Identification of a 5-Plex Cytokine Signature that Differentiates Patients with Multiple Systemic Inflammatory Diseases.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Levi Hoste, Bram Meertens, Benson Ogunjimi, Vito Sabato, Khadija Guerti, Jeroen van der Hilst, Jeroen Bogie, Rik Joos, Karlien Claes, Veronique Debacker, Fleur Janssen, Simon J Tavernier, Peggy Jacques, Steven Callens, Joke Dehoorne, Filomeen Haerynck
{"title":"Identification of a 5-Plex Cytokine Signature that Differentiates Patients with Multiple Systemic Inflammatory Diseases.","authors":"Levi Hoste, Bram Meertens, Benson Ogunjimi, Vito Sabato, Khadija Guerti, Jeroen van der Hilst, Jeroen Bogie, Rik Joos, Karlien Claes, Veronique Debacker, Fleur Janssen, Simon J Tavernier, Peggy Jacques, Steven Callens, Joke Dehoorne, Filomeen Haerynck","doi":"10.1007/s10753-024-02183-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with non-infectious systemic inflammation may suffer from one of many diseases, including hyperinflammation (HI), autoinflammatory disorders (AID), and systemic autoimmune disease (AI). Despite their clinical overlap, the pathophysiology and patient management differ between these disorders. We aimed to investigate blood biomarkers able to discriminate between patient groups. We included 44 patients with active clinical and/or genetic systemic inflammatory disease (9 HI, 27 AID, 8 systemic AI) and 16 healthy controls. We quantified 55 serum proteins and combined multiple machine learning algorithms to identify five proteins (CCL26, CXCL10, ICAM-1, IL-27, and SAA) that maximally separated patient groups. High ICAM-1 was associated with HI. AID was characterized by an increase in SAA and decrease in CXCL10 levels. A trend for higher CXCL10 and statistically lower SAA was observed in patients with systemic AI. Principal component analysis and unsupervised hierarchical clustering confirmed separation of disease groups. Logistic regression modelling revealed a high statistical significance for HI (P = 0.001), AID, and systemic AI (P < 0.0001). Predictive accuracy was excellent for systemic AI (AUC 0.94) and AID (0.91) and good for HI (0.81). Further research is needed to validate findings in a larger prospective cohort. Results will contribute to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of systemic inflammatory disorders and can improve diagnosis and patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":13524,"journal":{"name":"Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-024-02183-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with non-infectious systemic inflammation may suffer from one of many diseases, including hyperinflammation (HI), autoinflammatory disorders (AID), and systemic autoimmune disease (AI). Despite their clinical overlap, the pathophysiology and patient management differ between these disorders. We aimed to investigate blood biomarkers able to discriminate between patient groups. We included 44 patients with active clinical and/or genetic systemic inflammatory disease (9 HI, 27 AID, 8 systemic AI) and 16 healthy controls. We quantified 55 serum proteins and combined multiple machine learning algorithms to identify five proteins (CCL26, CXCL10, ICAM-1, IL-27, and SAA) that maximally separated patient groups. High ICAM-1 was associated with HI. AID was characterized by an increase in SAA and decrease in CXCL10 levels. A trend for higher CXCL10 and statistically lower SAA was observed in patients with systemic AI. Principal component analysis and unsupervised hierarchical clustering confirmed separation of disease groups. Logistic regression modelling revealed a high statistical significance for HI (P = 0.001), AID, and systemic AI (P < 0.0001). Predictive accuracy was excellent for systemic AI (AUC 0.94) and AID (0.91) and good for HI (0.81). Further research is needed to validate findings in a larger prospective cohort. Results will contribute to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of systemic inflammatory disorders and can improve diagnosis and patient management.

鉴定可区分多种系统性炎症疾病患者的 5 重细胞因子特征。
非感染性全身炎症患者可能患有多种疾病之一,包括高炎症(HI)、自身炎症性疾病(AID)和全身自身免疫性疾病(AI)。尽管这些疾病在临床上有所重叠,但其病理生理学和患者管理却各不相同。我们的目的是研究能够区分不同患者群体的血液生物标志物。我们纳入了 44 名患有活动性临床和/或遗传性系统性炎症疾病的患者(9 名 HI、27 名 AID、8 名系统性 AI)和 16 名健康对照者。我们对 55 种血清蛋白进行了定量分析,并结合多种机器学习算法确定了能最大程度区分患者群体的五种蛋白(CCL26、CXCL10、ICAM-1、IL-27 和 SAA)。高 ICAM-1 与 HI 相关。AID的特点是SAA水平升高,CXCL10水平降低。全身性 AI 患者的 CXCL10 水平呈上升趋势,而 SAA 水平在统计学上呈下降趋势。主成分分析和无监督分层聚类证实了疾病分组的分离。逻辑回归模型显示,HI(P = 0.001)、AID 和全身性 AI(P = 0.001)具有高度统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Inflammation
Inflammation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
168
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Inflammation publishes the latest international advances in experimental and clinical research on the physiology, biochemistry, cell biology, and pharmacology of inflammation. Contributions include full-length scientific reports, short definitive articles, and papers from meetings and symposia proceedings. The journal''s coverage includes acute and chronic inflammation; mediators of inflammation; mechanisms of tissue injury and cytotoxicity; pharmacology of inflammation; and clinical studies of inflammation and its modification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信