participants will be provided with an additional extension orthosis and the outcome is assessed according to the change in elbow extension motion after 6 weeks of intervention. Data will be collected via questionnaires, logbooks, feedback forms, and semi-structured interviews at baseline and final assessments for descriptive statistical analysis. Under the guidance of a statistician, all quantitative data will be evaluated using the appropriate parametric or non-parametric analyses to evaluate for systematic differences between groups. Preliminary extension gains are used to determine the final sample size required to achieve adequate power for a full-scaled RCT. Interview data on OG participants will be qualitatively analysed using the "five-factorial dimensions of adherence" framework to identify key differences in the influencers between adherent or non-adherent groups.

Trial registration number: ANZCTR ACTRN12619001402134p.

早期矫形干预在治疗创伤后肘关节挛缩中的作用:II期双盲随机对照试验研究方案。
背景:外伤后恢复肘关节完全伸展非常困难,并受到损伤情况、外科医生偏好、患者和环境因素的影响。文献表明,当正常治疗干预后运动仍处于停滞状态时,矫形干预可有效改善挛缩。目前尚不清楚无论何时开始延伸矫形干预是否比标准治疗更有优势。文献中缺乏患者对使用肘部矫形器治疗挛缩的考虑:本方案描述了一项第二阶段双盲随机对照可行性试验(RCT)和混合方法研究,旨在检查矫形器干预组(OG)与对照组(CG)的伸展效果。所有参与者每周将接受六次治疗,其中包括标准化的治疗方案。OG组参与者将获得额外的伸展矫形器,根据干预6周后肘关节伸展运动的变化来评估疗效。在基线和最终评估时,将通过问卷、日志、反馈表和半结构式访谈收集数据,进行描述性统计分析。在统计学家的指导下,将使用适当的参数或非参数分析对所有定量数据进行评估,以评价组间的系统性差异。初步扩展收益用于确定最终样本量,以达到全面 RCT 所需的足够功率。将使用 "依从性的五因素维度 "框架对 OG 参与者的访谈数据进行定性分析,以确定依从或非依从组之间影响因素的关键差异:ANZCTR ACTRN12619001402134p.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hand Therapy
Hand Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信