Strategies and Management for Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Series.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jaqueline K Eserian, Vinícius P Blanco, Lucildes P Mercuri, Jivaldo R Matos, Eugênia A Kalleian, José C F Galduróz
{"title":"Strategies and Management for Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Series.","authors":"Jaqueline K Eserian, Vinícius P Blanco, Lucildes P Mercuri, Jivaldo R Matos, Eugênia A Kalleian, José C F Galduróz","doi":"10.1055/a-2443-1189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, an increasing number of case reports on psychiatric drug withdrawal have emerged, offering detailed clinical insights and valuable real-world evidence on the withdrawal process. The objective of this review was to evaluate the strategies and management for withdrawing psychiatric drugs, as detailed in case reports and series. A systematic review of case reports and series published between 2013 and 2023 was conducted to capture the latest trends in psychiatric drug withdrawal. Cases were identified following the PRISMA guidelines by searching electronic databases Medline and Scopus. Finally, 47 case reports and series were included. The primary reason for drug withdrawal was attributed to the emergence of adverse events, followed by medication dependence or abuse, and clinical decision-making or symptom resolution. Gradual reduction of doses was implemented through various management approaches as the primary strategy for drug withdrawal, and drug substitution emerged as the second most employed strategy. Also, patients were mostly undergoing polypharmacy. Favorable treatment outcomes were reported in the majority of cases, suggesting that psychiatric drug withdrawal is feasible - though quite challenging in some situations. However, the remarkably low number of unsuccessful cases may create a misleading impression of the significant difficulty associated with withdrawing psychiatric drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19783,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2443-1189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, an increasing number of case reports on psychiatric drug withdrawal have emerged, offering detailed clinical insights and valuable real-world evidence on the withdrawal process. The objective of this review was to evaluate the strategies and management for withdrawing psychiatric drugs, as detailed in case reports and series. A systematic review of case reports and series published between 2013 and 2023 was conducted to capture the latest trends in psychiatric drug withdrawal. Cases were identified following the PRISMA guidelines by searching electronic databases Medline and Scopus. Finally, 47 case reports and series were included. The primary reason for drug withdrawal was attributed to the emergence of adverse events, followed by medication dependence or abuse, and clinical decision-making or symptom resolution. Gradual reduction of doses was implemented through various management approaches as the primary strategy for drug withdrawal, and drug substitution emerged as the second most employed strategy. Also, patients were mostly undergoing polypharmacy. Favorable treatment outcomes were reported in the majority of cases, suggesting that psychiatric drug withdrawal is feasible - though quite challenging in some situations. However, the remarkably low number of unsuccessful cases may create a misleading impression of the significant difficulty associated with withdrawing psychiatric drugs.

精神科药物戒断的策略和管理:病例报告和系列报告的系统回顾。
近年来,关于精神科药物戒断的病例报告越来越多,为戒断过程提供了详细的临床见解和宝贵的现实证据。本综述旨在评估病例报告和系列报道中详述的精神科药物戒断策略和管理。我们对 2013 年至 2023 年间发表的病例报告和系列文章进行了系统性回顾,以了解精神科药物戒断的最新趋势。按照 PRISMA 指南,通过搜索电子数据库 Medline 和 Scopus 来确定病例。最后,共纳入了 47 份病例报告和系列报告。停药的主要原因是出现不良反应,其次是药物依赖或滥用,以及临床决策或症状缓解。停药的主要策略是通过各种管理方法逐步减少剂量,而药物替代则是第二大策略。此外,患者大多接受多种药物治疗。大多数病例都取得了良好的治疗效果,这表明精神科药物戒断是可行的,尽管在某些情况下颇具挑战性。不过,不成功的病例数量极少,这可能会让人误以为精神科药物的戒断非常困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacopsychiatry
Pharmacopsychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering advances in the fi eld of psychotropic drugs, Pharmaco psychiatry provides psychiatrists, neuroscientists and clinicians with key clinical insights and describes new avenues of research and treatment. The pharmacological and neurobiological bases of psychiatric disorders are discussed by presenting clinical and experimental research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信