Understanding Hemodynamic Incoherence: Mechanisms, Phenotypes, and Implications for Treatment.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
SHOCK Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002507
Lin Huang, Qiaobin Huang, Weiquan Ma, Hong Yang
{"title":"Understanding Hemodynamic Incoherence: Mechanisms, Phenotypes, and Implications for Treatment.","authors":"Lin Huang, Qiaobin Huang, Weiquan Ma, Hong Yang","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The reversal of microcirculation dysfunction is crucial for assessing the success of shock resuscitation and significantly influences patient prognosis. However hemodynamic incoherence is observed when microcirculatory dysfunction persists despite the restoration of macrocirculatory function post-resuscitation. Recent advancements in technology have enabled bedside assessment of microcirculation in shock patients, allowing for direct visualization of microcirculatory morphology and quantitative evaluation of its functional status. This article reviews the pathophysiological mechanisms that lead to hemodynamic incoherence. It also introduces the current understanding and classification framework for the different phenotypes of hemodynamic incoherence. Existing evidence indicates that the diverse mechanisms leading to microcirculatory disorders result in varied manifestations among patients experiencing hemodynamic incoherence, highlighting the heterogeneity of this population. Some classification frameworks have been proposed to enhance our understanding of these phenotypes. By integrating pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical symptoms, indicators of macrocirculation, microcirculation, tissue metabolism, and biomarkers, we can summarize certain clinical features of phenotypes in hemodynamic incoherence to form a conceptual framework. Additionally, strategies for creating targeted treatments based on different phenotypes require further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21667,"journal":{"name":"SHOCK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHOCK","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The reversal of microcirculation dysfunction is crucial for assessing the success of shock resuscitation and significantly influences patient prognosis. However hemodynamic incoherence is observed when microcirculatory dysfunction persists despite the restoration of macrocirculatory function post-resuscitation. Recent advancements in technology have enabled bedside assessment of microcirculation in shock patients, allowing for direct visualization of microcirculatory morphology and quantitative evaluation of its functional status. This article reviews the pathophysiological mechanisms that lead to hemodynamic incoherence. It also introduces the current understanding and classification framework for the different phenotypes of hemodynamic incoherence. Existing evidence indicates that the diverse mechanisms leading to microcirculatory disorders result in varied manifestations among patients experiencing hemodynamic incoherence, highlighting the heterogeneity of this population. Some classification frameworks have been proposed to enhance our understanding of these phenotypes. By integrating pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical symptoms, indicators of macrocirculation, microcirculation, tissue metabolism, and biomarkers, we can summarize certain clinical features of phenotypes in hemodynamic incoherence to form a conceptual framework. Additionally, strategies for creating targeted treatments based on different phenotypes require further validation.

了解血流动力学不一致性:机制、表型和对治疗的影响。
摘要:微循环功能障碍的逆转是评估休克复苏成功与否的关键,对患者的预后有重大影响。然而,当复苏后宏观循环功能恢复,但微循环功能障碍仍然存在时,就会出现血流动力学不一致。最近技术的进步使休克患者的微循环床旁评估成为可能,从而可以直接观察微循环形态并对其功能状态进行定量评估。本文回顾了导致血液动力学不协调的病理生理机制。文章还介绍了目前对血流动力学不协调不同表型的理解和分类框架。现有证据表明,导致微循环障碍的机制多种多样,导致血流动力学不协调患者的表现也各不相同,凸显了这一人群的异质性。为了加深我们对这些表型的了解,已经提出了一些分类框架。通过整合病理生理机制、临床症状、大循环指标、微循环指标、组织代谢指标和生物标志物,我们可以总结出血液动力学不协调表型的某些临床特征,形成一个概念框架。此外,基于不同表型的靶向治疗策略还需要进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SHOCK
SHOCK 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
199
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: SHOCK®: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches includes studies of novel therapeutic approaches, such as immunomodulation, gene therapy, nutrition, and others. The mission of the Journal is to foster and promote multidisciplinary studies, both experimental and clinical in nature, that critically examine the etiology, mechanisms and novel therapeutics of shock-related pathophysiological conditions. Its purpose is to excel as a vehicle for timely publication in the areas of basic and clinical studies of shock, trauma, sepsis, inflammation, ischemia, and related pathobiological states, with particular emphasis on the biologic mechanisms that determine the response to such injury. Making such information available will ultimately facilitate improved care of the traumatized or septic individual.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信