The Persistence of Biologic Therapies for Psoriatic Arthritis: A Narrative Review.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Magdalena Jasmen, Dominga García, Sebastián Ibáñez, Pamela Díaz
{"title":"The Persistence of Biologic Therapies for Psoriatic Arthritis: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Magdalena Jasmen, Dominga García, Sebastián Ibáñez, Pamela Díaz","doi":"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Drug persistence is a crucial measure of long-term efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction. Lack of persistence can increase healthcare costs and morbidity and mortality rates. This review aimed to consolidate available data on drug persistence for various biological treatments used as the primary intervention for psoriatic arthritis and identify factors associated with nonpersistence. Reports indicate variable 1-year persistence rates for biologic therapies, ranging from 37% to 73%. Specifically, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors have shown fluctuating 1-year persistence rates ranging from 32% to 85%. IL-12/23 and IL-23 inhibitors demonstrate persistence rates of 25% to 89%, whereas data for IL-17 and JAK inhibitors are more limited, ranging from 51% to 77%. Factors such as female sex and a higher burden of comorbidities have been associated with an increased risk of nonpersistence, although evidence regarding other factors remains scarce. The significant variability in reported persistence rates may be attributed to differences in treatment gaps and methodologies across studies. Addressing and mitigating the factors leading to nonpersistence is essential for improving treatment outcomes in psoriatic arthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14745,"journal":{"name":"JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Drug persistence is a crucial measure of long-term efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction. Lack of persistence can increase healthcare costs and morbidity and mortality rates. This review aimed to consolidate available data on drug persistence for various biological treatments used as the primary intervention for psoriatic arthritis and identify factors associated with nonpersistence. Reports indicate variable 1-year persistence rates for biologic therapies, ranging from 37% to 73%. Specifically, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors have shown fluctuating 1-year persistence rates ranging from 32% to 85%. IL-12/23 and IL-23 inhibitors demonstrate persistence rates of 25% to 89%, whereas data for IL-17 and JAK inhibitors are more limited, ranging from 51% to 77%. Factors such as female sex and a higher burden of comorbidities have been associated with an increased risk of nonpersistence, although evidence regarding other factors remains scarce. The significant variability in reported persistence rates may be attributed to differences in treatment gaps and methodologies across studies. Addressing and mitigating the factors leading to nonpersistence is essential for improving treatment outcomes in psoriatic arthritis.

银屑病关节炎生物疗法的持久性:叙述性综述。
摘要:药物的持久性是衡量药物长期疗效、安全性和患者满意度的关键指标。缺乏持久性会增加医疗成本、发病率和死亡率。本综述旨在整合作为银屑病关节炎主要干预措施的各种生物疗法的药物持续性数据,并确定与不持续性相关的因素。报告显示,生物疗法的 1 年持续率各不相同,从 37% 到 73% 不等。具体而言,肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂的 1 年持续率从 32% 到 85% 不等。IL-12/23和IL-23抑制剂的持续率从25%到89%不等,而IL-17和JAK抑制剂的数据则较为有限,从51%到77%不等。女性性别和合并症负担较重等因素与不耐受风险增加有关,但有关其他因素的证据仍然很少。报告的持续率存在很大差异,这可能是由于不同研究的治疗差距和方法存在差异。要改善银屑病关节炎的治疗效果,就必须解决并减少导致不耐受的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology the peer-reviewed, bimonthly journal that rheumatologists asked for. Each issue contains practical information on patient care in a clinically oriented, easy-to-read format. Our commitment is to timely, relevant coverage of the topics and issues shaping current practice. We pack each issue with original articles, case reports, reviews, brief reports, expert commentary, letters to the editor, and more. This is where you''ll find the answers to tough patient management issues as well as the latest information about technological advances affecting your practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信