Overtreatment of Prostate Cancer Among Men With Limited Longevity in the Active Surveillance Era.

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Timothy J Daskivich, Michael Luu, John Heard, I-Chun Thomas, John T Leppert
{"title":"Overtreatment of Prostate Cancer Among Men With Limited Longevity in the Active Surveillance Era.","authors":"Timothy J Daskivich, Michael Luu, John Heard, I-Chun Thomas, John T Leppert","doi":"10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Men with limited life expectancy (LE) have historically been overtreated for prostate cancer despite clear guideline recommendations. With increasing use of active surveillance, it is unclear if overtreatment of men with limited LE has persisted and how overtreatment varies by tumor risk and treatment type.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if rates of overtreatment of men with limited LE have persisted in the active surveillance era and whether overtreatment varies by tumor risk or treatment type.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study included men with clinically localized prostate cancer in the Veterans Affairs health system who received a diagnosis between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>LE was estimated using the validated age-adjusted Prostate Cancer Comorbidity Index (PCCI). Treatment trends among men with limited LE were assessed using a stratified linear and log-linear Poisson regression in aggregate and across PCCI and tumor risk subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) age for the study population of 243 928 men was 66.8 (8.0) years. A total of 50 045 (20.5%) and 11 366 (4.7%) men had an LE of less than 10 years and LE of less than 5 years based on PCCI scores of 5 or greater and 10 or greater, respectively. Among men with an LE of less than 10 years, the proportion of men treated with definitive treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) for low-risk disease decreased from 37.4% to 14.7% (absolute change, -22.7%; 95% CI, -30.0% to -15.4%) but increased for intermediate-risk disease from 37.6% to 59.8% (22.1%; 95% CI, 14.8%-29.4%) from 2000 to 2019, with increases observed for favorable (32.8%-57.8%) unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (46.1%-65.2%). Among men with an LE of less than 10 years who were receiving definitive therapy, the predominant treatment was radiotherapy (78%). Among men with an LE of less than 10 years, use of radiotherapy increased from 31.3% to 44.9% (13.6%; 95% CI, 8.5%-18.7%) for intermediate-risk disease from 2000 to 2019, with increases observed for favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease. Among men with an LE of less than 5 years, the proportion of men treated with definitive treatment for high-risk disease increased from 17.3% to 46.5% (29.3%; 95% CI, 21.9%-36.6%) from 2000 to 2019. Among men with an LE of less than 5 years who were receiving definitive therapy, the predominant treatment was radiotherapy (85%). Among men with an LE of less than 5 years, use of radiotherapy increased from 16.3% to 39.0% (22.6%; 95% CI, 16.5%-28.8%) from 2000 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The results of this cohort study suggest that, in the active surveillance era, overtreatment of men with limited LE and intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer has increased in the VA, mainly with radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14714,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5994","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Men with limited life expectancy (LE) have historically been overtreated for prostate cancer despite clear guideline recommendations. With increasing use of active surveillance, it is unclear if overtreatment of men with limited LE has persisted and how overtreatment varies by tumor risk and treatment type.

Objective: To determine if rates of overtreatment of men with limited LE have persisted in the active surveillance era and whether overtreatment varies by tumor risk or treatment type.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study included men with clinically localized prostate cancer in the Veterans Affairs health system who received a diagnosis between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019.

Main outcomes and measures: LE was estimated using the validated age-adjusted Prostate Cancer Comorbidity Index (PCCI). Treatment trends among men with limited LE were assessed using a stratified linear and log-linear Poisson regression in aggregate and across PCCI and tumor risk subgroups.

Results: The mean (SD) age for the study population of 243 928 men was 66.8 (8.0) years. A total of 50 045 (20.5%) and 11 366 (4.7%) men had an LE of less than 10 years and LE of less than 5 years based on PCCI scores of 5 or greater and 10 or greater, respectively. Among men with an LE of less than 10 years, the proportion of men treated with definitive treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) for low-risk disease decreased from 37.4% to 14.7% (absolute change, -22.7%; 95% CI, -30.0% to -15.4%) but increased for intermediate-risk disease from 37.6% to 59.8% (22.1%; 95% CI, 14.8%-29.4%) from 2000 to 2019, with increases observed for favorable (32.8%-57.8%) unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (46.1%-65.2%). Among men with an LE of less than 10 years who were receiving definitive therapy, the predominant treatment was radiotherapy (78%). Among men with an LE of less than 10 years, use of radiotherapy increased from 31.3% to 44.9% (13.6%; 95% CI, 8.5%-18.7%) for intermediate-risk disease from 2000 to 2019, with increases observed for favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease. Among men with an LE of less than 5 years, the proportion of men treated with definitive treatment for high-risk disease increased from 17.3% to 46.5% (29.3%; 95% CI, 21.9%-36.6%) from 2000 to 2019. Among men with an LE of less than 5 years who were receiving definitive therapy, the predominant treatment was radiotherapy (85%). Among men with an LE of less than 5 years, use of radiotherapy increased from 16.3% to 39.0% (22.6%; 95% CI, 16.5%-28.8%) from 2000 to 2019.

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that, in the active surveillance era, overtreatment of men with limited LE and intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer has increased in the VA, mainly with radiotherapy.

在主动监测时代,寿命有限的男性过度治疗前列腺癌。
重要性:尽管有明确的指南建议,但预期寿命有限(LE)的男性一直以来都过度治疗前列腺癌。随着主动监测的使用越来越多,目前尚不清楚对有限预期寿命男性的过度治疗是否仍然存在,以及过度治疗在肿瘤风险和治疗类型上有何不同:目的:确定在主动监测时代,对局限性 LE 男性患者的过度治疗率是否持续存在,以及过度治疗是否因肿瘤风险或治疗类型而异:这项队列研究包括退伍军人事务医疗系统中2000年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间确诊的临床局部前列腺癌男性患者:使用经过验证的年龄调整后的前列腺癌合并症指数(PCCI)估算LE。采用分层线性回归和对数线性泊松回归对有限LE男性的治疗趋势进行评估,并对PCCI和肿瘤风险亚组进行评估:243 928 名男性研究对象的平均(标清)年龄为 66.8(8.0)岁。根据 PCCI 评分 5 分或以上和 10 分或以上,分别有 50 045 名(20.5%)和 11 366 名(4.7%)男性的平均寿命不足 10 年和不足 5 年。在LE不足10年的男性中,2000年至2019年期间,低危疾病接受明确治疗(手术或放疗)的男性比例从37.4%降至14.7%(绝对变化,-22.7%;95% CI,-30.0%至-15.4%),但中危疾病的治疗比例从37.6%增至59.8%(22.1%;95% CI,14.8%至29.4%),观察到有利中危疾病(32.8%至57.8%)和不利中危疾病(46.1%至65.2%)的治疗比例均有所上升。在接受明确治疗的 LE 不足 10 年的男性中,最主要的治疗方法是放疗(78%)。从2000年到2019年,在LE不足10年的男性中,中危疾病的放疗使用率从31.3%增至44.9%(13.6%;95% CI,8.5%-18.7%),观察到有利和不利中危疾病的放疗使用率均有所上升。在 LE 不足 5 年的男性中,接受高风险疾病明确治疗的男性比例从 2000 年的 17.3% 增加到 2019 年的 46.5%(29.3%;95% CI,21.9%-36.6%)。在接受明确治疗的 LE 不足 5 年的男性中,最主要的治疗方法是放射治疗(85%)。在LE不足5年的男性中,放疗的使用率从2000年的16.3%增至2019年的39.0%(22.6%;95% CI,16.5%-28.8%):这项队列研究的结果表明,在主动监测时代,美国退伍军人事务部对有限LE、中危和高危前列腺癌男性的过度治疗有所增加,主要是放疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Internal Medicine
JAMA Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
43.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: JAMA Internal Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal committed to advancing the field of internal medicine worldwide. With a focus on four core priorities—clinical relevance, clinical practice change, credibility, and effective communication—the journal aims to provide indispensable and trustworthy peer-reviewed evidence. Catering to academics, clinicians, educators, researchers, and trainees across the entire spectrum of internal medicine, including general internal medicine and subspecialties, JAMA Internal Medicine publishes innovative and clinically relevant research. The journal strives to deliver stimulating articles that educate and inform readers with the latest research findings, driving positive change in healthcare systems and patient care delivery. As a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed medical publications, JAMA Internal Medicine plays a pivotal role in shaping the discourse and advancing patient care in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信