Patient awareness, knowledge, and acceptability of antenatal perineal massage: A single-center cross-sectional study from Saudi Arabia.

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING
European Journal of Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18332/ejm/194962
Saeed Baradwan, Abdulrhman M Banasser, Afaf Tawfiq, Ghaidaa Farouk Hakeem, Alya Alkaff, Bandr Hafedh, Fahad Algreisi, Taliah A Khoja, Abdullatif Sheikh Ibrahim, Alaa Edrees
{"title":"Patient awareness, knowledge, and acceptability of antenatal perineal massage: A single-center cross-sectional study from Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Saeed Baradwan, Abdulrhman M Banasser, Afaf Tawfiq, Ghaidaa Farouk Hakeem, Alya Alkaff, Bandr Hafedh, Fahad Algreisi, Taliah A Khoja, Abdullatif Sheikh Ibrahim, Alaa Edrees","doi":"10.18332/ejm/194962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study assessed the knowledge, awareness, and acceptability of antenatal perineal massage (APM) among pregnant women in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 240 pregnant women who met the predefined inclusion criteria and attended the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, from 1 October to 31 December 2023. Participants answered seven knowledge questions, classified as having good knowledge if they answered ≥4 correctly and poor knowledge if <4 were correct.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most women (46.25%) reported it was their first encounter with APM. Common sources of information included the internet (39.58%), physicians/midwives (7.92%), and friends/family (3.75%). Nearly half (47.5%) had heard of APM, but only 8.75% had practiced it, and 3.75% attended related classes. Only 17.5% knew that APM could be performed by the woman or her partner, while 25.83% knew it should start at 34 weeks, and 17.92% recognized the recommended duration of 5 to 10 minutes daily. Additionally, 22.5%, 15.83%, and 35.42% acknowledged APM's benefits for labor duration, anal sphincter dysfunction, and perineal injuries, respectively. The average knowledge score was 1.39±1.84, with 84.17% classified as having poor knowledge. No significant differences were found between knowledge levels (p>0.05). Low acceptability was noted, with only 58% of patients and 37% of their partners willing to engage in APM. No significant differences in acceptability were found between poor and good knowledge groups (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study revealed low awareness, poor knowledge, and weak acceptability of APM among pregnant patients. Targeted education for patients and healthcare providers could enhance knowledge and improve maternal-fetal health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":"8 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/194962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study assessed the knowledge, awareness, and acceptability of antenatal perineal massage (APM) among pregnant women in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 240 pregnant women who met the predefined inclusion criteria and attended the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, from 1 October to 31 December 2023. Participants answered seven knowledge questions, classified as having good knowledge if they answered ≥4 correctly and poor knowledge if <4 were correct.

Results: Most women (46.25%) reported it was their first encounter with APM. Common sources of information included the internet (39.58%), physicians/midwives (7.92%), and friends/family (3.75%). Nearly half (47.5%) had heard of APM, but only 8.75% had practiced it, and 3.75% attended related classes. Only 17.5% knew that APM could be performed by the woman or her partner, while 25.83% knew it should start at 34 weeks, and 17.92% recognized the recommended duration of 5 to 10 minutes daily. Additionally, 22.5%, 15.83%, and 35.42% acknowledged APM's benefits for labor duration, anal sphincter dysfunction, and perineal injuries, respectively. The average knowledge score was 1.39±1.84, with 84.17% classified as having poor knowledge. No significant differences were found between knowledge levels (p>0.05). Low acceptability was noted, with only 58% of patients and 37% of their partners willing to engage in APM. No significant differences in acceptability were found between poor and good knowledge groups (p>0.05).

Conclusions: The study revealed low awareness, poor knowledge, and weak acceptability of APM among pregnant patients. Targeted education for patients and healthcare providers could enhance knowledge and improve maternal-fetal health outcomes.

患者对产前会阴按摩的认识、知识和接受程度:沙特阿拉伯单中心横断面研究。
简介:本研究评估了沙特阿拉伯孕妇对产前会阴按摩(APM)的了解、认识和接受程度:本研究评估了沙特阿拉伯孕妇对产前会阴按摩(APM)的了解、认识和接受程度:这项横断面研究纳入了符合预定纳入标准的 240 名孕妇,她们于 2023 年 10 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日在沙特阿拉伯吉达费萨尔国王专科医院和研究中心妇产科就诊。参与者回答了七个知识问题,如果回答正确率≥4,则被归类为 "知识良好";如果回答错误,则被归类为 "知识较差":大多数妇女(46.25%)称这是她们第一次接触杀伤人员地雷。常见的信息来源包括互联网(39.58%)、医生/助产士(7.92%)和朋友/家人(3.75%)。近一半(47.5%)的人听说过 APM,但只有 8.75% 的人实践过,3.75% 的人参加过相关课程。只有 17.5%的人知道产妇或其伴侣可以进行 APM,25.83%的人知道应从 34 周开始,17.92%的人知道建议的持续时间为每天 5 到 10 分钟。此外,分别有 22.5%、15.83% 和 35.42% 的受访者认识到 APM 对产程、肛门括约肌功能障碍和会阴损伤的益处。知识平均分为 1.39±1.84,84.17% 的人属于知识贫乏。不同知识水平之间无明显差异(P>0.05)。接受度较低,仅有 58% 的患者及其 37% 的伴侣愿意接受 APM。知识水平低和知识水平高的人群在接受程度上没有明显差异(P>0.05):研究显示,孕妇对 APM 的认知度低、知识贫乏且接受度低。对患者和医疗服务提供者进行有针对性的教育可增强他们的知识,改善母婴健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信