Regional analgesia techniques following nephrectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Jinwen Huang, Xia Liu, Lingkai Wang, Lei Zhu, Donggang He, Ruijuan Liu, Wenjun Yan
{"title":"Regional analgesia techniques following nephrectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Jinwen Huang, Xia Liu, Lingkai Wang, Lei Zhu, Donggang He, Ruijuan Liu, Wenjun Yan","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18373-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of various regional analgesic techniques used in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy or nephrectomy.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating different regional analgesia techniques in patients underwent partial nephrectomy or nephrectomy were retrieved from databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, from inception to January 2024. The NMA was made by using Stata 15.1 softwares. The certainty of evidence was assessed by using CINeMA.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>We included 27 trials with 1852 patients and 14 techniques. Postoperative resting pain scores within 24 hours were decreased by erector spinae plane block (ESPB), thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), intrathecal morphine (IM), retrolaminar block (RLB). Postoperative movement pain scores within 24 hours were decreased by ESPB, TPVB, lateral quadratus lumborum block (QLB-L), transversus abdominis plane block. Postoperative opiates consumption within 24 hours were decreased most by QLB-L, followed by transmuscular QLB (QLB-TM), TPVB, and IM. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were decreased by RLB, anterior QLB approach at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament (QLB-LSAL). Length of hospital stay were decreased by TPVB, ESPB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This available evidence suggests that ESPB and TPVB are more likely to reduce pain scores within 24 hours and shorten the length of hospital stay. QLB-L and QLB-TM are more likely to reduce the cumulative opiates consumption within 24 hours. RLB and QLB-LSAL are more likely to decrease the incidence of PONV. The wound infiltration (WI), intraperitoneal instillation (IPI), and WI+IPI are less likely to be effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18373-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of various regional analgesic techniques used in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy or nephrectomy.

Evidence acquisition: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating different regional analgesia techniques in patients underwent partial nephrectomy or nephrectomy were retrieved from databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, from inception to January 2024. The NMA was made by using Stata 15.1 softwares. The certainty of evidence was assessed by using CINeMA.

Evidence synthesis: We included 27 trials with 1852 patients and 14 techniques. Postoperative resting pain scores within 24 hours were decreased by erector spinae plane block (ESPB), thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), intrathecal morphine (IM), retrolaminar block (RLB). Postoperative movement pain scores within 24 hours were decreased by ESPB, TPVB, lateral quadratus lumborum block (QLB-L), transversus abdominis plane block. Postoperative opiates consumption within 24 hours were decreased most by QLB-L, followed by transmuscular QLB (QLB-TM), TPVB, and IM. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were decreased by RLB, anterior QLB approach at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament (QLB-LSAL). Length of hospital stay were decreased by TPVB, ESPB.

Conclusions: This available evidence suggests that ESPB and TPVB are more likely to reduce pain scores within 24 hours and shorten the length of hospital stay. QLB-L and QLB-TM are more likely to reduce the cumulative opiates consumption within 24 hours. RLB and QLB-LSAL are more likely to decrease the incidence of PONV. The wound infiltration (WI), intraperitoneal instillation (IPI), and WI+IPI are less likely to be effective.

肾切除术后的区域镇痛技术:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
简介:本网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在评估肾部分切除术或肾切除术患者使用的各种区域镇痛技术的相对有效性和安全性:从 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆等数据库中检索了从开始到 2024 年 1 月对接受肾部分切除术或肾切除术的患者使用不同区域镇痛技术进行评估的随机对照试验 (RCT)。使用 Stata 15.1 软件进行了 NMA 分析。证据的确定性通过 CINeMA 进行评估:我们纳入了 27 项试验,涉及 1852 名患者和 14 种技术。竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)、胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)、鞘内吗啡(IM)、椎板后阻滞(RLB)可降低术后 24 小时内的静息痛评分。ESPB、TPVB、侧腰四肌阻滞(QLB-L)、腹横肌平面阻滞可降低术后24小时内的运动疼痛评分。术后 24 小时内阿片类药物的消耗量因 QLB-L 而减少最多,其次是经肌 QLB(QLB-TM)、TPVB 和 IM。术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)通过RLB、侧腹股沟上韧带前QLB方法(QLB-LSAL)减少。TPVB和ESPB缩短了住院时间:现有证据表明,ESPB 和 TPVB 更有可能在 24 小时内降低疼痛评分并缩短住院时间。QLB-L和QLB-TM更有可能在24小时内减少阿片类药物的累积用量。RLB 和 QLB-LSAL 更有可能降低 PONV 的发生率。伤口浸润(WI)、腹腔内灌注(IPI)和 WI+IPI 的效果较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信