Revisiting the radiological signs for the first metatarsal pronation assessment.

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Daniel Y Wu, Eddy K F Lam
{"title":"Revisiting the radiological signs for the first metatarsal pronation assessment.","authors":"Daniel Y Wu, Eddy K F Lam","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.511.BJO-2024-0116.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The first metatarsal pronation deformity of hallux valgus feet is widely recognized. However, its assessment relies mostly on 3D standing CT scans. Two radiological signs, the first metatarsal round head (RH) and inferior tuberosity position (ITP), have been described, but are seldom used to aid in diagnosis. This study was undertaken to determine the reliability and validity of these two signs for a more convenient and affordable preoperative assessment and postoperative comparison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 200 feet were randomly selected from the radiograph archives of a foot and ankle clinic. An anteroposterior view of both feet was taken while standing on the same x-ray platform. The intermetatarsal angle (IMA), metatarsophalangeal angle (MPA), medial sesamoid position, RH, and ITP signs were assessed for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 127 feet with an IMA > 9°. Both RH and ITP severities correlated significantly with IMA severity. RH and ITP were also significantly associated with each other, and the pronation deformities of these feet are probably related to extrinsic factors. There were also feet with discrepancies between their RH and ITP severities, possibly due to intrinsic torsion of the first metatarsal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both RH and ITP are reliable first metatarsal pronation signs correlating to the metatarsus primus varus deformity of hallux valgus feet. They should be used more for preoperative and postoperative assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"5 11","pages":"1037-1040"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.511.BJO-2024-0116.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The first metatarsal pronation deformity of hallux valgus feet is widely recognized. However, its assessment relies mostly on 3D standing CT scans. Two radiological signs, the first metatarsal round head (RH) and inferior tuberosity position (ITP), have been described, but are seldom used to aid in diagnosis. This study was undertaken to determine the reliability and validity of these two signs for a more convenient and affordable preoperative assessment and postoperative comparison.

Methods: A total of 200 feet were randomly selected from the radiograph archives of a foot and ankle clinic. An anteroposterior view of both feet was taken while standing on the same x-ray platform. The intermetatarsal angle (IMA), metatarsophalangeal angle (MPA), medial sesamoid position, RH, and ITP signs were assessed for statistical analysis.

Results: There were 127 feet with an IMA > 9°. Both RH and ITP severities correlated significantly with IMA severity. RH and ITP were also significantly associated with each other, and the pronation deformities of these feet are probably related to extrinsic factors. There were also feet with discrepancies between their RH and ITP severities, possibly due to intrinsic torsion of the first metatarsal.

Conclusion: Both RH and ITP are reliable first metatarsal pronation signs correlating to the metatarsus primus varus deformity of hallux valgus feet. They should be used more for preoperative and postoperative assessment.

重新审视第一跖骨前伸评估的放射学标志。
目的:外翻足的第一跖骨前伸畸形已被广泛认可。然而,其评估主要依赖于三维站立 CT 扫描。第一跖骨圆头(RH)和下结节位置(ITP)这两个放射学标志已被描述,但很少用于辅助诊断。本研究旨在确定这两种体征的可靠性和有效性,以便更方便、更经济地进行术前评估和术后对比:方法:从一家足踝诊所的影像档案中随机抽取了 200 只脚。方法:从一家足踝诊所的 X 光片档案中随机抽取 200 只脚,站在同一 X 光平台上拍摄双脚的前胸视图。对跖骨间角(IMA)、跖趾角(MPA)、内侧芝麻状位置、RH和ITP征象进行评估,并进行统计分析:结果:IMA>9°的足有 127 例。RH和ITP的严重程度与IMA的严重程度显著相关。RH和ITP之间也有明显的相关性,这些足的代偿畸形可能与外在因素有关。还有一些足的RH和ITP严重程度不一致,可能是由于第一跖骨的内在扭转:结论:RH和ITP都是可靠的第一跖骨前凸征象,与拇指外翻足的跖骨前凸畸形相关。它们应更多地用于术前和术后评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信