Addressing unmet social needs of children with obesity: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Gita Wahi, Stacey Marjerrison, Simrat Gill, Kimberley Krasevich, Katherine M Morrison, Lehana Thabane
{"title":"Addressing unmet social needs of children with obesity: a pilot randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Gita Wahi, Stacey Marjerrison, Simrat Gill, Kimberley Krasevich, Katherine M Morrison, Lehana Thabane","doi":"10.1186/s40814-024-01570-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childhood obesity is an ongoing public health crisis, and recent clinical practice guidelines identify addressing the role of social inequities in the disparity of health among children with obesity as an area to address. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a community navigation intervention in a pediatric weight management clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) recruiting families from a tertiary hospital pediatric weight management program to evaluate the feasibility of a community navigation intervention. The primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rates (goal to recruit 80% of the sample in 6 months), uptake of the intervention (goal > 80% of participants in the intervention group to have a visit with the navigator), and acceptability (goal > 90% of families in the intervention group complete all follow-up).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty participants completed the social needs screening, and 42 (52.5%) participants screened positive for an unmet social need. In the first 6 months of recruitment, 18 participants were recruited out of a goal of 40 participants (the recruitment rate was 45% vs. the goal of 80% in 6 months), and complete recruitment was achieved in 12 months. Of the 21 participants randomized to the intervention arm, 20 completed the intervention (uptake of intervention was 95% vs. goal 80%). Ten participants in the intervention arm completed all four planned follow-up study visits (the acceptability of follow-up was 48% vs. the goal of 90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We completed a pilot RCT of implementing a community navigator program in a pediatric weight management program. We found feasibility in the intervention's uptake but limited feasibility in recruiting participants and the acceptability of the follow-up.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04711707, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04711707.</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01570-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Childhood obesity is an ongoing public health crisis, and recent clinical practice guidelines identify addressing the role of social inequities in the disparity of health among children with obesity as an area to address. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a community navigation intervention in a pediatric weight management clinic.

Methods: A single-center pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) recruiting families from a tertiary hospital pediatric weight management program to evaluate the feasibility of a community navigation intervention. The primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rates (goal to recruit 80% of the sample in 6 months), uptake of the intervention (goal > 80% of participants in the intervention group to have a visit with the navigator), and acceptability (goal > 90% of families in the intervention group complete all follow-up).

Results: Eighty participants completed the social needs screening, and 42 (52.5%) participants screened positive for an unmet social need. In the first 6 months of recruitment, 18 participants were recruited out of a goal of 40 participants (the recruitment rate was 45% vs. the goal of 80% in 6 months), and complete recruitment was achieved in 12 months. Of the 21 participants randomized to the intervention arm, 20 completed the intervention (uptake of intervention was 95% vs. goal 80%). Ten participants in the intervention arm completed all four planned follow-up study visits (the acceptability of follow-up was 48% vs. the goal of 90%).

Conclusion: We completed a pilot RCT of implementing a community navigator program in a pediatric weight management program. We found feasibility in the intervention's uptake but limited feasibility in recruiting participants and the acceptability of the follow-up.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04711707, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04711707.

满足肥胖儿童未得到满足的社会需求:随机对照试验。
背景:儿童肥胖症是一个持续的公共卫生危机,最近的临床实践指南将解决社会不平等在肥胖儿童健康差异中的作用确定为一个需要解决的领域。本研究旨在评估在儿科体重管理诊所开展社区导航干预的可行性:一项单中心试点随机对照试验(RCT)从一家三甲医院的儿科体重管理项目中招募家庭,以评估社区导航干预的可行性。主要的可行性结果是招募率(目标是在 6 个月内招募到 80% 的样本)、干预的接受度(目标是干预组中有 80% 以上的参与者接受了导航员的访问)和可接受性(目标是干预组中有 90% 以上的家庭完成了所有随访):80名参与者完成了社会需求筛查,42名(52.5%)参与者筛查出未满足的社会需求。在招募的前 6 个月,在 40 名参与者的目标中招募到了 18 名参与者(招募率为 45%,而目标是在 6 个月内招募到 80%的参与者),并在 12 个月内完成了全部招募工作。在被随机分配到干预组的 21 名参与者中,有 20 人完成了干预(干预接受率为 95%,目标为 80%)。干预组中有 10 名参与者完成了所有四次计划的随访研究(随访的可接受性为 48%,目标为 90%):我们完成了一项在儿科体重管理计划中实施社区导航员计划的试点 RCT。结论:我们完成了一项在儿科体重管理计划中实施社区导航员计划的试验性 RCT。我们发现该干预措施在接受度方面具有可行性,但在招募参与者和随访的可接受性方面可行性有限:Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT04711707,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04711707。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信