{"title":"Deciphering the Physical Characteristics of Ophthalmic Filters Used in Optometric Vision Therapy.","authors":"Danjela Ibrahimi, Marcos Aviles, Guillermo Valencia Luna, Juvenal Rodriguez Resendiz","doi":"10.3390/healthcare12212177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper aimed to measure and characterize eleven monochromatic filters and twenty-two combinations used empirically to treat patients with visual dysfunctions to propose enhanced protocols based on solid evidence. Their wavelength, transmittance, and relative sensitivity were defined on the retinal cone cells.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-beam UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer, VARIAN brand, Cary 5000 model, owned by the National Center of Metrology, with high precision and accuracy, was used to characterize all filters. Filters were purchased from Optomatters Corporation, Belgium.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When two or three filters are combined, their transmittance and relative sensitivity on the retinal cone cells decrease regardless of wavelength. As a result, the efficiency of combined filters may decrease during treatments. Additionally, most filters and combinations, regardless of the wavelength, transmit a considerable percentage of light from the red spectrum. A depressant is the best monochromatic filter, and Upsilon-Neurasthenic is the strongest combination to stimulate blue cone cells. In contrast, Stimulant and Delta-Theta are best for red and green cone cells. Mu-Delta and Mu-Theta can be interchangeable, as well as Alpha-Delta and Alpha-Theta.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that the current phototherapy treatment protocol must be deeply revised, and the number of filters and combinations should be reduced to reduce costs and time and boost efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"12 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This paper aimed to measure and characterize eleven monochromatic filters and twenty-two combinations used empirically to treat patients with visual dysfunctions to propose enhanced protocols based on solid evidence. Their wavelength, transmittance, and relative sensitivity were defined on the retinal cone cells.
Methods: A double-beam UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer, VARIAN brand, Cary 5000 model, owned by the National Center of Metrology, with high precision and accuracy, was used to characterize all filters. Filters were purchased from Optomatters Corporation, Belgium.
Results: When two or three filters are combined, their transmittance and relative sensitivity on the retinal cone cells decrease regardless of wavelength. As a result, the efficiency of combined filters may decrease during treatments. Additionally, most filters and combinations, regardless of the wavelength, transmit a considerable percentage of light from the red spectrum. A depressant is the best monochromatic filter, and Upsilon-Neurasthenic is the strongest combination to stimulate blue cone cells. In contrast, Stimulant and Delta-Theta are best for red and green cone cells. Mu-Delta and Mu-Theta can be interchangeable, as well as Alpha-Delta and Alpha-Theta.
Conclusions: Results suggest that the current phototherapy treatment protocol must be deeply revised, and the number of filters and combinations should be reduced to reduce costs and time and boost efficiency.
期刊介绍:
Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.