Protocol development and feasibility of the PEACH in Asia study: A pilot study on PEri-anesthetic morbidity in CHildren in Asia.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Soichiro Obara, Choon Looi Bong, Zehra Serpil Ustalar Ozgen, Shemila Abbasi, Ekta Rai, Evangeline K Villa, Andi Ade W Ramlan, Raihanita Zahra, Christopher Kapuangan, Komang Ayu Ferdiana, Ina Ismiarti Shariffuddin, Vivian Yuen, Elsa Varghese, Josephine S K Tan, Norifumi Kuratani
{"title":"Protocol development and feasibility of the PEACH in Asia study: A pilot study on PEri-anesthetic morbidity in CHildren in Asia.","authors":"Soichiro Obara, Choon Looi Bong, Zehra Serpil Ustalar Ozgen, Shemila Abbasi, Ekta Rai, Evangeline K Villa, Andi Ade W Ramlan, Raihanita Zahra, Christopher Kapuangan, Komang Ayu Ferdiana, Ina Ismiarti Shariffuddin, Vivian Yuen, Elsa Varghese, Josephine S K Tan, Norifumi Kuratani","doi":"10.1111/pan.15034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Comprehensive data on pediatric anesthesia outcomes, particularly severe critical events (SCEs), are scarce in Asia. This highlights the need for standardized research to assess anesthesia safety and quality in the diverse settings.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The PEACH in Asia pilot study aimed to test the feasibility of a standardized protocol for investigating SCEs in anesthesia practices across Asia, evaluate the data acquisition processes, and determine the sample size for a main study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter pilot study involved ten institutions across nine Asian countries, including children from birth to 15 years undergoing diagnostic or surgical procedures. Data on SCEs were collected using standardized definitions. The study assessed the feasibility and estimated the sample size needed for the main study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pilot study enrolled 330 patients, with a SCE incidence of 12.4% (95% CI: 9.2-16.4%). Respiratory events were observed in 7.0% of cases, cardiovascular instability in 4.9%, and drug errors in 0.6%. Based on the SCE incidence observed in the pilot study, the estimated sample size required for the main study is at least 10 958 patients. The pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of the study protocol but identified several challenges, particularly in resource-limited settings. These challenges included a significant burden associated with data collection, technical issues with electronic case report forms (e-CRFs), variability in patient enrollment across institutions (ranging from 4 to 86 patients per site), and incomplete data acquisition (24.8% of height data and 9.7% of disposition data were missing).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PEACH in Asia pilot study successfully validated a protocol for investigating SCEs in pediatric anesthesia across Asia. Addressing the challenges identified in the pilot study will be crucial for generating robust data to improve pediatric anesthesia safety in the region. Key issues to address include improving data collection methods, resolving e-CRF technical difficulties, and ensuring consistent institutional support.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.15034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive data on pediatric anesthesia outcomes, particularly severe critical events (SCEs), are scarce in Asia. This highlights the need for standardized research to assess anesthesia safety and quality in the diverse settings.

Aims: The PEACH in Asia pilot study aimed to test the feasibility of a standardized protocol for investigating SCEs in anesthesia practices across Asia, evaluate the data acquisition processes, and determine the sample size for a main study.

Methods: This multicenter pilot study involved ten institutions across nine Asian countries, including children from birth to 15 years undergoing diagnostic or surgical procedures. Data on SCEs were collected using standardized definitions. The study assessed the feasibility and estimated the sample size needed for the main study.

Results: The pilot study enrolled 330 patients, with a SCE incidence of 12.4% (95% CI: 9.2-16.4%). Respiratory events were observed in 7.0% of cases, cardiovascular instability in 4.9%, and drug errors in 0.6%. Based on the SCE incidence observed in the pilot study, the estimated sample size required for the main study is at least 10 958 patients. The pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of the study protocol but identified several challenges, particularly in resource-limited settings. These challenges included a significant burden associated with data collection, technical issues with electronic case report forms (e-CRFs), variability in patient enrollment across institutions (ranging from 4 to 86 patients per site), and incomplete data acquisition (24.8% of height data and 9.7% of disposition data were missing).

Conclusions: The PEACH in Asia pilot study successfully validated a protocol for investigating SCEs in pediatric anesthesia across Asia. Addressing the challenges identified in the pilot study will be crucial for generating robust data to improve pediatric anesthesia safety in the region. Key issues to address include improving data collection methods, resolving e-CRF technical difficulties, and ensuring consistent institutional support.

亚洲 PEACH 研究的方案制定和可行性:亚洲儿童PEACH麻醉发病率试点研究。
背景:在亚洲,有关儿科麻醉结果,尤其是严重危急事件(SCE)的综合数据非常缺乏。目的:亚洲 PEACH 试验研究旨在测试在亚洲各地麻醉实践中调查 SCEs 的标准化方案的可行性,评估数据采集流程,并确定主要研究的样本量:这项多中心试点研究涉及九个亚洲国家的十家机构,包括接受诊断或外科手术的出生至 15 岁的儿童。采用标准化定义收集 SCE 数据。该研究评估了主要研究的可行性并估算了所需样本量:试点研究共招募了 330 名患者,SCE 发生率为 12.4%(95% CI:9.2-16.4%)。7.0%的病例观察到呼吸系统事件,4.9%的病例观察到心血管不稳定,0.6%的病例观察到用药错误。根据试点研究中观察到的 SCE 发生率,主要研究估计至少需要 10 958 名患者的样本量。试点研究证明了研究方案的可行性,但也发现了一些挑战,尤其是在资源有限的环境中。这些挑战包括数据收集带来的巨大负担、电子病例报告表(e-CRFs)的技术问题、各机构患者入组情况的差异(每个机构入组 4 到 86 名患者不等)以及数据采集不完整(24.8% 的身高数据和 9.7% 的处置数据缺失):亚洲 PEACH 试验研究成功验证了亚洲儿科麻醉中 SCE 的调查方案。应对试点研究中发现的挑战对于生成可靠数据以改善该地区儿科麻醉安全至关重要。需要解决的关键问题包括:改进数据收集方法、解决 e-CRF 技术难题以及确保机构的持续支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信