Reconstruction of Maxillary Bone Defects With Cellular Bone Matrix Allografts.

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jeffrey S Marschall, Stephen S Davis, Oscar Rysavy, George M Kushner
{"title":"Reconstruction of Maxillary Bone Defects With Cellular Bone Matrix Allografts.","authors":"Jeffrey S Marschall, Stephen S Davis, Oscar Rysavy, George M Kushner","doi":"10.1177/19433875241288138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective Cohort Study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Reconstruction of maxillary bone defects can be completed with vascularized and non-vascularized autografts. Cellular bone matrix allografts (CBMs), which have lineage committed bone cells, has risen as an alternative. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience and to determine the success of CBM based maxillary reconstruction in a variety of clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was designed and implemented using data from subjects who presented to the University of Louisville and were treated with a CBM for maxillary reconstruction from 2019 to 2023. Subjects were excluded if they were not treated with a CBM, data were not complete, or postoperative follow-up time was less than 3 months. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable. To measure the associations between the risk factors and graft success, Fisher's exact test was implemented. A <i>P</i>-value of <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 48 subjects. The mean age of all subjects was 43 ± 24 years. Overall, 42 (87.5%) cases were successful. The perioperative antibiotic administered (<i>P</i> = 0.02), etiology (<i>P</i> = 0.021), and the addition of platelet rich fibrin or autograft as an adjunct influenced CBM success (<i>P</i> = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBMs are a viable option for reconstruction of maxillary bone defects. CBMs may be an alternative to autografts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"19433875241288138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875241288138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: Reconstruction of maxillary bone defects can be completed with vascularized and non-vascularized autografts. Cellular bone matrix allografts (CBMs), which have lineage committed bone cells, has risen as an alternative. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience and to determine the success of CBM based maxillary reconstruction in a variety of clinical scenarios.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was designed and implemented using data from subjects who presented to the University of Louisville and were treated with a CBM for maxillary reconstruction from 2019 to 2023. Subjects were excluded if they were not treated with a CBM, data were not complete, or postoperative follow-up time was less than 3 months. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable. To measure the associations between the risk factors and graft success, Fisher's exact test was implemented. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The sample included 48 subjects. The mean age of all subjects was 43 ± 24 years. Overall, 42 (87.5%) cases were successful. The perioperative antibiotic administered (P = 0.02), etiology (P = 0.021), and the addition of platelet rich fibrin or autograft as an adjunct influenced CBM success (P = 0.039).

Conclusions: CBMs are a viable option for reconstruction of maxillary bone defects. CBMs may be an alternative to autografts.

用细胞骨基质异体移植重建上颌骨缺损。
研究设计回顾性队列研究:上颌骨缺损的重建可通过血管化和非血管化自体移植物完成。细胞骨基质同种异体移植(CBMs)是一种可供选择的替代方法,这种移植材料中的骨细胞已被确定了血统。本研究旨在描述我们的经验,并确定在各种临床情况下基于 CBM 的上颌骨重建的成功率:我们设计并实施了一项回顾性队列研究,使用的数据来自 2019 年至 2023 年期间到路易斯维尔大学就诊并接受 CBM 上颌骨重建治疗的受试者。如果受试者未接受 CBM 治疗、数据不完整或术后随访时间少于 3 个月,则将其排除在外。对每个变量都进行了描述性统计。为了测量风险因素与移植成功率之间的关系,采用了费雪精确检验。P值为结果:样本包括 48 名受试者。所有受试者的平均年龄为 43 ± 24 岁。总体而言,42 例(87.5%)移植成功。围手术期使用的抗生素(P = 0.02)、病因(P = 0.021)以及是否添加富血小板纤维蛋白或自体移植作为辅助手段影响了 CBM 的成功率(P = 0.039):结论:CBM 是重建上颌骨缺损的可行选择。结论:CBM 是重建上颌骨缺损的可行方案,CBM 可以替代自体移植物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信