Advance care planning in patients with respiratory failure.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2024-11-13 Print Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0120-2024
Carla Ribeiro, Paula Pamplona, Anita K Simonds
{"title":"Advance care planning in patients with respiratory failure.","authors":"Carla Ribeiro, Paula Pamplona, Anita K Simonds","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0120-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advance care planning (ACP) is a complex and iterative communication process between patients, surrogates and clinicians that defines goals of care that may include, but is not limited to, documentation of advance directives. The aim of ACP is to promote patient-centred care tailored to the patient's clinical situation through informed preparation for the future and improved communication between patient, clinicians and surrogates, if the latter need to make decisions on patient's behalf.The aim of this article is to review research related to ACP in acute and chronic respiratory failure, regarding the process, communication, shared decision-making, implementation and outcomes.Research has produced controversial results on ACP interventions due to the heterogeneity of measures and outcomes, but positive outcomes have been described regarding the quality of patient-physician communication, preference for comfort care, decisional conflict and patient-caregiver congruence of preferences and improved documentation of ACP or advance directives.The main barriers to ACP in chronic respiratory failure are the uncertainty of prognosis (particularly in the organ failure trajectory), the choice of the best timing for initiation and the lack of training of healthcare workers. In acute respiratory failure, the ACP process can be very short, should include the patient whenever possible, and is based on a discussion of treatments appropriate to the patient's functional status prior to the event (<i>e.g.</i> assessment of frailty) and clear communication of the likely consequences of possible options.All healthcare worker dealing with patients with serious illnesses should have training in communication skills to promote engagement in ACP discussions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 174","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0120-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advance care planning (ACP) is a complex and iterative communication process between patients, surrogates and clinicians that defines goals of care that may include, but is not limited to, documentation of advance directives. The aim of ACP is to promote patient-centred care tailored to the patient's clinical situation through informed preparation for the future and improved communication between patient, clinicians and surrogates, if the latter need to make decisions on patient's behalf.The aim of this article is to review research related to ACP in acute and chronic respiratory failure, regarding the process, communication, shared decision-making, implementation and outcomes.Research has produced controversial results on ACP interventions due to the heterogeneity of measures and outcomes, but positive outcomes have been described regarding the quality of patient-physician communication, preference for comfort care, decisional conflict and patient-caregiver congruence of preferences and improved documentation of ACP or advance directives.The main barriers to ACP in chronic respiratory failure are the uncertainty of prognosis (particularly in the organ failure trajectory), the choice of the best timing for initiation and the lack of training of healthcare workers. In acute respiratory failure, the ACP process can be very short, should include the patient whenever possible, and is based on a discussion of treatments appropriate to the patient's functional status prior to the event (e.g. assessment of frailty) and clear communication of the likely consequences of possible options.All healthcare worker dealing with patients with serious illnesses should have training in communication skills to promote engagement in ACP discussions.

呼吸衰竭患者的预先护理计划。
预先护理计划(ACP)是患者、代理人和临床医生之间复杂而反复的沟通过程,它确定了护理目标,可能包括但不限于预先指令的记录。ACP 的目的是通过对未来的知情准备以及改善患者、临床医生和代理(如果后者需要代表患者做出决定)之间的沟通,促进以患者为中心、根据患者临床情况量身定制的护理。本文旨在回顾与急性和慢性呼吸衰竭 ACP 相关的研究,内容涉及过程、沟通、共同决策、实施和结果。由于衡量标准和结果的异质性,ACP 干预的研究结果存在争议,但在医患沟通质量、舒适护理偏好、决策冲突和患者-护理人员偏好一致性以及改进 ACP 或预嘱记录等方面取得了积极成果。ACP 在慢性呼吸衰竭中的主要障碍是预后的不确定性(尤其是器官衰竭轨迹)、最佳启动时机的选择以及医护人员缺乏培训。在急性呼吸衰竭中,ACP 的过程可以很短,应尽可能将患者包括在内,并基于对适合患者事前功能状态的治疗方法的讨论(如评估虚弱程度)以及对可能的选择可能产生的后果的清晰沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信