Comparison of dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and magnesium sulfate for the prevention of emergence agitation following sevoflurane-based anesthesia in pediatric cardiac catheterization.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Passaint F Hassan, Amany H Saleh
{"title":"Comparison of dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and magnesium sulfate for the prevention of emergence agitation following sevoflurane-based anesthesia in pediatric cardiac catheterization.","authors":"Passaint F Hassan, Amany H Saleh","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18306-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergence agitation (EA) is non-purposeful agitation that occurs during the early stages of general anesthesia recovery. This randomized, double-blinded trial aimed to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and magnesium sulfate on the severity of EA following sevoflurane-based anesthesia in pediatric cardiac catheterization. We examined the fixed doses and assessed the severity of agitation using the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAED) score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred children undergoing heart catheterization without local anesthetic in the skin were randomly divided into four groups. The Dexmedetomidine (D) Group (N.=25) received dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg IV over 10 min, then 0.5 μg/kg/h. The Magnesium Sulfate (M) Group (N.=25) received 15 mg/k MgSo4 IV over 10 min and then 10 mg/kg/h. The Ketamine (K) Group (N.=25) received 1 mg/kg ketamine over 10 min, then 1 mg/kg/h. The Control (C) Group (N.=25) received 0.9% saline at the same rate as other groups. All medications were diluted in 50 mL 0.9% saline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dexmedetomidine group exhibited a 0% incidence of EA, compared to 4% in the ketamine group, 12% in the MgSO4 group, and 40% in the control groups (P<0.001). Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced the PAED Scale and pain scores compared to the other groups. The effects of ketamine and MgSO4 on PAED and pain scores were comparable, with both treatments demonstrating significantly lower scores than the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dexmedetomidine exhibited higher efficacy than ketamine and magnesium sulfate in reducing the severity of postoperative EA. However, ketamine and magnesium sulfate demonstrated comparable efficacy, exceeding that of the control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18306-X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergence agitation (EA) is non-purposeful agitation that occurs during the early stages of general anesthesia recovery. This randomized, double-blinded trial aimed to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and magnesium sulfate on the severity of EA following sevoflurane-based anesthesia in pediatric cardiac catheterization. We examined the fixed doses and assessed the severity of agitation using the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAED) score.

Methods: One hundred children undergoing heart catheterization without local anesthetic in the skin were randomly divided into four groups. The Dexmedetomidine (D) Group (N.=25) received dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg IV over 10 min, then 0.5 μg/kg/h. The Magnesium Sulfate (M) Group (N.=25) received 15 mg/k MgSo4 IV over 10 min and then 10 mg/kg/h. The Ketamine (K) Group (N.=25) received 1 mg/kg ketamine over 10 min, then 1 mg/kg/h. The Control (C) Group (N.=25) received 0.9% saline at the same rate as other groups. All medications were diluted in 50 mL 0.9% saline.

Results: The dexmedetomidine group exhibited a 0% incidence of EA, compared to 4% in the ketamine group, 12% in the MgSO4 group, and 40% in the control groups (P<0.001). Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced the PAED Scale and pain scores compared to the other groups. The effects of ketamine and MgSO4 on PAED and pain scores were comparable, with both treatments demonstrating significantly lower scores than the control group.

Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine exhibited higher efficacy than ketamine and magnesium sulfate in reducing the severity of postoperative EA. However, ketamine and magnesium sulfate demonstrated comparable efficacy, exceeding that of the control group.

比较右美托咪定、氯胺酮和硫酸镁在小儿心脏导管术中基于七氟醚的麻醉后防止出现躁动的效果。
背景:出院躁动(EA)是指全身麻醉恢复初期出现的非目的性躁动。这项随机双盲试验旨在比较右美托咪定、氯胺酮和硫酸镁对小儿心导管术中基于七氟醚的麻醉后 EA 严重程度的影响。我们研究了固定剂量,并使用小儿麻醉后谵妄量表(PAED)评分评估了躁动的严重程度:方法:100 名接受心脏导管术的儿童被随机分为四组,每组不使用皮肤局麻药。右美托咪定(D)组(N=25)在 10 分钟内静脉注射右美托咪定 1 μg/kg,然后 0.5 μg/kg/h。硫酸镁(M)组(25 人)在 10 分钟内静脉注射 15 毫克/千克 MgSo4,然后每小时 10 毫克/千克。氯胺酮(K)组(25 人)在 10 分钟内静脉注射 1 毫克/千克氯胺酮,然后每小时 1 毫克/千克。对照(C)组(25 人)接受 0.9% 生理盐水,剂量与其他组相同。所有药物均用 50 mL 0.9% 生理盐水稀释:结果:右美托咪定组的 EA 发生率为 0%,而氯胺酮组为 4%,硫酸镁组为 12%,对照组为 40%:右美托咪定在降低术后EA严重程度方面的疗效高于氯胺酮和硫酸镁。不过,氯胺酮和硫酸镁的疗效相当,超过了对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信