Prediction of dialysis adequacy using data-driven machine learning algorithms.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Renal Failure Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1080/0886022X.2024.2420826
Yi-Chen Liu, Ji-Ping Qing, Rong Li, Juan Chang, Li-Xia Xu
{"title":"Prediction of dialysis adequacy using data-driven machine learning algorithms.","authors":"Yi-Chen Liu, Ji-Ping Qing, Rong Li, Juan Chang, Li-Xia Xu","doi":"10.1080/0886022X.2024.2420826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adequate delivery of hemodialysis (HD), measured by the spKt/V derived from urea reduction, is an important determinant of clinical outcomes in chronic hemodialysis patients. However, the need for pre- and postdialysis blood samples prevented the assessment of spKt/V in every session.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study was performed on end-stage renal disease (ESKD) patients aged ≥ 18 years who received standard thrice-weekly chronic HD therapy. Eighty-seven variables, including general, intradialytic, and laboratory variables, were collected from the medical records for analysis. Five steps of preprocessing procedure were deployed to select only the most relevant variables. Six binary classification models were developed to predict whether spKt/V was higher than 1.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1869 HD sessions from 373 ESKD patients were included in this study. The Random Forest model showed the best prediction for dialysis adequacy, with AUROC scores of 0.860 in the validation dataset and 0.873 in the testing dataset. Notably, an accessible model that solely relied on noninvasively collected general and dialysis-related variables maintained high prediction accuracy, with AUROC scores of 0.854 and 0.868 in the validation and testing datasets, respectively. The five most significant predictive variables were vascular access, gender, body mass index, ultrafiltration volume, and dialysis duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study results suggest that the development of ML models for accurately predicting dialysis adequacy based on general and intradialytic variables is feasible. These models have the potential to be utilized for noninvasive clinical assessments of dialysis adequacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20839,"journal":{"name":"Renal Failure","volume":"46 2","pages":"2420826"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renal Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2024.2420826","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adequate delivery of hemodialysis (HD), measured by the spKt/V derived from urea reduction, is an important determinant of clinical outcomes in chronic hemodialysis patients. However, the need for pre- and postdialysis blood samples prevented the assessment of spKt/V in every session.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study was performed on end-stage renal disease (ESKD) patients aged ≥ 18 years who received standard thrice-weekly chronic HD therapy. Eighty-seven variables, including general, intradialytic, and laboratory variables, were collected from the medical records for analysis. Five steps of preprocessing procedure were deployed to select only the most relevant variables. Six binary classification models were developed to predict whether spKt/V was higher than 1.4.

Results: A total of 1869 HD sessions from 373 ESKD patients were included in this study. The Random Forest model showed the best prediction for dialysis adequacy, with AUROC scores of 0.860 in the validation dataset and 0.873 in the testing dataset. Notably, an accessible model that solely relied on noninvasively collected general and dialysis-related variables maintained high prediction accuracy, with AUROC scores of 0.854 and 0.868 in the validation and testing datasets, respectively. The five most significant predictive variables were vascular access, gender, body mass index, ultrafiltration volume, and dialysis duration.

Conclusion: The study results suggest that the development of ML models for accurately predicting dialysis adequacy based on general and intradialytic variables is feasible. These models have the potential to be utilized for noninvasive clinical assessments of dialysis adequacy.

利用数据驱动的机器学习算法预测透析充分性。
背景:根据尿素减少量得出的 spKt/V 值来衡量血液透析(HD)是否充分,是决定慢性血液透析患者临床疗效的重要因素。然而,由于需要采集透析前和透析后的血液样本,因此无法评估每次透析的 spKt/V:这项回顾性单中心研究的对象是年龄≥ 18 岁、接受每周三次标准慢性血液透析治疗的终末期肾病(ESKD)患者。研究人员从病历中收集了 87 个变量进行分析,包括一般变量、肾内变量和实验室变量。通过五个步骤的预处理程序,只挑选出最相关的变量。建立了六个二元分类模型来预测 spKt/V 是否高于 1.4:本研究共纳入了 373 名 ESKD 患者的 1869 次 HD 治疗。随机森林模型对透析充分性的预测效果最好,验证数据集的 AUROC 得分为 0.860,测试数据集的 AUROC 得分为 0.873。值得注意的是,仅依赖于无创采集的一般变量和透析相关变量的无障碍模型保持了较高的预测准确性,在验证数据集和测试数据集中的AUROC得分分别为0.854和0.868。五个最重要的预测变量是血管通路、性别、体重指数、超滤量和透析持续时间:研究结果表明,根据一般变量和透析内变量开发用于准确预测透析充分性的 ML 模型是可行的。这些模型有望用于透析充分性的无创临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renal Failure
Renal Failure 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Renal Failure primarily concentrates on acute renal injury and its consequence, but also addresses advances in the fields of chronic renal failure, hypertension, and renal transplantation. Bringing together both clinical and experimental aspects of renal failure, this publication presents timely, practical information on pathology and pathophysiology of acute renal failure; nephrotoxicity of drugs and other substances; prevention, treatment, and therapy of renal failure; renal failure in association with transplantation, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信