Rural-urban disparities and trends in cancer screening: an analysis of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data (2018-2022).

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Gabriel A Benavidez, Ami E Sedani, Tisha M Felder, Matthew Asare, Charles R Rogers
{"title":"Rural-urban disparities and trends in cancer screening: an analysis of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data (2018-2022).","authors":"Gabriel A Benavidez, Ami E Sedani, Tisha M Felder, Matthew Asare, Charles R Rogers","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite evidence of the benefit of routine cancer screenings, data show a concerning decline in cancer screening uptake for multiple cancers. This analysis aimed to examine rural-urban differences in recent trends for being up-to-date with screenings for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 2018, 2020, and 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data to assess up-to-date cancer screening status among eligible adults in the United States. We calculated weighted prevalence estimates overall and stratified by county-level rural-urban classification. We used survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression models to examine rural-urban disparities in cancer screening up-to-date status by year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence of being up-to-date with each cancer screening was lower in 2022 than it was in 2018. The largest decline in screening overall was for cervical cancer, which dropped from 81.89% in 2018 to 47.71% in 2022. Rural-urban disparities were observed for breast cancer screening from 2018 to 2022, with the odds of up-to-date screening being 14% to 27% lower for rural populations than for urban populations. For colorectal and cervical cancers, the odds of being up-to-date with screenings were lower for rural populations in 2018 and 2020, but no statistically significant difference was observed in 2022 (colorectal screening odds ratio = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.02; cervical screening odds ratio = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a concerning trend of decreasing uptake of cancer screenings that will challenge future efforts in cancer prevention and control. There is a need to better understand the factors contributing to the decline in cancer screening update.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite evidence of the benefit of routine cancer screenings, data show a concerning decline in cancer screening uptake for multiple cancers. This analysis aimed to examine rural-urban differences in recent trends for being up-to-date with screenings for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers.

Methods: We used 2018, 2020, and 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data to assess up-to-date cancer screening status among eligible adults in the United States. We calculated weighted prevalence estimates overall and stratified by county-level rural-urban classification. We used survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression models to examine rural-urban disparities in cancer screening up-to-date status by year.

Results: Prevalence of being up-to-date with each cancer screening was lower in 2022 than it was in 2018. The largest decline in screening overall was for cervical cancer, which dropped from 81.89% in 2018 to 47.71% in 2022. Rural-urban disparities were observed for breast cancer screening from 2018 to 2022, with the odds of up-to-date screening being 14% to 27% lower for rural populations than for urban populations. For colorectal and cervical cancers, the odds of being up-to-date with screenings were lower for rural populations in 2018 and 2020, but no statistically significant difference was observed in 2022 (colorectal screening odds ratio = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.02; cervical screening odds ratio = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.03).

Conclusion: There is a concerning trend of decreasing uptake of cancer screenings that will challenge future efforts in cancer prevention and control. There is a need to better understand the factors contributing to the decline in cancer screening update.

癌症筛查中的城乡差异与趋势:行为风险因素监测系统数据分析(2018-2022 年)》。
背景:尽管有证据表明常规癌症筛查有益,但数据显示多种癌症筛查的接受率下降令人担忧。这项分析旨在研究城乡居民在接受乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查方面的最新趋势差异:我们使用 2018 年、2020 年和 2022 年行为风险因素监测系统数据来评估符合条件的美国成年人的最新癌症筛查状况。我们计算了总体加权患病率估计值,并按县级城乡分类进行了分层。我们使用调查加权多变量逻辑回归模型来研究各年癌症筛查最新状态的城乡差异:2022年各项癌症筛查的最新筛查率均低于2018年。宫颈癌筛查总体下降幅度最大,从 2018 年的 81.89% 降至 2022 年的 47.71%。从 2018 年到 2022 年,在乳腺癌筛查方面观察到了城乡差异,农村人口的最新筛查几率比城市人口低 14% 到 27%。在结直肠癌和宫颈癌筛查方面,2018 年和 2020 年农村人口的最新筛查几率较低,但 2022 年没有观察到显著差异(结直肠癌筛查 OR = 0.96;95% CI:0.90,1.02)(宫颈癌筛查 OR = 0.97;95% CI:0.93,1.03):癌症筛查率下降的趋势令人担忧,这将对未来的癌症预防和控制工作提出挑战。需要努力更好地了解导致癌症筛查率下降的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信