Comparison of 45-min nap versus no-nap during simulated night shift work on endothelial function: a randomized crossover feasibility trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
P Daniel Patterson, Cassie J Hilditch, Sarah E Martin, David G L Roach, Matthew D Weaver, Tiffany S Okerman, David Hostler, Leonard S Weiss, Steven E Reis
{"title":"Comparison of 45-min nap versus no-nap during simulated night shift work on endothelial function: a randomized crossover feasibility trial.","authors":"P Daniel Patterson, Cassie J Hilditch, Sarah E Martin, David G L Roach, Matthew D Weaver, Tiffany S Okerman, David Hostler, Leonard S Weiss, Steven E Reis","doi":"10.1186/s40814-024-01569-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Night shift workers face increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to non-shift workers. Evidence supports on-shift napping and regular non-invasive monitoring of endothelial function for risk mitigation, yet neither strategy is widely used.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the feasibility of non-invasive assessment of peripheral arterial tone (PAT) to assess the effect of napping during simulated night shift work on endothelial function. We used a single-site, randomized crossover trial of simulated night shift work with a 45-min nap condition versus a control, no-nap condition (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05436951).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome was the number of participants with ≥ 70% of endothelial function assessments. Secondary outcomes included mean reactive hyperemia index (RHI), BP, and cognitive performance with the brief psychomotor vigilance task (PVT-B). Of the 10 consented, 9 completed both conditions. All participants exceeded feasibility benchmarks. Mean RHI did not differ by nap condition, and the delta from pre- to post measure did not differ (difference in delta =  - 0.26, 95% CI - 1.09, 0.58). Hourly PVT-B assessments from 19:00 to 07:00 h did not differ by nap condition. Compared to pre-nap measures, cognitive performance on the PVT-B was poorest at + 0 min post-nap.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings can inform larger studies evaluating the effects of night shift work and napping on endothelial function.</p><p><strong>Trial registrations: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05436951, registered on June 23, 2022).</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01569-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Night shift workers face increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to non-shift workers. Evidence supports on-shift napping and regular non-invasive monitoring of endothelial function for risk mitigation, yet neither strategy is widely used.

Methods: We evaluated the feasibility of non-invasive assessment of peripheral arterial tone (PAT) to assess the effect of napping during simulated night shift work on endothelial function. We used a single-site, randomized crossover trial of simulated night shift work with a 45-min nap condition versus a control, no-nap condition (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05436951).

Results: The primary outcome was the number of participants with ≥ 70% of endothelial function assessments. Secondary outcomes included mean reactive hyperemia index (RHI), BP, and cognitive performance with the brief psychomotor vigilance task (PVT-B). Of the 10 consented, 9 completed both conditions. All participants exceeded feasibility benchmarks. Mean RHI did not differ by nap condition, and the delta from pre- to post measure did not differ (difference in delta =  - 0.26, 95% CI - 1.09, 0.58). Hourly PVT-B assessments from 19:00 to 07:00 h did not differ by nap condition. Compared to pre-nap measures, cognitive performance on the PVT-B was poorest at + 0 min post-nap.

Conclusion: Our findings can inform larger studies evaluating the effects of night shift work and napping on endothelial function.

Trial registrations: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05436951, registered on June 23, 2022).

模拟夜班工作期间 45 分钟小睡与不小睡对内皮功能的影响比较:随机交叉可行性试验。
背景:与非夜班工人相比,夜班工人患心血管疾病(CVD)的风险更高。有证据支持轮班小睡和定期无创监测内皮功能以降低风险,但这两种策略都没有得到广泛应用:我们评估了外周动脉张力(PAT)无创评估的可行性,以评估模拟夜班工作期间小睡对内皮功能的影响。我们采用了单点、随机交叉试验的方法,在模拟夜班工作中进行 45 分钟小睡与无小睡对照试验(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05436951):主要结果是内皮功能评估≥70%的参与者人数。次要结果包括平均反应性充血指数(RHI)、血压和简短精神运动警觉任务(PVT-B)的认知表现。在获得同意的 10 人中,9 人完成了两种条件。所有参与者都超过了可行性基准。不同午睡条件下的平均 RHI 没有差异,测量前与测量后的 delta 值也没有差异(delta 值差异 = - 0.26,95% CI - 1.09,0.58)。从 19:00 到 07:00 的每小时 PVT-B 评估结果也没有因午睡条件的不同而有所差异。与午睡前的测量结果相比,午睡后+0分钟时的PVT-B认知表现最差:我们的研究结果可为评估夜班工作和午睡对内皮功能影响的大型研究提供参考:ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT05436951,2022年6月23日注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信