Inguinal hernia recurrence after laparoscopic mesh removal for chronic pain: a single-center experience with 11 years of practice.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
A M Chaoui, J P Rops, W A van Dijk, M J A Loos, M R M Scheltinga, W A R Zwaans, G D Slooter
{"title":"Inguinal hernia recurrence after laparoscopic mesh removal for chronic pain: a single-center experience with 11 years of practice.","authors":"A M Chaoui, J P Rops, W A van Dijk, M J A Loos, M R M Scheltinga, W A R Zwaans, G D Slooter","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11354-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Up to 12% of patients undergoing minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair may develop chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP), possibly explained by the presence of mesh. Recent studies reported that laparoscopic mesh removal is feasible and safe. However, the risk of a hernia recurrence is unknown. This observational study describes the rate of hernia recurrence and evolution in pain score following laparoscopic mesh removal for CPIP after preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively collected questionnaires and operative notes of consecutive patients undergoing a laparoscopic mesh removal for CPIP in our center of expertise between November 2011 and July 2022 were studied. Pain scores were quantified using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10). The presence of a hernia recurrence was based on patient history and clinical findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 89 patients underwent laparoscopic mesh removal, and data of 83 patients (93% response rate) were available for analysis. Median decrease in pain score (NRS) after mesh removal was 4 (range + 2 to - 9). After a median 4.3 years follow up period, a hernia recurrence was present in 18 patients (21.7%). Of these, eight were symptomatic requiring correction using a Lichtenstein repair with a favorable outcome whereas a wait-and-see approach was successfully followed in the remaining 10 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic mesh removal for CPIP following preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair resulted in an inguinal hernia recurrence in one of five patients requiring remedial surgery in one in ten patients. This knowledge may inform the preoperative counseling process.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11354-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Up to 12% of patients undergoing minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair may develop chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP), possibly explained by the presence of mesh. Recent studies reported that laparoscopic mesh removal is feasible and safe. However, the risk of a hernia recurrence is unknown. This observational study describes the rate of hernia recurrence and evolution in pain score following laparoscopic mesh removal for CPIP after preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

Methods: Prospectively collected questionnaires and operative notes of consecutive patients undergoing a laparoscopic mesh removal for CPIP in our center of expertise between November 2011 and July 2022 were studied. Pain scores were quantified using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10). The presence of a hernia recurrence was based on patient history and clinical findings.

Results: A total of 89 patients underwent laparoscopic mesh removal, and data of 83 patients (93% response rate) were available for analysis. Median decrease in pain score (NRS) after mesh removal was 4 (range + 2 to - 9). After a median 4.3 years follow up period, a hernia recurrence was present in 18 patients (21.7%). Of these, eight were symptomatic requiring correction using a Lichtenstein repair with a favorable outcome whereas a wait-and-see approach was successfully followed in the remaining 10 patients.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic mesh removal for CPIP following preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair resulted in an inguinal hernia recurrence in one of five patients requiring remedial surgery in one in ten patients. This knowledge may inform the preoperative counseling process.

腹腔镜网片切除术治疗慢性疼痛后腹股沟疝复发:单中心 11 年的实践经验。
导言:在接受微创腹股沟疝修补术的患者中,多达 12% 的患者可能会出现术后腹股沟慢性疼痛 (CPIP),这可能是由于网片的存在造成的。最近的研究表明,腹腔镜网片切除术是可行且安全的。然而,疝气复发的风险尚不清楚。这项观察性研究描述了腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后,因 CPIP 而进行腹腔镜网片摘除术后的疝气复发率和疼痛评分变化情况:研究对象为 2011 年 11 月至 2022 年 7 月期间在本专业中心接受腹腔镜网片摘除术治疗 CPIP 的连续患者,并对其进行了前瞻性问卷调查和手术记录。疼痛评分采用数字疼痛评分量表(NRS,0-10)进行量化。疝气复发与否取决于患者的病史和临床表现:共有 89 名患者接受了腹腔镜网片切除术,其中 83 名患者(应答率 93%)的数据可供分析。取出网片后,疼痛评分(NRS)的中位数下降了4分(范围为+2至-9)。经过中位 4.3 年的随访,有 18 名患者(21.7%)的疝气复发。结论:腹腔镜疝气网片摘除术是治疗疝气的最佳方法:结论:腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后进行腹腔镜网片摘除术治疗 CPIP,结果有五分之一的患者腹股沟疝复发,十分之一的患者需要进行补救手术。这一知识可为术前咨询过程提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信