Screening Adherence for Second Primary Malignancies in Breast Cancer Survivors: Behaviors, Facilitators, and Barriers to Enhance Quality Care.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Fernanda Mesa-Chavez, Misael Salazar-Alejo, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
{"title":"Screening Adherence for Second Primary Malignancies in Breast Cancer Survivors: Behaviors, Facilitators, and Barriers to Enhance Quality Care.","authors":"Fernanda Mesa-Chavez, Misael Salazar-Alejo, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza","doi":"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors, alongside increased life expectancy, breast cancer (BC) survivors have an increased risk of developing a second primary malignancy. Therefore, regular screening for other types of cancer is of utmost importance for their comprehensive care. This cross-sectional study evaluated BC survivors' compliance with cervical, lung, and colorectal cancer screening, and identified facilitators and barriers influencing adherence. Fifty-two BC survivors answered the study's survey. A total of three (6%) cases of second primary malignancies were self-reported. Cervical cancer screening was performed within the past 3 years among 37/50 (74%) eligible participants. Only 7/24 (29%) eligible participants underwent colorectal cancer screening within the last 10 years, including six colonoscopies and 1 occult blood test. No participant had an indication for lung cancer screening. The primary reason for noncompliance with both cervical and colorectal cancer screening was lack of physician's recommendation, accounting for 79% and 88% of cases, respectively. Nearly all participants (98%) affirmed that BC survivors should undergo screening for other types of cancer. Most (96%) stated that, if recommended by a physician, they would agree to undergo screening for other neoplasms. Even though most BC survivors acknowledged its importance, screening particularly for colorectal cancer exhibited suboptimal rates. Oncologists could play a crucial role in increasing cancer screening uptake by reminding patients of their corresponding recommendations to detect other types of cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":21750,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.10.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors, alongside increased life expectancy, breast cancer (BC) survivors have an increased risk of developing a second primary malignancy. Therefore, regular screening for other types of cancer is of utmost importance for their comprehensive care. This cross-sectional study evaluated BC survivors' compliance with cervical, lung, and colorectal cancer screening, and identified facilitators and barriers influencing adherence. Fifty-two BC survivors answered the study's survey. A total of three (6%) cases of second primary malignancies were self-reported. Cervical cancer screening was performed within the past 3 years among 37/50 (74%) eligible participants. Only 7/24 (29%) eligible participants underwent colorectal cancer screening within the last 10 years, including six colonoscopies and 1 occult blood test. No participant had an indication for lung cancer screening. The primary reason for noncompliance with both cervical and colorectal cancer screening was lack of physician's recommendation, accounting for 79% and 88% of cases, respectively. Nearly all participants (98%) affirmed that BC survivors should undergo screening for other types of cancer. Most (96%) stated that, if recommended by a physician, they would agree to undergo screening for other neoplasms. Even though most BC survivors acknowledged its importance, screening particularly for colorectal cancer exhibited suboptimal rates. Oncologists could play a crucial role in increasing cancer screening uptake by reminding patients of their corresponding recommendations to detect other types of cancer.

乳腺癌幸存者坚持筛查第二原发性恶性肿瘤的情况:提高护理质量的行为、促进因素和障碍。
由于遗传、激素和环境因素以及预期寿命的延长,乳腺癌(BC)幸存者罹患第二种原发性恶性肿瘤的风险增加。因此,定期筛查其他类型的癌症对她们的全面护理至关重要。这项横断面研究评估了乳腺癌幸存者对宫颈癌、肺癌和结直肠癌筛查的依从性,并确定了影响依从性的促进因素和障碍。52 名 BC 幸存者回答了研究调查。自我报告的第二原发性恶性肿瘤病例共有三例(6%)。37/50(74%)名符合条件的参与者在过去三年内进行了宫颈癌筛查。只有 7/24 名(29%)符合条件的参与者在过去 10 年内接受了结肠直肠癌筛查,包括 6 次结肠镜检查和 1 次隐血试验。没有参与者有肺癌筛查指征。未接受宫颈癌和结肠直肠癌筛查的主要原因是缺乏医生建议,分别占 79% 和 88%。几乎所有的参与者(98%)都认为 BC 幸存者应该接受其他类型癌症的筛查。大多数人(96%)表示,如果医生推荐,他们会同意接受其他肿瘤筛查。尽管大多数 BC 幸存者都承认筛查的重要性,但筛查率尤其是结肠直肠癌筛查率并不理想。肿瘤学家可以通过提醒患者接受相应的建议来检测其他类型的癌症,从而在提高癌症筛查率方面发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in oncology
Seminars in oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
104 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology brings you current, authoritative, and practical reviews of developments in the etiology, diagnosis and management of cancer. Each issue examines topics of clinical importance, with an emphasis on providing both the basic knowledge needed to better understand a topic as well as evidence-based opinions from leaders in the field. Seminars in Oncology also seeks to be a venue for sharing a diversity of opinions including those that might be considered "outside the box". We welcome a healthy and respectful exchange of opinions and urge you to approach us with your insights as well as suggestions of topics that you deem worthy of coverage. By helping the reader understand the basic biology and the therapy of cancer as they learn the nuances from experts, all in a journal that encourages the exchange of ideas we aim to help move the treatment of cancer forward.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信