Clinical effectiveness of picture exchange communication system (PECS) on 5- to 7-year-old children's oral health.

IF 2.3 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
A Arafa, O Sheiko, A Jameel, H A Fansa
{"title":"Clinical effectiveness of picture exchange communication system (PECS) on 5- to 7-year-old children's oral health.","authors":"A Arafa, O Sheiko, A Jameel, H A Fansa","doi":"10.1007/s40368-024-00965-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the impact of the picture exchange communication system (PECS) on oral hygiene motivation and practices in healthy children aged five to seven years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 160 healthy children aged five to seven years were included in this study. At the first visit, the participants' guardians were asked to answer a questionnaire focussing on the sociodemographic, and the oral hygiene habits of the participants. All participants received a clinical examination to assess their dental caries experience using the ICDAS score, gingival condition using the gingival index (GI), and the amount of accumulated dental plaque using the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TQHI), followed by comprehensive explanation of the proper oral hygiene protocol. The participants were randomly divided into two equal groups; the PECS group and the control group. The participants were re-assessed after 6 months. The collected data were statistically analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 23 at a p-value ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By the end of the follow-up period, the PECS group reported significantly greater adherence to regular tooth brushing (p = 0.006) with a frequency higher than twice per day (p < 0.000) and no need for parental motivation (p < 0.001), and had significantly lower mean GI and TQHI scores (p < 0.000). Most of the participants' guardians reported that the PECS cards were useful for use and that they would continue to use them 66/76 (86%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PECS was found to be effective in motivating children to adhere to proper tooth-brushing practices, as reflected by improvements in their oral health status and gingival condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":47603,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-024-00965-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the impact of the picture exchange communication system (PECS) on oral hygiene motivation and practices in healthy children aged five to seven years.

Methods: A total of 160 healthy children aged five to seven years were included in this study. At the first visit, the participants' guardians were asked to answer a questionnaire focussing on the sociodemographic, and the oral hygiene habits of the participants. All participants received a clinical examination to assess their dental caries experience using the ICDAS score, gingival condition using the gingival index (GI), and the amount of accumulated dental plaque using the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TQHI), followed by comprehensive explanation of the proper oral hygiene protocol. The participants were randomly divided into two equal groups; the PECS group and the control group. The participants were re-assessed after 6 months. The collected data were statistically analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 23 at a p-value ≤ 0.05.

Results: By the end of the follow-up period, the PECS group reported significantly greater adherence to regular tooth brushing (p = 0.006) with a frequency higher than twice per day (p < 0.000) and no need for parental motivation (p < 0.001), and had significantly lower mean GI and TQHI scores (p < 0.000). Most of the participants' guardians reported that the PECS cards were useful for use and that they would continue to use them 66/76 (86%).

Conclusion: The PECS was found to be effective in motivating children to adhere to proper tooth-brushing practices, as reflected by improvements in their oral health status and gingival condition.

图片交流沟通系统 (PECS) 对 5 至 7 岁儿童口腔健康的临床效果。
目的:评估图片交流沟通系统(PECS)对五至七岁健康儿童口腔卫生动机和实践的影响:本研究共纳入 160 名 5 至 7 岁的健康儿童。在首次就诊时,受试者的监护人被要求回答一份调查问卷,内容主要涉及受试者的社会人口学和口腔卫生习惯。所有参与者都接受了临床检查,使用 ICDAS 评分评估他们的龋齿情况,使用牙龈指数(GI)评估牙龈状况,使用 Turesky Modified of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index(TQHI)评估牙菌斑的累积量,然后全面讲解正确的口腔卫生方案。参与者被随机分为两组:PECS 组和对照组。6 个月后对参与者进行再次评估。收集到的数据使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)第 23 版进行统计分析,P 值≤ 0.05:结果:在随访期结束时,PECS 组对每天刷牙两次以上(P = 0.006)的坚持率明显高于 PECS 组(P = 0.05):儿童口腔健康状况和牙龈状况的改善表明,PECS 能有效激励儿童坚持正确的刷牙方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The aim and scope of European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) is to promote research in all aspects of dentistry for children, including interceptive orthodontics and studies on children and young adults with special needs. The EAPD focuses on the publication and critical evaluation of clinical and basic science research related to children. The EAPD will consider clinical case series reports, followed by the relevant literature review, only where there are new and important findings of interest to Paediatric Dentistry and where details of techniques or treatment carried out and the success of such approaches are given.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信