A causal model for predicting the impact of pharmacotherapy on colorectal surgery outcomes.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Camron Sohn, John Roberts, Edson Jean-Jacques, Richard H Parrish
{"title":"A causal model for predicting the impact of pharmacotherapy on colorectal surgery outcomes.","authors":"Camron Sohn, John Roberts, Edson Jean-Jacques, Richard H Parrish","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence-based principles in enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) demonstrate substantial improvement in patient outcomes. Determining which latent variables predict composite outcomes could refine ERP pharmacotherapy recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using R, pharmacotherapy data were modeled from an existing dataset of adult elective colorectal surgery patients. Primary composite outcome was absence of surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and other in-hospital postoperative complications (POCs). Secondary composite outcome included no postdischarge POCs, hospital length of stay ≤3 days, and no readmission at 7- or 30-days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Variables with greater odds of predicting both positive primary and secondary composite outcomes included prehospital oral iron and oral antibiotic use, postoperative sugammadex and neostigmine use, postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (MME) ≤ 50, and IV fluid stop by postoperative day 2. Preoperative scopolamine patch (OR = 0.29 and CI = -0.19-0.77) and perioperative gabapentin (OR = 0.46 and CI = 0.06-0.83) had lesser odds for both primary and secondary composite outcomes. Ketamine nonanesthetic bolus, ondansetron IV use, and in-hospital enoxaparin use had paradoxical lesser primary but greater odds for secondary composite outcomes. Prehospital oral laxative use (OR = 0.61 and CI = 0.18-1.04) and postoperative dual IV antibiotics (OR = 0.52 and CI = 0.10-0.94) had lesser odds for primary, but not secondary, outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To improve the odds for positive composite outcomes, oral iron and antibiotics, sugammadex and neostigmine, lower MME, and early IV fluid cessation could be considered essential core items, whereas postoperative dual IV antibiotics and epidural anesthesia might be avoided. Additional research needs to clarify the impacts of in-hospital enoxaparin, ketamine nonanesthetic bolus, and ondansetron use on composite patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12387","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence-based principles in enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) demonstrate substantial improvement in patient outcomes. Determining which latent variables predict composite outcomes could refine ERP pharmacotherapy recommendations.

Methods: Using R, pharmacotherapy data were modeled from an existing dataset of adult elective colorectal surgery patients. Primary composite outcome was absence of surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and other in-hospital postoperative complications (POCs). Secondary composite outcome included no postdischarge POCs, hospital length of stay ≤3 days, and no readmission at 7- or 30-days.

Results: Variables with greater odds of predicting both positive primary and secondary composite outcomes included prehospital oral iron and oral antibiotic use, postoperative sugammadex and neostigmine use, postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (MME) ≤ 50, and IV fluid stop by postoperative day 2. Preoperative scopolamine patch (OR = 0.29 and CI = -0.19-0.77) and perioperative gabapentin (OR = 0.46 and CI = 0.06-0.83) had lesser odds for both primary and secondary composite outcomes. Ketamine nonanesthetic bolus, ondansetron IV use, and in-hospital enoxaparin use had paradoxical lesser primary but greater odds for secondary composite outcomes. Prehospital oral laxative use (OR = 0.61 and CI = 0.18-1.04) and postoperative dual IV antibiotics (OR = 0.52 and CI = 0.10-0.94) had lesser odds for primary, but not secondary, outcome.

Conclusion: To improve the odds for positive composite outcomes, oral iron and antibiotics, sugammadex and neostigmine, lower MME, and early IV fluid cessation could be considered essential core items, whereas postoperative dual IV antibiotics and epidural anesthesia might be avoided. Additional research needs to clarify the impacts of in-hospital enoxaparin, ketamine nonanesthetic bolus, and ondansetron use on composite patient outcomes.

预测药物疗法对结直肠手术效果影响的因果模型。
导言:强化康复计划(ERPs)中的循证原则显示患者的治疗效果得到了显著改善。确定哪些潜在变量可预测综合疗效,可完善ERP药物治疗建议:方法:使用 R,从现有的成人选择性结直肠手术患者数据集中建立药物治疗数据模型。主要综合结果是无手术部位感染、静脉血栓栓塞、术后恶心呕吐和其他院内术后并发症(POCs)。次要综合结果包括出院后无并发症、住院时间≤3天、7天或30天后无再入院:预测主要和次要综合结果均为阳性的几率较大的变量包括:院前口服铁剂和口服抗生素、术后使用舒格迈司和新斯的明、术后吗啡毫克当量(MME)≤50、术后第2天停止静脉输液。术前东莨菪碱贴片(OR = 0.29,CI = -0.19-0.77)和围术期加巴喷丁(OR = 0.46,CI = 0.06-0.83)对主要和次要综合结果的影响较小。氯胺酮非麻醉栓、昂丹司琼静脉注射和院内依诺肝素的使用对主要综合结果的影响较小,但对次要综合结果的影响较大。院前口服泻药(OR = 0.61,CI = 0.18-1.04)和术后双重静脉注射抗生素(OR = 0.52,CI = 0.10-0.94)的主要结果几率较低,但次要结果几率较高:结论:为提高阳性综合结果的几率,口服铁剂和抗生素、舒甘马定和新斯的明、降低 MME 和早期停止静脉输液可被视为必要的核心项目,而术后双静脉注射抗生素和硬膜外麻醉则可以避免。其他研究需要明确院内依诺肝素、氯胺酮非麻醉栓和昂丹司琼的使用对患者综合预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信