Determinants of Doctor-Patient Communication in Terms of Patient Rights During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kamila Jaroń, Mateusz Grajek, Joanna Kobza
{"title":"Determinants of Doctor-Patient Communication in Terms of Patient Rights During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Kamila Jaroń, Mateusz Grajek, Joanna Kobza","doi":"10.3390/healthcare12212198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Today, the public does not want to be just a passive consumer of health services. Patients often expect to be informed and involved in decisions about their health. With better doctor-patient communication, patients are more likely to follow treatment recommendations.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study was conducted using a face-to-face survey method on a group of 203 adult, independent patients from 2021 to 2022 at a medical facility, i.e., a rehabilitation clinic.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the determinants of doctor-patient communication in terms of patient rights. One of patients' rights is the right to information about their health condition and treatment methods and the right to ask questions when the doctor does not provide details about the treatment or diagnosis or when it is not understandable. Doctors providing information to the patient and the opportunity for the patient to ask questions are key elements in the process of making informed decisions regarding further medical treatment. Therefore, patients were divided into two groups: active (+) and passive in communication (-) with doctors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who were active in communication (33%) wanted to ask questions or had the opportunity to ask the doctor questions, and thus, they were able to take an active part in the discussion with the doctor. In contrast, patients who were passive in communication (67%) did not want to ask questions or did not have the opportunity to ask the doctor questions, and therefore, their active participation in the discussion and thus their right to ask questions may have been limited. The authors' survey shows that respondents with active communication were significantly more likely than patients with passive communication (almost 100% vs. 86%) to obtain information about their condition (<i>p</i> = 0.002), diagnostic methods (<i>p</i> = 0.003), therapeutic methods (<i>p</i> = 0.00007), treatment results, and prognosis (<i>p</i> = 0.0008). Moreover, almost all respondents with active communication as opposed to respondents with passive communication (95% vs. 52%) rated communication with doctors highest (on a scale from 0 to 5), including credible and professional approach to patients (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), providing information in clear and simple language (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), answering questions asked by patients (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), openness and kindness (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), maintaining professional confidentiality (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), or emotional support (<i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hence, the primary key element of the medical consultation is appropriate amount and content of information given to the patient, providing explanations and answering questions. Also importantly, according to the results, active communication between patients and doctors was significantly influenced by female gender, higher education, and a positive evaluation of communication with doctors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Today, the public does not want to be just a passive consumer of health services. Patients often expect to be informed and involved in decisions about their health. With better doctor-patient communication, patients are more likely to follow treatment recommendations.

Material and methods: The study was conducted using a face-to-face survey method on a group of 203 adult, independent patients from 2021 to 2022 at a medical facility, i.e., a rehabilitation clinic.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the determinants of doctor-patient communication in terms of patient rights. One of patients' rights is the right to information about their health condition and treatment methods and the right to ask questions when the doctor does not provide details about the treatment or diagnosis or when it is not understandable. Doctors providing information to the patient and the opportunity for the patient to ask questions are key elements in the process of making informed decisions regarding further medical treatment. Therefore, patients were divided into two groups: active (+) and passive in communication (-) with doctors.

Results: Patients who were active in communication (33%) wanted to ask questions or had the opportunity to ask the doctor questions, and thus, they were able to take an active part in the discussion with the doctor. In contrast, patients who were passive in communication (67%) did not want to ask questions or did not have the opportunity to ask the doctor questions, and therefore, their active participation in the discussion and thus their right to ask questions may have been limited. The authors' survey shows that respondents with active communication were significantly more likely than patients with passive communication (almost 100% vs. 86%) to obtain information about their condition (p = 0.002), diagnostic methods (p = 0.003), therapeutic methods (p = 0.00007), treatment results, and prognosis (p = 0.0008). Moreover, almost all respondents with active communication as opposed to respondents with passive communication (95% vs. 52%) rated communication with doctors highest (on a scale from 0 to 5), including credible and professional approach to patients (p < 0.0001), providing information in clear and simple language (p < 0.0001), answering questions asked by patients (p < 0.0001), openness and kindness (p < 0.0001), maintaining professional confidentiality (p < 0.0001), or emotional support (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Hence, the primary key element of the medical consultation is appropriate amount and content of information given to the patient, providing explanations and answering questions. Also importantly, according to the results, active communication between patients and doctors was significantly influenced by female gender, higher education, and a positive evaluation of communication with doctors.

在 COVID-19 大流行期间医患沟通在患者权利方面的决定因素。
背景:如今,公众不想只是被动地消费医疗服务。患者通常希望了解相关信息,并参与有关其健康的决策。加强医患沟通,患者更有可能遵从治疗建议:本研究采用面对面调查的方法,从 2021 年至 2022 年在一家医疗机构(即一家康复诊所)对 203 名独立的成年患者进行了调查:本研究旨在从患者权利的角度评估医患沟通的决定因素。患者的权利之一是有权获得有关其健康状况和治疗方法的信息,并有权在医生未提供有关治疗或诊断的详细信息或无法理解时提出问题。医生向病人提供信息和病人提问的机会,是病人在知情的情况下做出进一步治疗决定的关键因素。因此,患者被分为两组:主动(+)和被动(-)与医生沟通:积极与医生沟通的患者(33%)希望提问或有机会向医生提问,因此,他们能够积极参与与医生的讨论。相比之下,被动沟通的患者(67%)不想提问或没有机会向医生提问,因此,他们积极参与讨论的权利可能受到了限制。作者的调查显示,与被动交流的患者相比,主动交流的受访者(几乎 100% 对 86%)明显更容易获得有关病情(p = 0.002)、诊断方法(p = 0.003)、治疗方法(p = 0.00007)、治疗结果和预后(p = 0.0008)的信息。此外,与被动沟通的受访者相比,几乎所有主动沟通的受访者(95% 对 52%)都对与医生的沟通给予了最高评价(从 0 到 5 分),包括对患者的可信和专业态度(p < 0.0001)、用简单明了的语言提供信息(p < 0.0001)、回答患者提出的问题(p < 0.0001)、坦诚和亲切(p < 0.0001)、保持专业保密(p < 0.0001)或情感支持(p < 0.0001):因此,医疗咨询的首要关键因素是向患者提供适当数量和内容的信息,提供解释并回答问题。同样重要的是,研究结果表明,患者与医生之间的积极沟通在很大程度上受到女性性别、高等教育程度以及对与医生沟通的积极评价的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信