Qualitative analysis of clinical pharmacy interventions in an inpatient leukemia service.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Rand Al-Hadaddin, Nour Mustafa, Ahmad Alyamani, Nour Faqeer
{"title":"Qualitative analysis of clinical pharmacy interventions in an inpatient leukemia service.","authors":"Rand Al-Hadaddin, Nour Mustafa, Ahmad Alyamani, Nour Faqeer","doi":"10.1177/10781552241296407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Leukemia, a complex hematological malignancy, requires a multidisciplinary treatment approach, with clinical pharmacists playing a crucial role. However, their involvement in clinical practice is not well-documented in the literature. This study aimed to examine the characteristics of clinical pharmacy interventions (CPIs) reported by clinical pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective study involved extraction of CPIs entered into a pharmacy documentation database \"Quantifi<sup>®</sup>\" between January 2019 and June 2023. These CPIs included direct clinical pharmacist interventions (DCPIs), detected medication errors (MEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6286 CPIs were extracted, of which DCPIs, MEs and ADRs accounted for 5701 (90.7%), 357 (5.7%) and 228 (3.6%) reports, respectively. The most prevalent DCPIs were drug therapy discontinuation (n = 1080, 18.9%). Antimicrobials were the most common medications associated with DCPIs (n = 1991, 34.9%). Physicians accepted 99.4% of DCPIs and 64.1% (n = 3656) of direct interventions were considered significant. Among detected MEs, antimicrobials were the most reported medications (n = 158, 44.3%), with pharmacy internal errors being the most prevalent cause of the events (n = 172, 48.2%). Among the reported ADRs, hematological reactions were the most common (n = 81, 35.5%), and antineoplastic agents were the most frequently associated medications with ADRs (n = 164, 71.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the crucial role of clinical pharmacists in managing leukemia patients, emphasizing their key interventions and ability to identify MEs and ADRs. Further research is needed to explore the clinical outcomes and financial impact of their involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241296407","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Leukemia, a complex hematological malignancy, requires a multidisciplinary treatment approach, with clinical pharmacists playing a crucial role. However, their involvement in clinical practice is not well-documented in the literature. This study aimed to examine the characteristics of clinical pharmacy interventions (CPIs) reported by clinical pharmacists.

Method: This retrospective study involved extraction of CPIs entered into a pharmacy documentation database "Quantifi®" between January 2019 and June 2023. These CPIs included direct clinical pharmacist interventions (DCPIs), detected medication errors (MEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

Results: A total of 6286 CPIs were extracted, of which DCPIs, MEs and ADRs accounted for 5701 (90.7%), 357 (5.7%) and 228 (3.6%) reports, respectively. The most prevalent DCPIs were drug therapy discontinuation (n = 1080, 18.9%). Antimicrobials were the most common medications associated with DCPIs (n = 1991, 34.9%). Physicians accepted 99.4% of DCPIs and 64.1% (n = 3656) of direct interventions were considered significant. Among detected MEs, antimicrobials were the most reported medications (n = 158, 44.3%), with pharmacy internal errors being the most prevalent cause of the events (n = 172, 48.2%). Among the reported ADRs, hematological reactions were the most common (n = 81, 35.5%), and antineoplastic agents were the most frequently associated medications with ADRs (n = 164, 71.9%).

Conclusion: This study highlights the crucial role of clinical pharmacists in managing leukemia patients, emphasizing their key interventions and ability to identify MEs and ADRs. Further research is needed to explore the clinical outcomes and financial impact of their involvement.

对白血病住院服务中临床药学干预措施的定性分析。
简介:白血病是一种复杂的血液恶性肿瘤,需要采用多学科治疗方法,临床药剂师在其中发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,他们在临床实践中的参与并没有在文献中得到充分记录。本研究旨在探讨临床药师报告的临床药学干预(CPIs)的特点:这项回顾性研究涉及提取 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月期间输入药学文档数据库 "Quantifi®"的 CPI。这些 CPI 包括临床药师直接干预 (DCPI)、检测到的用药错误 (ME) 和药物不良反应 (ADR):共提取了 6286 份 CPI,其中 DCPI、ME 和 ADR 报告分别占 5701 份(90.7%)、357 份(5.7%)和 228 份(3.6%)。最常见的 DCPIs 是药物治疗中断(1080 例,18.9%)。抗菌药物是与 DCPIs 相关的最常见药物(n = 1991,34.9%)。医生接受了 99.4% 的 DCPIs,64.1%(n = 3656)的直接干预被认为是有意义的。在检测到的 MEs 中,抗菌药物是报告最多的药物(n = 158,44.3%),药房内部错误是最常见的事件原因(n = 172,48.2%)。在报告的不良反应中,血液学反应最为常见(n = 81,35.5%),抗肿瘤药物是最常发生不良反应的药物(n = 164,71.9%):本研究强调了临床药剂师在管理白血病患者中的关键作用,强调了他们的关键干预措施以及识别 ME 和 ADR 的能力。需要进一步开展研究,探讨药剂师参与的临床结果和经济影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信