Performance of Polygenic Risk Scores for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Populations of African Descent.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jennifer M Chang-Wolf, Tyler G Kinzy, Sjoerd J Driessen, Lauren A Cruz, Sudha K Iyengar, Neal S Peachey, Tin Aung, Chiea Chuen Khor, Susan E Williams, Michele Ramsay, Olusola Olawoye, Adeyinka Ashaye, Caroline C W Klaver, Michael A Hauser, Alberta A H J Thiadens, Jessica N Cooke Bailey, Pieter W M Bonnemaijer
{"title":"Performance of Polygenic Risk Scores for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Populations of African Descent.","authors":"Jennifer M Chang-Wolf, Tyler G Kinzy, Sjoerd J Driessen, Lauren A Cruz, Sudha K Iyengar, Neal S Peachey, Tin Aung, Chiea Chuen Khor, Susan E Williams, Michele Ramsay, Olusola Olawoye, Adeyinka Ashaye, Caroline C W Klaver, Michael A Hauser, Alberta A H J Thiadens, Jessica N Cooke Bailey, Pieter W M Bonnemaijer","doi":"10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.4784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) polygenic risk scores (PRSs) continue to be evaluated in primarily European-ancestry populations despite higher prevalence and worse outcomes in African-ancestry populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate how established POAG PRSs perform in African-ancestry samples from the Genetics in Glaucoma Patients of African Descent (GIGA), Genetics of Glaucoma in Individuals of African Descent (GGLAD), and Million Veteran Program (MVP) datasets and compare these with European-ancestry samples.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study of POAG cases and controls from Tanzania, South Africa, Nigeria, Ghana, and the US. Included were individuals of African descent from South Africa and Tanzania from the GIGA dataset; individuals of African descent from Ghana, Nigeria, and the US from the GGLAD dataset; and individuals of African or European descent from the US in the MVP dataset. Data were analyzed from January 2022 to July 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Three PRSs derived from large meta-analyses of European and Asian populations, namely Gharahkhani et al (Gharahkhani PRS), Han et al (Han PRS), and Craig et al (Craig PRS).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Odds ratios (ORs) for POAG risk stratification comparing the highest and lowest quintiles; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and liability coefficient of determination (R2) for the addition of PRS to a baseline of age, sex, and first 5 principal components.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 673 cases and 66 432 controls were included in this study across 7 ancestral groups. Mean (SD) age of the total participants was 76.9 (8.7) years, with 74 304 males (95.1%). The following were included in each dataset: GIGA (663 cases, 476 controls), GGLAD (1471 cases, 1482 controls), and MVP (9559 cases, 64 474 controls). Increases in ORs were found for the highest POAG risk quintile ranging from an OR of 1.68 (95% CI, 1.17-2.43) in Ghanaians to 7.05 (95% CI, 2.73-19.6) in the South African multiple ancestry group (which derives from at least 5 distinct ancestral groups: Khoisan, Bantus, Europeans, Indians, and Southeast Asians) with the Gharahkhani PRS. The Han PRS showed OR increases for the highest POAG risk quintile ranging from 2.27 (95% CI, 1.49-3.47) in African American individuals in the GGLAD dataset to 7.24 (95% CI, 6.47-8.12) in Europeans. The Craig PRS predicted OR increases in the highest quintile for all groups ranging from 1.51 (95% CI, 1.05-2.18) in Ghanaians to 6.31 (95% CI, 5.67-7.04) in Europeans. However, AUROC and R2 increases above baseline were lower for all African-ancestry compared with European-ancestry groups in the 3 tested PRSs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, despite some improvements in OR-based risk stratification using the Gharahkhani PRSs, Han PRSs, and Craig PRSs, consistently lower improvements in AUROC and R2 for African-ancestry compared with European-ancestry groups highlight the need for risk prediction models tailored to diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14518,"journal":{"name":"JAMA ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.4784","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) polygenic risk scores (PRSs) continue to be evaluated in primarily European-ancestry populations despite higher prevalence and worse outcomes in African-ancestry populations.

Objective: To evaluate how established POAG PRSs perform in African-ancestry samples from the Genetics in Glaucoma Patients of African Descent (GIGA), Genetics of Glaucoma in Individuals of African Descent (GGLAD), and Million Veteran Program (MVP) datasets and compare these with European-ancestry samples.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study of POAG cases and controls from Tanzania, South Africa, Nigeria, Ghana, and the US. Included were individuals of African descent from South Africa and Tanzania from the GIGA dataset; individuals of African descent from Ghana, Nigeria, and the US from the GGLAD dataset; and individuals of African or European descent from the US in the MVP dataset. Data were analyzed from January 2022 to July 2023.

Exposures: Three PRSs derived from large meta-analyses of European and Asian populations, namely Gharahkhani et al (Gharahkhani PRS), Han et al (Han PRS), and Craig et al (Craig PRS).

Main outcomes and measures: Odds ratios (ORs) for POAG risk stratification comparing the highest and lowest quintiles; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and liability coefficient of determination (R2) for the addition of PRS to a baseline of age, sex, and first 5 principal components.

Results: A total of 11 673 cases and 66 432 controls were included in this study across 7 ancestral groups. Mean (SD) age of the total participants was 76.9 (8.7) years, with 74 304 males (95.1%). The following were included in each dataset: GIGA (663 cases, 476 controls), GGLAD (1471 cases, 1482 controls), and MVP (9559 cases, 64 474 controls). Increases in ORs were found for the highest POAG risk quintile ranging from an OR of 1.68 (95% CI, 1.17-2.43) in Ghanaians to 7.05 (95% CI, 2.73-19.6) in the South African multiple ancestry group (which derives from at least 5 distinct ancestral groups: Khoisan, Bantus, Europeans, Indians, and Southeast Asians) with the Gharahkhani PRS. The Han PRS showed OR increases for the highest POAG risk quintile ranging from 2.27 (95% CI, 1.49-3.47) in African American individuals in the GGLAD dataset to 7.24 (95% CI, 6.47-8.12) in Europeans. The Craig PRS predicted OR increases in the highest quintile for all groups ranging from 1.51 (95% CI, 1.05-2.18) in Ghanaians to 6.31 (95% CI, 5.67-7.04) in Europeans. However, AUROC and R2 increases above baseline were lower for all African-ancestry compared with European-ancestry groups in the 3 tested PRSs.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cross-sectional study, despite some improvements in OR-based risk stratification using the Gharahkhani PRSs, Han PRSs, and Craig PRSs, consistently lower improvements in AUROC and R2 for African-ancestry compared with European-ancestry groups highlight the need for risk prediction models tailored to diverse populations.

原发性开角型青光眼多基因风险评分在非洲裔人群中的表现。
重要性:原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)多基因风险评分(PRSs)仍主要在欧洲裔人群中进行评估,尽管在非洲裔人群中发病率更高且结果更差:目的:评估已建立的 POAG PRS 在非洲裔青光眼患者遗传学(GIGA)、非洲裔青光眼遗传学(GGLAD)和百万退伍军人计划(MVP)数据集中的非洲裔样本中的表现,并与欧洲裔样本进行比较:这是一项多中心横断面研究,研究对象是来自坦桑尼亚、南非、尼日利亚、加纳和美国的 POAG 病例和对照组。研究对象包括 GIGA 数据集中来自南非和坦桑尼亚的非洲后裔;GGLAD 数据集中来自加纳、尼日利亚和美国的非洲后裔;MVP 数据集中来自美国的非洲或欧洲后裔。数据分析时间为 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月:三个PRS来自欧洲和亚洲人群的大型荟萃分析,即Gharahkhani等人(Gharahkhani PRS)、Han等人(Han PRS)和Craig等人(Craig PRS):主要结果和测量指标:比较最高和最低五分位数的 POAG 风险分层的比率(ORs);接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC);在年龄、性别和前 5 个主成分的基线上增加 PRS 的责任决定系数(R2):本研究共纳入 11 673 例病例和 66 432 例对照,涉及 7 个祖先群体。所有参与者的平均年龄(标准差)为 76.9(8.7)岁,其中男性 74 304 人(95.1%)。每个数据集包括以下内容:GIGA(663 例,476 例对照)、GGLAD(1471 例,1482 例对照)和 MVP(9559 例,64 474 例对照)。研究发现,POAG 风险最高的五分之一人群的 OR 值增加,加纳人的 OR 值为 1.68(95% CI,1.17-2.43),而南非多祖先群体(至少来自 5 个不同的祖先群体:在南非多祖先群体(至少来自 5 个不同的祖先群体:科伊桑人、班图人、欧洲人、印度人和东南亚人)中,Gharahkhani PRS 的 OR 值为 7.05(95% CI)。汉族 PRS 显示,在 GGLAD 数据集中,POAG 风险最高的五分之一人群的 OR 增加,从非裔美国人的 2.27(95% CI,1.49-3.47)到欧洲人的 7.24(95% CI,6.47-8.12)不等。克雷格 PRS 预测 OR 在所有群体中的最高五分位数都会增加,从加纳人的 1.51(95% CI,1.05-2.18)到欧洲人的 6.31(95% CI,5.67-7.04)不等。然而,在 3 个测试的 PRS 中,所有非洲裔群体与欧洲裔群体相比,AUROC 和 R2 在基线以上的增幅较低:在这项横断面研究中,尽管使用 Gharahkhani PRSs、Han PRSs 和 Craig PRSs 进行基于 OR 的风险分层有所改善,但与欧裔血统群体相比,非洲裔血统群体的 AUROC 和 R2 的改善幅度一直较低,这突出表明需要为不同人群量身定制风险预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA ophthalmology
JAMA ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
340
期刊介绍: JAMA Ophthalmology, with a rich history of continuous publication since 1869, stands as a distinguished international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to ophthalmology and visual science. In 2019, the journal proudly commemorated 150 years of uninterrupted service to the field. As a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, a consortium renowned for its peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Ophthalmology upholds the highest standards of excellence in disseminating cutting-edge research and insights. Join us in celebrating our legacy and advancing the frontiers of ophthalmology and visual science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信