Medical influence: what does success look like?

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524241297695
Diane Wintz, Kelly Wright, Kathryn B Schaffer
{"title":"Medical influence: what does success look like?","authors":"Diane Wintz, Kelly Wright, Kathryn B Schaffer","doi":"10.1177/26323524241297695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social media influencers have revolutionized information, gaining viewers, retention, and interest with short videos. Medical teams could potentially benefit from this medium for educating patients. Defining success in this endeavor remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We are a surgeon-nurse team that sought to promote our messages on social media to gain viewers and interest in our website.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An educational podcast focusing on end-of-life discussions was linked to social media platforms, including <i>Instagram</i> and <i>TikTok</i>, to gain views on our website.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven podcast episodes were produced and published over a 3-month period, between November 2023 and January 2024. The podcast episodes were promoted to \"similar clients\" based on internal algorithms by a podcast streaming service, <i>Spotify</i>. The promotion provided by <i>Spotify</i> and website views were compared to responses evident by other social media posts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 3 months of publishing podcast episodes on <i>Spotify</i>, with free publicity, our podcast gained 10,400 promotions, 486 listeners, 49 followers, and approximately 1200 random website views. In comparison, the podcast content garnered more than 50,000 video clip views on <i>TikTok</i> and <i>Instagram</i>, after funding these brief video promotions. <i>TikTok</i> and <i>Instagram</i> both charged $20 or more per promotion. Paid promotion opportunities resulted in no website visits or podcast followers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our own experience with social media promotion was inadequate in generating interest in our content. The authors would encourage other teams to be strategic with paid promotions and to consider engaging a marketing expert to improve the potential for mass interest in content and promotional efficiency. Additionally, based on these findings, the authors would appreciate more transparency in the algorithms behind successful promotions to better understand \"what success looks like\" for medical messaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"18 ","pages":"26323524241297695"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241297695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social media influencers have revolutionized information, gaining viewers, retention, and interest with short videos. Medical teams could potentially benefit from this medium for educating patients. Defining success in this endeavor remains unclear.

Objective: We are a surgeon-nurse team that sought to promote our messages on social media to gain viewers and interest in our website.

Design: An educational podcast focusing on end-of-life discussions was linked to social media platforms, including Instagram and TikTok, to gain views on our website.

Methods: Eleven podcast episodes were produced and published over a 3-month period, between November 2023 and January 2024. The podcast episodes were promoted to "similar clients" based on internal algorithms by a podcast streaming service, Spotify. The promotion provided by Spotify and website views were compared to responses evident by other social media posts.

Results: After 3 months of publishing podcast episodes on Spotify, with free publicity, our podcast gained 10,400 promotions, 486 listeners, 49 followers, and approximately 1200 random website views. In comparison, the podcast content garnered more than 50,000 video clip views on TikTok and Instagram, after funding these brief video promotions. TikTok and Instagram both charged $20 or more per promotion. Paid promotion opportunities resulted in no website visits or podcast followers.

Conclusion: Our own experience with social media promotion was inadequate in generating interest in our content. The authors would encourage other teams to be strategic with paid promotions and to consider engaging a marketing expert to improve the potential for mass interest in content and promotional efficiency. Additionally, based on these findings, the authors would appreciate more transparency in the algorithms behind successful promotions to better understand "what success looks like" for medical messaging.

医疗影响力:成功是什么样的?
背景:社交媒体上的 "有影响力的人 "为信息带来了革命性的变化,他们通过短视频赢得了观众、留存率和兴趣。医疗团队有可能从这种教育患者的媒介中获益。但成功的定义尚不明确:我们是一个外科医生护士团队,希望在社交媒体上推广我们的信息,以获得观众并对我们的网站产生兴趣:设计:将以生命末期讨论为重点的教育播客与社交媒体平台(包括 Instagram 和 TikTok)相链接,以获得我们网站的浏览量:方法:在 2023 年 11 月至 2024 年 1 月的 3 个月期间,制作并发布了 11 集播客。播客流媒体服务商 Spotify 根据内部算法将这些播客推广给 "类似客户"。将 Spotify 提供的推广和网站浏览量与其他社交媒体帖子的明显反应进行了比较:在 Spotify 上发布播客剧集并进行免费宣传 3 个月后,我们的播客获得了 10,400 次推广、486 位听众、49 位追随者和大约 1200 次随机网站浏览量。相比之下,在资助了这些简短的视频推广后,播客内容在 TikTok 和 Instagram 上获得了 50,000 多次视频剪辑浏览量。TikTok 和 Instagram 的每次推广费用都在 20 美元以上。付费推广机会没有带来任何网站访问量或播客追随者:我们在社交媒体推广方面的经验不足以引起人们对我们内容的兴趣。作者鼓励其他团队对付费推广采取战略性态度,并考虑聘请营销专家来提高大众对内容的兴趣潜力和推广效率。此外,基于这些发现,作者希望成功推广背后的算法更加透明,以便更好地了解医疗信息 "成功的样子"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信