Augmented reality for basic skills training in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Jian Xiong, Xiaoqin Dai, Yuyang Zhang, Xingchao Liu, Xiyuan Zhou
{"title":"Augmented reality for basic skills training in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jian Xiong, Xiaoqin Dai, Yuyang Zhang, Xingchao Liu, Xiyuan Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11387-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Augmented reality (AR) has emerged as a transformative technology in medical education, particularly in training basic laparoscopic skills. Despite its growing applications, the effectiveness of AR in this specific domain remains underexplored, with a lack of standardized assessment frameworks and inconsistent methodologies across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of AR in laparoscopic basic skills training for medical students and junior physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies were selected based on their focus on AR applications in laparoscopic training, involving both randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies. Inclusion criteria focused on medical students and novice surgeons, assessing educational outcomes such as Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) Global, Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) Global, OSATS Specific, Training Time, and Subjective Workload.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies involving 434 participants met the inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed that AR technology significantly improved educational outcomes, with participants achieving higher GOALS and OSATS scores. Specifically, the mean difference for GOALS scores was 2.40 points (95% CI [1.30, 3.50], p < 0.001) and for OSATS scores, 7.71 points (95% CI [3.39, 12.03], p < 0.001). Additionally, AR-assisted training showed a reduction in subjective workload, with a mean decrease of 2.95 points (95% CI [- 4.95, - 0.95], p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate that AR significantly enhances laparoscopic training outcomes, facilitating improved technical skills, efficiency, and learner independence. However, variability in study designs and outcomes limits generalizability. Future research should focus on standardize AR training protocols and evaluate long-term effectiveness to fully leverage AR's potential in surgical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11387-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Augmented reality (AR) has emerged as a transformative technology in medical education, particularly in training basic laparoscopic skills. Despite its growing applications, the effectiveness of AR in this specific domain remains underexplored, with a lack of standardized assessment frameworks and inconsistent methodologies across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of AR in laparoscopic basic skills training for medical students and junior physicians.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies were selected based on their focus on AR applications in laparoscopic training, involving both randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies. Inclusion criteria focused on medical students and novice surgeons, assessing educational outcomes such as Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) Global, Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) Global, OSATS Specific, Training Time, and Subjective Workload.

Results: A total of 12 studies involving 434 participants met the inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed that AR technology significantly improved educational outcomes, with participants achieving higher GOALS and OSATS scores. Specifically, the mean difference for GOALS scores was 2.40 points (95% CI [1.30, 3.50], p < 0.001) and for OSATS scores, 7.71 points (95% CI [3.39, 12.03], p < 0.001). Additionally, AR-assisted training showed a reduction in subjective workload, with a mean decrease of 2.95 points (95% CI [- 4.95, - 0.95], p = 0.003).

Conclusions: The findings indicate that AR significantly enhances laparoscopic training outcomes, facilitating improved technical skills, efficiency, and learner independence. However, variability in study designs and outcomes limits generalizability. Future research should focus on standardize AR training protocols and evaluate long-term effectiveness to fully leverage AR's potential in surgical education.

用于腹腔镜手术基本技能培训的增强现实技术:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:增强现实(AR)已成为医学教育中的一项变革性技术,尤其是在腹腔镜基本技能培训方面。尽管其应用日益广泛,但增强现实技术在这一特定领域的有效性仍未得到充分探索,缺乏标准化的评估框架,不同研究采用的方法也不一致。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估AR在医学生和初级医师腹腔镜基本技能培训中的有效性:我们按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。检索的数据库包括 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science 和 ClinicalTrials.gov。所选研究的重点是腹腔镜培训中的 AR 应用,包括随机对照试验和非随机研究。纳入标准主要针对医学生和外科医生新手,评估的教育成果包括腹腔镜技能全球操作评估(GOALS)全球、技术技能客观结构化评估(OSATS)全球、OSATS特定、培训时间和主观工作量:共有 12 项研究符合纳入标准,涉及 434 名参与者。分析结果表明,AR 技术明显改善了教育成果,参与者获得了更高的 GOALS 和 OSATS 分数。具体来说,GOALS 分数的平均差异为 2.40 分(95% CI [1.30,3.50],p 结论:AR 技术能显著提高腹腔镜手术的成功率:研究结果表明,AR 能显著提高腹腔镜培训效果,促进技术技能、效率和学员独立性的提高。然而,研究设计和结果的差异性限制了其推广性。未来的研究应侧重于标准化 AR 培训方案和评估长期有效性,以充分发挥 AR 在外科教育中的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信