Efficacy and safety of digital nerve block for pain management during sharp debridement of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: A prospective observational study.

IF 1.4 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Riccardo Bixio, Francesca Mastropaolo, Francesca Nava, Olta Veliaj, Elena Fracassi, Ombretta Viapiana, Maurizio Rossini, Luca Idolazzi
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of digital nerve block for pain management during sharp debridement of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: A prospective observational study.","authors":"Riccardo Bixio, Francesca Mastropaolo, Francesca Nava, Olta Veliaj, Elena Fracassi, Ombretta Viapiana, Maurizio Rossini, Luca Idolazzi","doi":"10.1177/23971983241285206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by fibrosis and vascular abnormalities, often leading to the development of digital ulcers (DUs). DUs are painful and debilitating, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Effective pain management during debridement is crucial, yet there is no consensus on the optimal approach. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of digital nerve block (DNB) using lidocaine and mepivacaine for pain control during sharp debridement of DUs in SSc patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted from September 2023 to May 2024 at the Rheumatology Operating Unit, University of Verona. Patients were randomized to receive either 1 mL of 2% lidocaine or 2% mepivacaine for DNB. Pain levels were assessed using a categorical grading scale during the injection and debridement. The outcomes were pain control and performance of lidocaine versus mepivacaine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort developed 46 ulcers. The pain was abolished in almost all patients. Lidocaine achieved faster anaesthesia (127.92 ± 34.32 s) compared with mepivacaine (252.65 ± 49.89 s, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Mepivacaine resulted in less pain during injection (<i>p</i> = 0.006). No significant difference in pain levels during debridement was observed between the two anaesthetics. Three mild adverse effects (Raynaud's phenomenon) were reported. All procedures were completed successfully, and 35 ulcers healed with a mean time of 6.1 ± 7.77 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DNB with mepivacaine provides effective pain control during DU debridement in SSc patients, with lower injection site pain and comparable efficacy to lidocaine. The procedure is safe, well-tolerated and facilitates successful ulcer healing. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"23971983241285206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23971983241285206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by fibrosis and vascular abnormalities, often leading to the development of digital ulcers (DUs). DUs are painful and debilitating, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Effective pain management during debridement is crucial, yet there is no consensus on the optimal approach. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of digital nerve block (DNB) using lidocaine and mepivacaine for pain control during sharp debridement of DUs in SSc patients.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted from September 2023 to May 2024 at the Rheumatology Operating Unit, University of Verona. Patients were randomized to receive either 1 mL of 2% lidocaine or 2% mepivacaine for DNB. Pain levels were assessed using a categorical grading scale during the injection and debridement. The outcomes were pain control and performance of lidocaine versus mepivacaine.

Results: The cohort developed 46 ulcers. The pain was abolished in almost all patients. Lidocaine achieved faster anaesthesia (127.92 ± 34.32 s) compared with mepivacaine (252.65 ± 49.89 s, p < 0.001). Mepivacaine resulted in less pain during injection (p = 0.006). No significant difference in pain levels during debridement was observed between the two anaesthetics. Three mild adverse effects (Raynaud's phenomenon) were reported. All procedures were completed successfully, and 35 ulcers healed with a mean time of 6.1 ± 7.77 weeks.

Conclusions: DNB with mepivacaine provides effective pain control during DU debridement in SSc patients, with lower injection site pain and comparable efficacy to lidocaine. The procedure is safe, well-tolerated and facilitates successful ulcer healing. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to confirm these findings.

在系统性硬化症患者的数字溃疡锐性清创过程中使用数字神经阻滞止痛的有效性和安全性:前瞻性观察研究。
简介系统性硬化症(SSc)是一种以纤维化和血管异常为特征的慢性自身免疫性疾病,通常会导致数字溃疡(DU)的发生。数字溃疡会给患者带来疼痛并使其衰弱,严重影响患者的生活质量。清创过程中有效的止痛方法至关重要,但目前尚未就最佳方法达成共识。本研究评估了使用利多卡因和甲哌卡因进行数字神经阻滞(DNB)以控制 SSc 患者 DUs 锐性清创过程中疼痛的有效性和安全性:这项前瞻性观察研究于 2023 年 9 月至 2024 年 5 月在维罗纳大学风湿病手术室进行。患者随机接受 1 mL 2% 利多卡因或 2% 甲哌卡因进行 DNB。在注射和清创过程中,使用分类分级表对疼痛程度进行评估。结果为疼痛控制和利多卡因与甲哌卡因的效果对比:结果:患者共出现 46 处溃疡。几乎所有患者都消除了疼痛。利多卡因的麻醉速度(127.92 ± 34.32 秒)快于甲哌卡因(252.65 ± 49.89 秒,P = 0.006)。两种麻醉剂在清创过程中的疼痛程度无明显差异。有三例轻微不良反应(雷诺现象)的报告。所有手术均顺利完成,35 处溃疡愈合,平均愈合时间为 6.1 ± 7.77 周:结论:使用甲哌卡因进行 DNB 可有效控制 SSc 患者 DU 清除术中的疼痛,注射部位疼痛较轻,疗效与利多卡因相当。该手术安全、耐受性良好,并能促进溃疡成功愈合。为了证实这些研究结果,有必要进行更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信