Barriers to and Facilitators of Effective Behavioral Health Crisis Care Services.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Mark Savill, Lindsay M Banks, Regina Gemignani, Jamie Mouzoon, Bethney Bonilla-Herrera, Matthew L Goldman, Joy Melnikow, Cameron S Carter
{"title":"Barriers to and Facilitators of Effective Behavioral Health Crisis Care Services.","authors":"Mark Savill, Lindsay M Banks, Regina Gemignani, Jamie Mouzoon, Bethney Bonilla-Herrera, Matthew L Goldman, Joy Melnikow, Cameron S Carter","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Expanded funding to support care across the crisis continuum is intended to improve behavioral health outcomes. A greater understanding of how to effectively implement and integrate local crisis care systems has been identified as a research and policy priority. The aim of this study was to explore provider perceptions of the barriers and facilitators associated with implementing effective behavioral health crisis services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with personnel from 15 behavioral health crisis care programs across California. Purposive sampling was used to ensure adequate representation of peer specialists, clinicians, mental health workers, and program leaders. Interview transcripts were analyzed via an inductive approach to thematic analysis. On the basis of patterns identified in the data, initial codes were developed, reviewed, and combined into overarching preliminary themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine crisis care personnel participated. Facilitators of effective crisis care included an optimal crisis service structure, a client-centered approach, engagement with clients' support systems, and collaboration with community partners to link clients to services and enable safe delivery of crisis care. Barriers at the client, program, and system levels were identified, with solutions proposed for each.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The participants identified features of crisis care that could improve program implementation and effectiveness or could help mitigate identified barriers. As states and local municipalities work to implement an integrated system of care across the crisis care continuum, input from frontline providers can be used to support the development of new programs, refine existing services, and inform future directions for research.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"appips20240281"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240281","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Expanded funding to support care across the crisis continuum is intended to improve behavioral health outcomes. A greater understanding of how to effectively implement and integrate local crisis care systems has been identified as a research and policy priority. The aim of this study was to explore provider perceptions of the barriers and facilitators associated with implementing effective behavioral health crisis services.

Methods: The authors conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with personnel from 15 behavioral health crisis care programs across California. Purposive sampling was used to ensure adequate representation of peer specialists, clinicians, mental health workers, and program leaders. Interview transcripts were analyzed via an inductive approach to thematic analysis. On the basis of patterns identified in the data, initial codes were developed, reviewed, and combined into overarching preliminary themes and subthemes.

Results: Twenty-nine crisis care personnel participated. Facilitators of effective crisis care included an optimal crisis service structure, a client-centered approach, engagement with clients' support systems, and collaboration with community partners to link clients to services and enable safe delivery of crisis care. Barriers at the client, program, and system levels were identified, with solutions proposed for each.

Conclusions: The participants identified features of crisis care that could improve program implementation and effectiveness or could help mitigate identified barriers. As states and local municipalities work to implement an integrated system of care across the crisis care continuum, input from frontline providers can be used to support the development of new programs, refine existing services, and inform future directions for research.

有效行为健康危机护理服务的障碍和促进因素。
目标:扩大资金投入以支持整个危机护理过程,旨在改善行为健康结果。更深入地了解如何有效实施和整合地方危机护理系统已被确定为研究和政策的优先事项。本研究旨在探讨医疗服务提供者对实施有效行为健康危机服务的相关障碍和促进因素的看法:作者对来自加利福尼亚州 15 个行为健康危机护理项目的人员进行了半结构化定性访谈。为了确保同伴专家、临床医生、心理健康工作者和项目负责人具有足够的代表性,作者采用了有目的的抽样方法。访谈记录通过归纳法进行主题分析。根据在数据中发现的模式,制定了初步的编码,并对其进行了审查,最后将其合并为总体的初步主题和次主题:结果:29 名危机处理人员参与了研究。有效危机护理的促进因素包括最佳危机服务结构、以客户为中心的方法、与客户支持系统的合作,以及与社区合作伙伴合作将客户与服务联系起来并安全提供危机护理。与会者指出了客户、项目和系统层面的障碍,并针对每个障碍提出了解决方案:与会者指出了危机关怀的特点,这些特点可以改善计划的实施和有效性,或有助于减轻已发现的障碍。随着各州和地方市政当局努力在危机护理的整个过程中实施综合护理系统,来自一线服务提供者的意见可以用来支持新项目的开发、完善现有服务并为未来的研究方向提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatric services
Psychiatric services 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
295
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信