Healthcare costs and resource utilization of patients with chronic post-traumatic stress disorder: a retrospective US claims analysis of commercially insured patients.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Filip Stanicic, Vladimir Zah, Dimitrije Grbic, Debra de Angelo, Wendy Bibeau
{"title":"Healthcare costs and resource utilization of patients with chronic post-traumatic stress disorder: a retrospective US claims analysis of commercially insured patients.","authors":"Filip Stanicic, Vladimir Zah, Dimitrije Grbic, Debra de Angelo, Wendy Bibeau","doi":"10.57264/cer-2024-0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Exploring the healthcare costs and resource use among privately insured US patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). <b>Methods:</b> This study used Merative MarketScan data. The index date was defined as the first PTSD claim. Study period included a 1-year pre-index and 2-year post-index follow-up. Cases with only acute PTSD, cancer, or insurance gap during the study period were excluded. The PTSD with (PwC) and PTSD without comorbidities (PwoC) cohorts were defined by the presence/absence of comorbid mental health conditions (schizophrenia, bipolar and major depressive disorder). Baseline PTSD (BP) cohort included PwoC cases with only index PTSD event and without FDA-approved PTSD medications or psychotherapy. Sub-analysis is conducted among patients with PTSD and substance/alcohol use disorder. Study cohorts were matched in a 1:1:1 ratio. <b>Results:</b> The matched sample included 5076 patients (1681 PwC, 1681 PwoC, 1714 BP). PwC patients had higher 2-year PTSD-related costs than PwoC and BP patients ($3762 vs $1750 and $841; all p < 0.001). The same trend was noted among all-cause and anxiety-related costs. PwC patients had higher 2-year PTSD-related inpatient and emergency department (ED) rates than PwoC (10.2% vs 1.7% and 6.8% vs 2.6%, all p < 0.001) and inpatient and outpatient rates than BP (10.2% vs 2.1% and 98.0% vs 93.1%; all p ≤ 0.004). The sub-analysis had 3776 patients (3154 PwC, 537 PwoC, 85 BP). PwC had higher 2-year PTSD-related costs than PwoC and BP ($7668 vs $2919 and $1,483; all p < 0.001). The same trend was noted in all-cause and anxiety-related costs. PwC also had higher 2-year PTSD-related inpatient and ED rates than PwoC (25.6% vs 10.4% and 12.7% vs 5.2%; all p < 0.001) and inpatient and outpatient rates than BP (25.6% vs 8.2% and 95.5% vs 84.7%; all p < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> PTSD is associated with high healthcare costs and resource use. The highest economic burden was observed in patients with PTSD and mental health comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e240058"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Exploring the healthcare costs and resource use among privately insured US patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Methods: This study used Merative MarketScan data. The index date was defined as the first PTSD claim. Study period included a 1-year pre-index and 2-year post-index follow-up. Cases with only acute PTSD, cancer, or insurance gap during the study period were excluded. The PTSD with (PwC) and PTSD without comorbidities (PwoC) cohorts were defined by the presence/absence of comorbid mental health conditions (schizophrenia, bipolar and major depressive disorder). Baseline PTSD (BP) cohort included PwoC cases with only index PTSD event and without FDA-approved PTSD medications or psychotherapy. Sub-analysis is conducted among patients with PTSD and substance/alcohol use disorder. Study cohorts were matched in a 1:1:1 ratio. Results: The matched sample included 5076 patients (1681 PwC, 1681 PwoC, 1714 BP). PwC patients had higher 2-year PTSD-related costs than PwoC and BP patients ($3762 vs $1750 and $841; all p < 0.001). The same trend was noted among all-cause and anxiety-related costs. PwC patients had higher 2-year PTSD-related inpatient and emergency department (ED) rates than PwoC (10.2% vs 1.7% and 6.8% vs 2.6%, all p < 0.001) and inpatient and outpatient rates than BP (10.2% vs 2.1% and 98.0% vs 93.1%; all p ≤ 0.004). The sub-analysis had 3776 patients (3154 PwC, 537 PwoC, 85 BP). PwC had higher 2-year PTSD-related costs than PwoC and BP ($7668 vs $2919 and $1,483; all p < 0.001). The same trend was noted in all-cause and anxiety-related costs. PwC also had higher 2-year PTSD-related inpatient and ED rates than PwoC (25.6% vs 10.4% and 12.7% vs 5.2%; all p < 0.001) and inpatient and outpatient rates than BP (25.6% vs 8.2% and 95.5% vs 84.7%; all p < 0.001). Conclusion: PTSD is associated with high healthcare costs and resource use. The highest economic burden was observed in patients with PTSD and mental health comorbidities.

慢性创伤后应激障碍患者的医疗费用和资源利用情况:对美国商业保险患者的索赔进行回顾性分析。
目的:探讨美国私人投保的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者的医疗费用和资源使用情况。研究方法本研究使用 Merative MarketScan 数据。指数日期定义为首次 PTSD 索赔。研究期间包括指数前 1 年和指数后 2 年的随访。研究期间仅患有急性创伤后应激障碍、癌症或保险缺口的病例被排除在外。患有创伤后应激障碍(PwC)和无合并症创伤后应激障碍(PwoC)组群是根据是否患有合并症精神疾病(精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症)来定义的。基线创伤后应激障碍(BP)队列包括仅有指数创伤后应激障碍事件且未接受 FDA 批准的创伤后应激障碍药物或心理治疗的 PwoC 病例。子分析在创伤后应激障碍和药物/酒精使用障碍患者中进行。研究队列以 1:1:1 的比例进行匹配。研究结果匹配样本包括 5076 名患者(1681 名 PwC,1681 名 PwoC,1714 名 BP)。PwC 患者 2 年的创伤后应激障碍相关费用高于 PwoC 和 BP 患者(3762 美元 vs 1750 美元和 841 美元;均为 p 结论:创伤后应激障碍与高额医疗费用有关:创伤后应激障碍与高昂的医疗费用和资源使用相关。有创伤后应激障碍和精神健康合并症的患者的经济负担最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of comparative effectiveness research
Journal of comparative effectiveness research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides a rapid-publication platform for debate, and for the presentation of new findings and research methodologies. Through rigorous evaluation and comprehensive coverage, the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides stakeholders (including patients, clinicians, healthcare purchasers, and health policy makers) with the key data and opinions to make informed and specific decisions on clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信