Small volume fluid resuscitation and supplementation with 20% albumin versus buffered crystalloids in adults with septic shock: A protocol for a randomised feasibility trial.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Pub Date : 2024-10-18 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1177/17511437241292194
Jonathan Bannard-Smith, Rinaldo Bellomo, Tim W Felton, Daniel F McAuley, Gareth B Kitchen, Catherine Fullwood, Alexander Thompson, Paul M Dark
{"title":"Small volume fluid resuscitation and supplementation with 20% albumin versus buffered crystalloids in adults with septic shock: A protocol for a randomised feasibility trial.","authors":"Jonathan Bannard-Smith, Rinaldo Bellomo, Tim W Felton, Daniel F McAuley, Gareth B Kitchen, Catherine Fullwood, Alexander Thompson, Paul M Dark","doi":"10.1177/17511437241292194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluid therapy is universally administered in the management of patients with sepsis, however excessive cumulative fluid balance has been shown to result in worse outcomes. Hyperoncotic albumin results in both lower fluid volumes and early cumulative fluid balance, and may reduce short-term mortality in patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single centre, open label, feasibility trial; patients with early septic shock will be randomly allocated either 20% albumin for resuscitation and daily supplementation, versus buffered crystalloids alone for all fluid therapy. The intervention period will last 7 days, with follow up points at ICU and hospital discharge, and 90 days after randomisation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Primary outcome measures including recruitment rate, intervention adherence, data completeness and safety will constitute objective evidence of feasibility, according to pre-specified thresholds. Secondary outcomes will include mortality and healthcare utilisation at 90 days, alongside other physiological and patient centred outcomes to inform the design of a future effectiveness trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study will rigorously test the feasibility of conducting a future trial to test both the clinical and cost-effectiveness of hyperoncotic albumin in patients with early septic shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"25 4","pages":"419-426"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437241292194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fluid therapy is universally administered in the management of patients with sepsis, however excessive cumulative fluid balance has been shown to result in worse outcomes. Hyperoncotic albumin results in both lower fluid volumes and early cumulative fluid balance, and may reduce short-term mortality in patients with septic shock.

Methods: In this single centre, open label, feasibility trial; patients with early septic shock will be randomly allocated either 20% albumin for resuscitation and daily supplementation, versus buffered crystalloids alone for all fluid therapy. The intervention period will last 7 days, with follow up points at ICU and hospital discharge, and 90 days after randomisation.

Objectives: Primary outcome measures including recruitment rate, intervention adherence, data completeness and safety will constitute objective evidence of feasibility, according to pre-specified thresholds. Secondary outcomes will include mortality and healthcare utilisation at 90 days, alongside other physiological and patient centred outcomes to inform the design of a future effectiveness trial.

Conclusion: This study will rigorously test the feasibility of conducting a future trial to test both the clinical and cost-effectiveness of hyperoncotic albumin in patients with early septic shock.

脓毒性休克成人患者的小容量液体复苏和补充 20% 白蛋白与缓冲晶体液:随机可行性试验方案。
背景:在脓毒症患者的治疗过程中,液体疗法是普遍采用的治疗方法,但事实证明,过多的累积液体平衡会导致更糟糕的结果。高渗性白蛋白可降低液体量和早期累积液体平衡,并可降低脓毒性休克患者的短期死亡率:在这项单中心、开放标签、可行性试验中,早期脓毒性休克患者将随机分配到 20% 的白蛋白用于复苏和每日补充,或仅用缓冲晶体液进行所有液体治疗。干预期为 7 天,在重症监护室和出院时以及随机分配后 90 天进行随访:根据预先规定的阈值,包括招募率、干预依从性、数据完整性和安全性在内的主要结果指标将构成可行性的客观证据。次要结果将包括 90 天内的死亡率和医疗利用率,以及其他生理和以患者为中心的结果,以便为未来有效性试验的设计提供信息:本研究将严格测试未来开展试验的可行性,以检验高渗性白蛋白治疗早期脓毒性休克患者的临床效果和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信