A case series and review of stereotactic body radiation therapy for contiguous multilevel spine metastases.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
S Adida, S Taori, S Bhatia, M R Kann, S A Burton, J C Flickinger, A C Olson, R K Sefcik, Pascal O Zinn, Peter C Gerszten
{"title":"A case series and review of stereotactic body radiation therapy for contiguous multilevel spine metastases.","authors":"S Adida, S Taori, S Bhatia, M R Kann, S A Burton, J C Flickinger, A C Olson, R K Sefcik, Pascal O Zinn, Peter C Gerszten","doi":"10.1007/s11060-024-04863-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A majority of published series report on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for 1-2 contiguous vertebral levels due to concerns regarding setup accuracy and radiation toxicity. This study evaluates patients with metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous levels treated with SBRT and augments its findings with a review of other studies investigating multilevel spine SBRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of a prospectively collected database of 49 patients with 55 metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous vertebral levels treated with SBRT at a single institution (2002-2023) was performed. Outcomes identified included local failure (LF), pain response, overall survival, and toxicity. The median single-fraction prescription dose was 15 Gy (range: 8-18); multifractionated treatment utilized prescription doses of 18-30 Gy in 2-5 fractions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up was 7 months (range: 1-103). The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year cumulative incidence rates of LF were 7%, 11%, and 11%, respectively. No prognostic factors were associated with LF. Pain was reported to improve or remain stable for 49 lesions (89%). Ten adverse radiation events (18%) were identified; pain flare (5%), dermatitis (4%), and vertebral compression fracture (VCF, 9%). The 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year cumulative incidence rates of VCF were 4%, 7%, and 7%, respectively. No instances of esophageal toxicity or myelopathy were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study of multilevel SBRT is one of the largest to investigate outcomes in this challenging clinical scenario. Spine SBRT confers low rates of LF and toxicity for patients with multilevel disease, which was previously considered a relative contraindication. Spine SBRT may be considered in this patient population instead of low-dose palliative RT.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04863-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A majority of published series report on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for 1-2 contiguous vertebral levels due to concerns regarding setup accuracy and radiation toxicity. This study evaluates patients with metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous levels treated with SBRT and augments its findings with a review of other studies investigating multilevel spine SBRT.

Methods: Analysis of a prospectively collected database of 49 patients with 55 metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous vertebral levels treated with SBRT at a single institution (2002-2023) was performed. Outcomes identified included local failure (LF), pain response, overall survival, and toxicity. The median single-fraction prescription dose was 15 Gy (range: 8-18); multifractionated treatment utilized prescription doses of 18-30 Gy in 2-5 fractions.

Results: Median follow-up was 7 months (range: 1-103). The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year cumulative incidence rates of LF were 7%, 11%, and 11%, respectively. No prognostic factors were associated with LF. Pain was reported to improve or remain stable for 49 lesions (89%). Ten adverse radiation events (18%) were identified; pain flare (5%), dermatitis (4%), and vertebral compression fracture (VCF, 9%). The 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year cumulative incidence rates of VCF were 4%, 7%, and 7%, respectively. No instances of esophageal toxicity or myelopathy were observed.

Conclusions: This study of multilevel SBRT is one of the largest to investigate outcomes in this challenging clinical scenario. Spine SBRT confers low rates of LF and toxicity for patients with multilevel disease, which was previously considered a relative contraindication. Spine SBRT may be considered in this patient population instead of low-dose palliative RT.

连续多水平脊柱转移瘤立体定向体放射治疗的病例系列和回顾。
目的:由于对设置准确性和辐射毒性的担忧,大多数已发表的系列研究报告都是针对1-2个连续椎体水平的立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)。本研究评估了接受SBRT治疗的椎体转移≥3个连续水平的患者,并对其他研究多水平脊柱SBRT的结果进行了回顾:方法:对前瞻性收集的数据库进行分析,该数据库包含在一家机构接受SBRT治疗的49例55个连续椎体水平≥3个的转移瘤患者(2002-2023年)。确定的结果包括局部失败(LF)、疼痛反应、总生存率和毒性。单次分次处方剂量的中位数为15 Gy(范围:8-18);多分次治疗的处方剂量为18-30 Gy,分2-5次进行:中位随访时间为 7 个月(范围:1-103)。6个月、1年和2年的LF累积发病率分别为7%、11%和11%。没有预后因素与 LF 相关。据报告,49 例病变(89%)的疼痛有所改善或保持稳定。共发现 10 例放射不良事件(18%):疼痛复发(5%)、皮炎(4%)和椎体压缩性骨折(VCF,9%)。椎体压缩性骨折的 3 个月、6 个月和 1 年累计发生率分别为 4%、7% 和 7%。未观察到食管毒性或脊髓病变:这项关于多水平 SBRT 的研究是在这种具有挑战性的临床情况下进行的规模最大的成果研究之一。脊柱SBRT为多层次疾病患者带来了低LF率和低毒性,而多层次疾病以前被认为是相对禁忌症。脊柱SBRT可替代低剂量姑息性RT用于此类患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信