Opioid Use Following Spine Surgery in Ambulatory Surgical Centers Versus Hospital Outpatient Departments.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rodnell Busigó Torres, Husni Alasadi, Akiro H Duey, Junho Song, Jashvant Poeran, Brocha Z Stern, Saad B Chaudhary
{"title":"Opioid Use Following Spine Surgery in Ambulatory Surgical Centers Versus Hospital Outpatient Departments.","authors":"Rodnell Busigó Torres, Husni Alasadi, Akiro H Duey, Junho Song, Jashvant Poeran, Brocha Z Stern, Saad B Chaudhary","doi":"10.1177/21925682241301684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association between undergoing spine surgery in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC) vs a hospital outpatient department (HOPD) and (a) perioperative opioid prescription patterns and (b) prolonged opioid use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Merative MarketScan Database included patients aged 18-64 who underwent single-level or multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or lumbar decompression between January 2017 and June 2021. Primary outcomes included receipt of a perioperative opioid prescription, perioperative oral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), and prolonged opioid use (defined as opioid prescription 91-180 days post-surgery). Secondary outcomes included the number of perioperative opioid prescriptions filled (single/multiple) and type of initial perioperative opioid filled (potent/weak). Analysis of prolonged opioid use was limited to opioid-naive patients. Propensity score matching (1 ASC to 3 HOPD cases) and logistic regression models were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 11,654 ACDF and 26,486 lumbar decompression patients. For ACDF, ASCs had higher odds of an initial potent opioid prescription (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.08-1.30, <i>P</i> < .001) and higher total adjusted mean MMEs (+21.14, 95% CI 3.08-39.20, <i>P</i> = .02). For lumbar decompression, ASCs had increased odds of an initial potent opioid (OR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.16-1.30, <i>P</i> < .001) but lower odds of multiple opioid prescriptions (OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.96, <i>P</i> < .001). There was no significant association between the surgery setting and prolonged opioid use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differences in perioperative opioid prescribing were observed between ASCs and HOPDs, but there was no increase in prolonged opioid use in ASCs. Further research is needed to optimize postoperative pain management in different outpatient settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682241301684"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241301684","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To assess the association between undergoing spine surgery in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC) vs a hospital outpatient department (HOPD) and (a) perioperative opioid prescription patterns and (b) prolonged opioid use.

Methods: Data from the Merative MarketScan Database included patients aged 18-64 who underwent single-level or multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or lumbar decompression between January 2017 and June 2021. Primary outcomes included receipt of a perioperative opioid prescription, perioperative oral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), and prolonged opioid use (defined as opioid prescription 91-180 days post-surgery). Secondary outcomes included the number of perioperative opioid prescriptions filled (single/multiple) and type of initial perioperative opioid filled (potent/weak). Analysis of prolonged opioid use was limited to opioid-naive patients. Propensity score matching (1 ASC to 3 HOPD cases) and logistic regression models were used for analysis.

Results: The study included 11,654 ACDF and 26,486 lumbar decompression patients. For ACDF, ASCs had higher odds of an initial potent opioid prescription (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.08-1.30, P < .001) and higher total adjusted mean MMEs (+21.14, 95% CI 3.08-39.20, P = .02). For lumbar decompression, ASCs had increased odds of an initial potent opioid (OR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.16-1.30, P < .001) but lower odds of multiple opioid prescriptions (OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.96, P < .001). There was no significant association between the surgery setting and prolonged opioid use.

Conclusion: Differences in perioperative opioid prescribing were observed between ASCs and HOPDs, but there was no increase in prolonged opioid use in ASCs. Further research is needed to optimize postoperative pain management in different outpatient settings.

非住院手术中心与医院门诊部脊柱手术后阿片类药物的使用情况。
研究设计回顾性队列研究:评估在非卧床手术中心(ASC)和医院门诊部(HOPD)接受脊柱手术与(a)围手术期阿片类药物处方模式和(b)阿片类药物长期使用之间的关联:来自 Merative MarketScan 数据库的数据包括在 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间接受单层或多层前路颈椎椎间盘切除和融合术 (ACDF) 或腰椎减压术的 18-64 岁患者。主要结果包括收到围手术期阿片类药物处方、围手术期口服吗啡毫克当量(MMEs)和长期使用阿片类药物(定义为手术后 91-180 天的阿片类药物处方)。次要结果包括围手术期阿片类药物处方数量(单次/多次)和首次围手术期阿片类药物处方类型(强效/弱效)。对长期使用阿片类药物的分析仅限于未使用阿片类药物的患者。分析采用倾向评分匹配(1 例 ASC 对 3 例 HOPD)和逻辑回归模型:研究纳入了11654例ACDF和26486例腰椎减压患者。对于 ACDF,ASC 首次开具强效阿片类药物处方的几率更高(OR = 1.18,95% CI 1.08-1.30,P < .001),调整后的平均 MMEs 总值更高(+21.14,95% CI 3.08-39.20,P = .02)。在腰椎减压术中,ASC 首次使用强效阿片类药物的几率增加(OR = 1.23,95% CI 1.16-1.30,P < .001),但多次使用阿片类药物处方的几率降低(OR = 0.90,95% CI 0.85-0.96,P < .001)。手术环境与长期使用阿片类药物之间没有明显关联:结论:在ASC和HOPD之间观察到了围手术期阿片类药物处方的差异,但ASC中阿片类药物的长期使用并没有增加。需要进一步开展研究,以优化不同门诊环境下的术后疼痛管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信