An evaluation of the Hawthorne effect in a clinical trial of trauma care in Ghana.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Adam Gyedu, Forster Amponsah-Manu, Samuel Mensah, Peter Donkor, Charles Mock
{"title":"An evaluation of the Hawthorne effect in a clinical trial of trauma care in Ghana.","authors":"Adam Gyedu, Forster Amponsah-Manu, Samuel Mensah, Peter Donkor, Charles Mock","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hawthorne effect refers to changes in clinician behavior in response to being observed. It has been minimally evaluated in trauma and surgical research, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the first (control) phase of a randomized clinical trial in Ghana (2020-21). Trained observers were stationed in emergency units in eight non-tertiary hospitals to observe the achievement of key performance indicators (KPI) (KPIs) of trauma care. We hypothesized that the observers' presence would create a Hawthorne effect, resulting in clinicians (doctors, nurses) performing above their usual level, with performance highest immediately after the observers were introduced, and with performance then declining over time toward the usual baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 2067 injured patients. Achievement of 13 out of 16 KPIs declined significantly over the 14 months after the introduction of observers. For example, airway assessment declined from 77% initially to 60% at the end of the phase (p < 0.001). Chest examination declined from 66% to 31% (p < 0.001). Distal pulses checked declined from 45% to 7% (p < 0.001). The slope of decline in KPI achievement ranged from 0.8%/month (mobility assessed) to 15.9%/month (distal pulses checked).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The decline in KPI achievement over time is consistent with the hypothesis that clinicians performed above their usual level just after the observers were introduced, with performance then declining toward the usual baseline. This study is among the first to provide quantitative data on the Hawthorne effect for trauma research in LMICs. These data are useful for the design of future observational studies and clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12410","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hawthorne effect refers to changes in clinician behavior in response to being observed. It has been minimally evaluated in trauma and surgical research, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods: We used data from the first (control) phase of a randomized clinical trial in Ghana (2020-21). Trained observers were stationed in emergency units in eight non-tertiary hospitals to observe the achievement of key performance indicators (KPI) (KPIs) of trauma care. We hypothesized that the observers' presence would create a Hawthorne effect, resulting in clinicians (doctors, nurses) performing above their usual level, with performance highest immediately after the observers were introduced, and with performance then declining over time toward the usual baseline.

Results: We enrolled 2067 injured patients. Achievement of 13 out of 16 KPIs declined significantly over the 14 months after the introduction of observers. For example, airway assessment declined from 77% initially to 60% at the end of the phase (p < 0.001). Chest examination declined from 66% to 31% (p < 0.001). Distal pulses checked declined from 45% to 7% (p < 0.001). The slope of decline in KPI achievement ranged from 0.8%/month (mobility assessed) to 15.9%/month (distal pulses checked).

Conclusions: The decline in KPI achievement over time is consistent with the hypothesis that clinicians performed above their usual level just after the observers were introduced, with performance then declining toward the usual baseline. This study is among the first to provide quantitative data on the Hawthorne effect for trauma research in LMICs. These data are useful for the design of future observational studies and clinical trials.

评估加纳创伤护理临床试验中的霍桑效应。
简介霍桑效应是指临床医生的行为因被观察而发生变化。在创伤和外科研究中,尤其是在中低收入国家(LMICs),对霍桑效应的评估很少:我们使用了加纳一项随机临床试验第一阶段(对照)(2020-21 年)的数据。经过培训的观察员被派驻到八家非三级医院的急诊科,观察创伤护理关键绩效指标(KPI)的实现情况。我们假设,观察员的存在将产生霍桑效应,使临床医生(医生、护士)的工作表现高于其通常水平,观察员一经引入,工作表现立即达到最高水平,然后随着时间的推移,工作表现会向通常的基线下降:我们招募了 2067 名受伤患者。在引入观察员后的 14 个月中,16 项关键绩效指标中有 13 项的完成情况明显下降。例如,气道评估从最初的 77% 下降到阶段结束时的 60%(p 结论:KPI 指标的完成情况随着时间的推移而下降:随着时间的推移,KPI 指标的下降与以下假设相吻合:在引入观察员后,临床医生的表现超过了他们通常的水平,随后表现向通常的基线下降。这项研究是首批为低收入国家创伤研究提供霍桑效应量化数据的研究之一。这些数据对设计未来的观察研究和临床试验很有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信