Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in first line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer - head-to-head comparison with the mFOLFIRINOX regimen.

Q4 Medicine
J Tomášek
{"title":"Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in first line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer - head-to-head comparison with the mFOLFIRINOX regimen.","authors":"J Tomášek","doi":"10.48095/ccko2024331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metastatic pancreatic ductal carcinoma (mPDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines recommend a gemcitabine doublet + nab-paclitaxel (Gem/Nab-P) or a modified FOLFIRINOX regimen (mFOLFIRINOX) as options for systemic chemotherapy. Gemcitabine monotherapy is an option for patients in a worse performance status (PS). Indirect comparisons of pivotal trials with Gem/Nab-P and mFOLFIRINOX vs. gemcitabine monotherapy (PRODIGE-4 and MPACT) indicated longer overall survival (OS) in patients treated with mFOLFIRINOX. However, it should be taken into account that the MPACT study with Gem/Nab-P included patients with an overall worse performance status. A direct comparison of these chemotherapy regimens was lacking. Indirect comparisons from real practice show their comparable effectiveness in terms of OS, progression-free survival and overall response rate. The safety profile is consistently different. The recently published phase II/III GENERATE trial, which directly compared Gem/Nab-P and mFOLFIRINOX in treatment-naïve mPDAC patients, demonstrated significantly longer OS in Gem/Nab-P-treated patients exceeding 17 months with a lower incidence of non-hematologic toxicity. The results sparked a lively discussion at the ESMO 2023 Congress. The comparison of Gem/Nab-P and mFOLFIRINOX was also addressed by prof. Prager in his presentation at the PragueONCO 2024 conference. Prager, who highlighted comparable efficacy of both regimens and better safety of Gem/Nab-P and demonstrated the benefit of Gem/Nab-P also in patients older than 70 years and those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2. It should also be taken into account that the choice of first line treatment determines the therapeutic options in the 2nd line. If the Gem/Nab-P regimen is used in the first line, pegylated liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) can be used in the second line. This regimen demonstrated prolongation of OS compared to 5-FU/LV in phase III study NAPOLI-1. In patients pretreated with the mFOLFIRINOX regimen, gemcitabine monotherapy or Gem/Nab-P can be used in the second line. Early examination of molecular predictive parameters will enable the identification of cases for which appropriate targeted therapy or immunotherapy is available.</p>","PeriodicalId":35565,"journal":{"name":"Klinicka Onkologie","volume":"38 5","pages":"331-334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinicka Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccko2024331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Metastatic pancreatic ductal carcinoma (mPDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines recommend a gemcitabine doublet + nab-paclitaxel (Gem/Nab-P) or a modified FOLFIRINOX regimen (mFOLFIRINOX) as options for systemic chemotherapy. Gemcitabine monotherapy is an option for patients in a worse performance status (PS). Indirect comparisons of pivotal trials with Gem/Nab-P and mFOLFIRINOX vs. gemcitabine monotherapy (PRODIGE-4 and MPACT) indicated longer overall survival (OS) in patients treated with mFOLFIRINOX. However, it should be taken into account that the MPACT study with Gem/Nab-P included patients with an overall worse performance status. A direct comparison of these chemotherapy regimens was lacking. Indirect comparisons from real practice show their comparable effectiveness in terms of OS, progression-free survival and overall response rate. The safety profile is consistently different. The recently published phase II/III GENERATE trial, which directly compared Gem/Nab-P and mFOLFIRINOX in treatment-naïve mPDAC patients, demonstrated significantly longer OS in Gem/Nab-P-treated patients exceeding 17 months with a lower incidence of non-hematologic toxicity. The results sparked a lively discussion at the ESMO 2023 Congress. The comparison of Gem/Nab-P and mFOLFIRINOX was also addressed by prof. Prager in his presentation at the PragueONCO 2024 conference. Prager, who highlighted comparable efficacy of both regimens and better safety of Gem/Nab-P and demonstrated the benefit of Gem/Nab-P also in patients older than 70 years and those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2. It should also be taken into account that the choice of first line treatment determines the therapeutic options in the 2nd line. If the Gem/Nab-P regimen is used in the first line, pegylated liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) can be used in the second line. This regimen demonstrated prolongation of OS compared to 5-FU/LV in phase III study NAPOLI-1. In patients pretreated with the mFOLFIRINOX regimen, gemcitabine monotherapy or Gem/Nab-P can be used in the second line. Early examination of molecular predictive parameters will enable the identification of cases for which appropriate targeted therapy or immunotherapy is available.

吉西他滨/纳布-紫杉醇在晚期胰腺癌一线治疗中的应用--与 mFOLFIRINOX 方案的正面比较。
背景:转移性胰腺导管癌(mPDAC)是最致命的恶性肿瘤之一。欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)指南推荐吉西他滨双药+纳布-紫杉醇(Gem/Nab-P)或改良FOLFIRINOX方案(mFOLFIRINOX)作为全身化疗的选择。吉西他滨单药疗法可用于疗效较差(PS)的患者。Gem/Nab-P和mFOLFIRINOX与吉西他滨单药治疗的间接比较试验(PRODIGE-4和MPACT)显示,接受mFOLFIRINOX治疗的患者总生存期(OS)更长。然而,应该考虑到的是,使用吉西他滨/Nab-P 的 MPACT 研究包括了总体表现较差的患者。这些化疗方案之间缺乏直接比较。实际应用中的间接比较显示,它们在OS、无进展生存期和总体反应率方面的疗效相当。但在安全性方面却始终存在差异。最近发表的 GENERATE II/III 期试验直接比较了 Gem/Nab-P 和 mFOLFIRINOX 对治疗无效的 mPDAC 患者的疗效,结果显示,Gem/Nab-P 治疗患者的 OS 明显更长,超过 17 个月,非血液学毒性发生率更低。这一结果在 ESMO 2023 大会上引发了热烈的讨论。Gem/Nab-P 和 mFOLFIRINOX 的比较也由 Prager 教授在布拉格的演讲中进行了阐述。Prager 教授在布拉格ONCO 2024 大会的发言中也谈到了 Gem/Nab-P 和 mFOLFIRINOX 的比较。Prager 强调两种方案的疗效相当,Gem/Nab-P 的安全性更好,并证明 Gem/Nab-P 方案对 70 岁以上和东部合作肿瘤学组(ECOG)表现状态(PS)为 2 的患者也有益处。如果一线治疗采用 Gem/Nab-P 方案,二线治疗可采用聚乙二醇脂质体伊立替康(nal-IRI)联合 5-氟尿嘧啶和白血病素(5-FU/LV)方案。在III期研究NAPOLI-1中,与5-FU/LV相比,该方案延长了患者的生存期。在接受 mFOLFIRINOX 方案预处理的患者中,吉西他滨单药或 Gem/Nab-P 可用于二线治疗。对分子预测参数的早期检查将有助于确定哪些病例可以进行适当的靶向治疗或免疫治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Klinicka Onkologie
Klinicka Onkologie Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信