Complication Rates After Ultrasonography-Guided Nerve Blocks Performed in the Emergency Department.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Andrew Goldsmith, Lachlan Driver, Nicole M Duggan, Matthew Riscinti, David Martin, Michael Heffler, Hamid Shokoohi, Andrea Dreyfuss, Jordan Sell, Calvin Brown, Christopher Fung, Leland Perice, Daniel Bennett, Natalie Truong, S Zan Jafry, Michael Macias, Joseph Brown, Arun Nagdev
{"title":"Complication Rates After Ultrasonography-Guided Nerve Blocks Performed in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Andrew Goldsmith, Lachlan Driver, Nicole M Duggan, Matthew Riscinti, David Martin, Michael Heffler, Hamid Shokoohi, Andrea Dreyfuss, Jordan Sell, Calvin Brown, Christopher Fung, Leland Perice, Daniel Bennett, Natalie Truong, S Zan Jafry, Michael Macias, Joseph Brown, Arun Nagdev","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Ultrasonography-guided nerve blocks (UGNBs) have become a core component of multimodal analgesia for acute pain management in the emergency department (ED). Despite their growing use, national adoption of UGNBs has been slow due to a lack of procedural safety in the ED.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the complication rates and patient pain scores of UGNBs performed in the ED.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study included data from the National Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block Registry, a retrospective multicenter observational registry encompassing procedures performed in 11 EDs in the US from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023, of adult patients who underwent a UGNB.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>UGNB encounters.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome of this study was complication rates associated with ED-performed UGNBs recorded in the National Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block Registry from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. The secondary outcome was patient pain scores of ED-based UGNBs. Data for all adult patients who underwent an ED-based UGNB at each site were recorded. The volume of UGNB at each site, as well as procedural outcomes (including complications), were recorded. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics of all variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2735 UGNB encounters among adult patients (median age, 62 years [IQR, 41-77 years]; 51.6% male) across 11 EDs nationwide were analyzed. Fascia iliaca blocks were the most commonly performed UGNBs (975 of 2742 blocks [35.6%]). Complications occurred at a rate of 0.4% (10 of 2735 blocks). One episode of local anesthetic systemic toxicity requiring an intralipid was reported. Overall, 1320 of 1864 patients (70.8%) experienced 51% to 100% pain relief following UGNBs. Operator training level varied, although 1953 of 2733 procedures (71.5%) were performed by resident physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings of this cohort study of 2735 UGNB encounters support the safety of UGNBs in ED settings and suggest an association with improvement in patient pain scores. Broader implementation of UGNBs in ED settings may have important implications as key elements of multimodal analgesia strategies to reduce opioid use and improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2444742"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44742","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Ultrasonography-guided nerve blocks (UGNBs) have become a core component of multimodal analgesia for acute pain management in the emergency department (ED). Despite their growing use, national adoption of UGNBs has been slow due to a lack of procedural safety in the ED.

Objective: To assess the complication rates and patient pain scores of UGNBs performed in the ED.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study included data from the National Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block Registry, a retrospective multicenter observational registry encompassing procedures performed in 11 EDs in the US from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023, of adult patients who underwent a UGNB.

Exposure: UGNB encounters.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome of this study was complication rates associated with ED-performed UGNBs recorded in the National Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block Registry from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. The secondary outcome was patient pain scores of ED-based UGNBs. Data for all adult patients who underwent an ED-based UGNB at each site were recorded. The volume of UGNB at each site, as well as procedural outcomes (including complications), were recorded. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics of all variables.

Results: In total, 2735 UGNB encounters among adult patients (median age, 62 years [IQR, 41-77 years]; 51.6% male) across 11 EDs nationwide were analyzed. Fascia iliaca blocks were the most commonly performed UGNBs (975 of 2742 blocks [35.6%]). Complications occurred at a rate of 0.4% (10 of 2735 blocks). One episode of local anesthetic systemic toxicity requiring an intralipid was reported. Overall, 1320 of 1864 patients (70.8%) experienced 51% to 100% pain relief following UGNBs. Operator training level varied, although 1953 of 2733 procedures (71.5%) were performed by resident physicians.

Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this cohort study of 2735 UGNB encounters support the safety of UGNBs in ED settings and suggest an association with improvement in patient pain scores. Broader implementation of UGNBs in ED settings may have important implications as key elements of multimodal analgesia strategies to reduce opioid use and improve patient care.

急诊科在超声引导下进行神经阻滞术后的并发症发生率。
重要性:超声引导下神经阻滞(UGNB)已成为急诊科(ED)急性疼痛治疗中多模式镇痛的核心组成部分。尽管超声引导神经阻滞的应用越来越广泛,但由于急诊科缺乏手术安全性,因此在全国范围内的应用进展缓慢:评估在急诊室实施 UGNB 的并发症发生率和患者疼痛评分:这项队列研究纳入了美国国家超声引导神经阻滞注册中心的数据,该注册中心是一个回顾性多中心观察注册中心,涵盖了2022年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间在美国11家急诊室进行的UGNB成人患者手术:本研究的主要结果是2022年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间国家超声引导神经阻滞注册中心记录的由急诊室实施的UGNB相关并发症发生率。次要研究结果是基于急诊室的 UGNB 患者疼痛评分。记录了在每个地点接受 ED 型 UGNB 的所有成年患者的数据。记录了每个地点的 UGNB 量以及手术结果(包括并发症)。数据分析采用了所有变量的描述性统计方法:共分析了全国 11 家急诊室的 2735 名成年患者(中位年龄 62 岁 [IQR,41-77 岁];51.6% 为男性)的 UGNB 就诊情况。髂筋膜阻滞是最常见的 UGNB(2742 例阻滞中的 975 例 [35.6%])。并发症发生率为 0.4%(2735 例阻滞中有 10 例)。据报道,有一次局部麻醉剂全身中毒,需要注射内脂。总体而言,1864 位患者中有 1320 位(70.8%)在接受 UGNB 后疼痛缓解率为 51% 至 100% 不等。操作者的培训水平各不相同,但 2733 例手术中有 1953 例(71.5%)是由住院医生实施的:这项对 2735 例 UGNB 患者进行的队列研究结果表明,在急诊室环境中使用 UGNB 是安全的,并且与患者疼痛评分的改善有关。在急诊室环境中更广泛地实施 UGNB 可能具有重要意义,因为它是多模式镇痛策略的关键要素,可减少阿片类药物的使用并改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信