Using a Pre-Radiation Window to Identify Potentially Active Cytotoxic Agents in Adults with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.

IF 16.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Danielle A Bazer, Antonio C Wolff, Stuart A Grossman
{"title":"Using a Pre-Radiation Window to Identify Potentially Active Cytotoxic Agents in Adults with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.","authors":"Danielle A Bazer, Antonio C Wolff, Stuart A Grossman","doi":"10.1093/neuonc/noae240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapies shown to improve outcomes in patients with recurrent cancers are commonly used in the neoadjuvant setting to optimize surgery, reduce radiation fields, and treat micro-metastatic disease. While pre-radiation chemotherapy (PRC) use has flourished in systemic cancers, it has not in glioblastomas. This review documents these trajectories and highlights the potential of PRC to rapidly and safely screen cytotoxic drugs for efficacy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective trials of adults with newly diagnosed systemic and brain cancers treated with PRC published between 1980 and 2023 were identified in PubMed. NCCN guidelines were used to document the standard use of PRC in patients with systemic and brain cancers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 5,000 prospective PRC trials in solid tumors were identified. These accrued >1 million patients and resulted in neoadjuvant therapies being standard-of-care in ~28 systemic cancers. Only 50 similar trials (2,206 patients) were identified in high grade gliomas. In 13 trials containing PRC temozolomide (n=846), radiographic responses ranged from 6-53% with a median survival of ~13 months. Glioblastoma PRC trials were not associated with unexpected toxicities or major negative impacts on survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRC in patients with glioblastoma appears safe and feasible. The pre-radiation window is ideally suited to rapidly screen cytotoxic agents for efficacy. It permits radiographic response as a primary outcome, small sample sizes, and initiation of standard therapies a few months after diagnosis. PRC may be most appropriate in patients with glioblastoma who are unlikely to benefit from temozolomide.</p>","PeriodicalId":19377,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae240","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Therapies shown to improve outcomes in patients with recurrent cancers are commonly used in the neoadjuvant setting to optimize surgery, reduce radiation fields, and treat micro-metastatic disease. While pre-radiation chemotherapy (PRC) use has flourished in systemic cancers, it has not in glioblastomas. This review documents these trajectories and highlights the potential of PRC to rapidly and safely screen cytotoxic drugs for efficacy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Methods: Prospective trials of adults with newly diagnosed systemic and brain cancers treated with PRC published between 1980 and 2023 were identified in PubMed. NCCN guidelines were used to document the standard use of PRC in patients with systemic and brain cancers.

Results: Over 5,000 prospective PRC trials in solid tumors were identified. These accrued >1 million patients and resulted in neoadjuvant therapies being standard-of-care in ~28 systemic cancers. Only 50 similar trials (2,206 patients) were identified in high grade gliomas. In 13 trials containing PRC temozolomide (n=846), radiographic responses ranged from 6-53% with a median survival of ~13 months. Glioblastoma PRC trials were not associated with unexpected toxicities or major negative impacts on survival.

Conclusions: PRC in patients with glioblastoma appears safe and feasible. The pre-radiation window is ideally suited to rapidly screen cytotoxic agents for efficacy. It permits radiographic response as a primary outcome, small sample sizes, and initiation of standard therapies a few months after diagnosis. PRC may be most appropriate in patients with glioblastoma who are unlikely to benefit from temozolomide.

利用放疗前窗口识别新诊断胶质母细胞瘤成人患者中潜在的活性细胞毒性药物
背景:新辅助治疗可改善复发性癌症患者的预后,通常用于优化手术、缩小放射范围和治疗微转移疾病。尽管放疗前化疗(PRC)在全身性癌症中得到了蓬勃发展,但在胶质母细胞瘤中却并非如此。本综述记录了这些发展轨迹,并强调了放射前化疗在快速、安全地筛选细胞毒性药物对新诊断胶质母细胞瘤患者疗效的潜力:方法:在PubMed上查找了1980年至2023年间发表的采用PRC治疗新诊断的系统性癌症和脑癌成人的前瞻性试验。NCCN指南用于记录PRC在全身性癌症和脑癌患者中的标准应用:结果:确定了 5,000 多项针对实体瘤的前瞻性 PRC 试验。这些试验共招募了超过 100 万名患者,并使新辅助疗法成为约 28 种全身性癌症的标准疗法。在高级别胶质瘤中只发现了 50 项类似试验(2206 名患者)。在13项含有PRC替莫唑胺(n=846)的试验中,放射学反应从6%到53%不等,中位生存期约为13个月。胶质母细胞瘤PRC试验未出现意外毒性反应,也未对生存产生重大负面影响:对胶质母细胞瘤患者进行PRC治疗似乎安全可行。放射治疗前的窗口期非常适合快速筛选细胞毒性药物的疗效。它允许将放射学反应作为主要结果,样本量较小,并可在确诊后几个月开始标准疗法。对于不太可能从替莫唑胺治疗中获益的胶质母细胞瘤患者来说,放疗前放射治疗可能最合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology
Neuro-oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
6.30%
发文量
1434
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology, the official journal of the Society for Neuro-Oncology, has been published monthly since January 2010. Affiliated with the Japan Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology, it is a global leader in the field. The journal is committed to swiftly disseminating high-quality information across all areas of neuro-oncology. It features peer-reviewed articles, reviews, symposia on various topics, abstracts from annual meetings, and updates from neuro-oncology societies worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信