Long-term health outcomes of COVID-19 in ICU- and non-ICU-treated patients up to 2 years after hospitalization: a longitudinal cohort study (CO-FLOW).

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
J C Berentschot, L M Bek, M H Heijenbrok-Kal, J van Bommel, G M Ribbers, J G J V Aerts, M E Hellemons, H J G van den Berg-Emons
{"title":"Long-term health outcomes of COVID-19 in ICU- and non-ICU-treated patients up to 2 years after hospitalization: a longitudinal cohort study (CO-FLOW).","authors":"J C Berentschot, L M Bek, M H Heijenbrok-Kal, J van Bommel, G M Ribbers, J G J V Aerts, M E Hellemons, H J G van den Berg-Emons","doi":"10.1186/s40560-024-00748-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients hospitalized for COVID-19 experience long-term health problems, but comprehensive longitudinal data up to 2 years remain limited. We aimed to (1) assess 2-year trajectories of health outcomes, including comparison between intensive care unit (ICU) treated and non-ICU-treated patients, and (2) identify risk factors for prominent health problems post-hospitalization for COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CO-FLOW multicenter prospective cohort study followed adults hospitalized for COVID-19 at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-discharge. Measurements included patient-reported outcomes (a.o., recovery, symptoms, fatigue, mental health, sleep quality, return to work, health-related quality of life [HRQoL]), and objective cognitive and physical tests. Additionally, routine follow-up data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>650 patients (median age 60.0 [IQR 53.0-67.0] years; 449/650 [69%] male) surviving hospitalization for COVID-19 were included, of whom 273/650 (42%) received ICU treatment. Overall, outcomes improved over time. Nonetheless, 73% (322/443) of patients had not completely recovered from COVID-19, with memory problems (274/443; 55%), concentration problems (259/443; 52%), and dyspnea (251/493; 51%) among most frequently reported symptoms at 2 years. Moreover, 61% (259/427) had poor sleep quality, 51% (222/433) fatigue, 23% (102/438) cognitive failures, and 30% (65/216) did not fully return to work. Objective outcome measures showed generally good physical recovery. Most outcomes were comparable between ICU- and non-ICU-treated patients at 2 years. However, ICU-treated patients tended to show slower recovery in neurocognitive symptoms, mental health outcomes, and resuming work than non-ICU-treated patients, while showing more improvements in physical outcomes. Particularly, female sex and/or pre-existing pulmonary disease were major risk factors for poorer outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>73% (322/443) of patients had not completely recovered from COVID-19 by 2 years. Despite good physical recovery, long-term neurocognitive complaints, dyspnea, fatigue, and impaired sleep quality persisted. ICU-treated patients showed slower recovery in neurocognitive and mental health outcomes and resumption of work. Tailoring long-term COVID-19 aftercare to individual residual needs is essential. Follow-up is required to monitor further recovery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NL8710, registration date 12-06-2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"12 1","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-024-00748-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many patients hospitalized for COVID-19 experience long-term health problems, but comprehensive longitudinal data up to 2 years remain limited. We aimed to (1) assess 2-year trajectories of health outcomes, including comparison between intensive care unit (ICU) treated and non-ICU-treated patients, and (2) identify risk factors for prominent health problems post-hospitalization for COVID-19.

Methods: The CO-FLOW multicenter prospective cohort study followed adults hospitalized for COVID-19 at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-discharge. Measurements included patient-reported outcomes (a.o., recovery, symptoms, fatigue, mental health, sleep quality, return to work, health-related quality of life [HRQoL]), and objective cognitive and physical tests. Additionally, routine follow-up data were collected.

Results: 650 patients (median age 60.0 [IQR 53.0-67.0] years; 449/650 [69%] male) surviving hospitalization for COVID-19 were included, of whom 273/650 (42%) received ICU treatment. Overall, outcomes improved over time. Nonetheless, 73% (322/443) of patients had not completely recovered from COVID-19, with memory problems (274/443; 55%), concentration problems (259/443; 52%), and dyspnea (251/493; 51%) among most frequently reported symptoms at 2 years. Moreover, 61% (259/427) had poor sleep quality, 51% (222/433) fatigue, 23% (102/438) cognitive failures, and 30% (65/216) did not fully return to work. Objective outcome measures showed generally good physical recovery. Most outcomes were comparable between ICU- and non-ICU-treated patients at 2 years. However, ICU-treated patients tended to show slower recovery in neurocognitive symptoms, mental health outcomes, and resuming work than non-ICU-treated patients, while showing more improvements in physical outcomes. Particularly, female sex and/or pre-existing pulmonary disease were major risk factors for poorer outcomes.

Conclusions: 73% (322/443) of patients had not completely recovered from COVID-19 by 2 years. Despite good physical recovery, long-term neurocognitive complaints, dyspnea, fatigue, and impaired sleep quality persisted. ICU-treated patients showed slower recovery in neurocognitive and mental health outcomes and resumption of work. Tailoring long-term COVID-19 aftercare to individual residual needs is essential. Follow-up is required to monitor further recovery.

Trial registration: NL8710, registration date 12-06-2020.

COVID-19对重症监护室和非重症监护室患者住院两年后的长期健康影响:纵向队列研究(CO-FLOW)。
背景:许多因 COVID-19 而住院的患者会出现长期健康问题,但是长达 2 年的全面纵向数据仍然有限。我们的目的是:(1)评估两年的健康结果轨迹,包括重症监护室(ICU)治疗患者与非重症监护室治疗患者之间的比较;(2)确定 COVID-19 患者住院后出现突出健康问题的风险因素:CO-FLOW 多中心前瞻性队列研究对因 COVID-19 住院的成人进行了出院后 3、6、12 和 24 个月的随访。测量项目包括患者报告的结果(其他、康复、症状、疲劳、心理健康、睡眠质量、重返工作岗位、与健康相关的生活质量 [HRQoL])以及客观认知和体能测试。此外,还收集了常规随访数据:共纳入650名因COVID-19住院的患者(中位年龄60.0 [IQR 53.0-67.0]岁;男性449/650 [69%]),其中273/650(42%)接受了ICU治疗。总体而言,随着时间的推移,治疗效果有所改善。尽管如此,73%(322/443)的患者仍未从 COVID-19 中完全康复,其中记忆力问题(274/443;55%)、注意力不集中(259/443;52%)和呼吸困难(251/493;51%)是患者两年后最常报告的症状。此外,61%(259/427)的患者睡眠质量不佳,51%(222/433)的患者感到疲劳,23%(102/438)的患者认知能力下降,30%(65/216)的患者未能完全重返工作岗位。客观结果显示,患者的身体恢复情况普遍良好。接受重症监护室治疗和未接受重症监护室治疗的患者在 2 年后的大多数疗效相当。不过,与非重症监护室治疗的患者相比,重症监护室治疗的患者在神经认知症状、精神健康状况和恢复工作方面的恢复速度往往较慢,而在身体状况方面则有更多改善。尤其是女性和/或原有肺部疾病是导致疗效较差的主要风险因素:73%(322/443)的患者在COVID-19治疗两年后仍未完全康复。尽管身体恢复良好,但长期的神经认知症状、呼吸困难、疲劳和睡眠质量受损依然存在。接受过重症监护室治疗的患者在神经认知、心理健康和恢复工作方面的恢复速度较慢。根据个体残余需求调整 COVID-19 的长期术后护理至关重要。需要进行随访以监测进一步的恢复情况:试验注册:NL8710,注册日期:2020年6月12日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信