Biopsy-based Basal-luminal Subtyping Classifier in High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Combined Analysis of the NRG Oncology/RTOG 9202, 9413, and 9902 Phase 3 Trials.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Krishnan R Patel, Paul L Nguyen, James A Proudfoot, Yang Liu, Alan Dal Pra, Daniel E Spratt, Alan Pollack, Howard M Sandler, Jason A Efstathiou, Colleen Lawton, Jeffry P Simko, Seth A Rosenthal, Kenneth L Zeitzer, Lucas C Mendez, Alan C Hartford, William A Hall, Anand B Desai, Stephanie L Pugh, Elai Davicioni, Phuoc T Tran, Felix Y Feng
{"title":"Biopsy-based Basal-luminal Subtyping Classifier in High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Combined Analysis of the NRG Oncology/RTOG 9202, 9413, and 9902 Phase 3 Trials.","authors":"Krishnan R Patel, Paul L Nguyen, James A Proudfoot, Yang Liu, Alan Dal Pra, Daniel E Spratt, Alan Pollack, Howard M Sandler, Jason A Efstathiou, Colleen Lawton, Jeffry P Simko, Seth A Rosenthal, Kenneth L Zeitzer, Lucas C Mendez, Alan C Hartford, William A Hall, Anand B Desai, Stephanie L Pugh, Elai Davicioni, Phuoc T Tran, Felix Y Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.10.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Long-term (LT) androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been found to be beneficial to patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). However, administration of LT-ADT to all patients with high-risk PCa may lead to overtreatment. Enhanced risk stratification using genomic classifiers (such as the recently developed prostate subtyping classifier [PSC]) might be useful. This study aims to characterize the prognostic and predictive ability of the PSC in patients with high-risk PCa undergoing radiotherapy long-term (LT; 24-28 mo) versus short-term (ST; 4 mo) ADT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Biopsy samples from three randomized, phase 3 trials-NRG/RTOG 9202, 9413, and 9902-were classified as either PSC basal or luminal. The prognostic and predictive values of PSC for each oncologic endpoint (biochemical failure [BF], distant metastasis [DM], metastasis-free survival [MFS], PCa-specific mortality [PCSM], overall survival [OS]) and other cause-mortality (OCM) were assessed with Cox proportional hazards (MFS, OCM, and OS), Fine-Gray (BF, DM, and PCSM), and restricted mean survival time (RMST) models.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>On a multivariable analysis, the basal subtype was found to have a worse prognosis for MFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8 [1.3-2.5], p < 0.001), PCSM (subdistribution HR 2.4 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.4-4.1], p = 0.001), and OS (HR 1.8 [1.3-2.6], p < 0.001). Ten-year PCSM was 15% better for the luminal subtype than for the basal subtype (11% [95% CI 6-15%] vs 26% [95% CI 17-35%]). A significant interaction between ADT duration (LT vs ST) and PSC subtype (basal vs luminal) was observed for PCSM (p<sub>interaction</sub> = 0.008), leading to the observation that 10-yr PCSM was improved with LT-ADT only in patients with basal-type tumors (5% [95% CI 0-11%] vs 42% [29-56%], p < 0.001). Improvements in 10-yr RMST with LT-ADT were greater for basal tumors for oncologic endpoints with the exception of OCM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>PSC is both a prognostic and a predictive biomarker for patients who benefit from LT-ADT. PSC subtypes may be used to personalize ADT recommendations for patients with high-risk PCa, pending further validation in a prospective study.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this study, we tried to understand the usefulness of a new genomic test in patients with high-risk, nonmetastatic prostate cancer who underwent radiation therapy and hormonal therapy (HT). We found that this test can help determine a patient's prognosis (eg, a patient's chance of having the cancer return) and, more importantly, personalize treatment decisions by understanding which patients may benefit from long-term HT. This has the potential to save many patients who may not benefit from prolonged HT from \"overtreatment\" or the unnecessary side effects of such treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.10.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Long-term (LT) androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been found to be beneficial to patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). However, administration of LT-ADT to all patients with high-risk PCa may lead to overtreatment. Enhanced risk stratification using genomic classifiers (such as the recently developed prostate subtyping classifier [PSC]) might be useful. This study aims to characterize the prognostic and predictive ability of the PSC in patients with high-risk PCa undergoing radiotherapy long-term (LT; 24-28 mo) versus short-term (ST; 4 mo) ADT.

Methods: Biopsy samples from three randomized, phase 3 trials-NRG/RTOG 9202, 9413, and 9902-were classified as either PSC basal or luminal. The prognostic and predictive values of PSC for each oncologic endpoint (biochemical failure [BF], distant metastasis [DM], metastasis-free survival [MFS], PCa-specific mortality [PCSM], overall survival [OS]) and other cause-mortality (OCM) were assessed with Cox proportional hazards (MFS, OCM, and OS), Fine-Gray (BF, DM, and PCSM), and restricted mean survival time (RMST) models.

Key findings and limitations: On a multivariable analysis, the basal subtype was found to have a worse prognosis for MFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8 [1.3-2.5], p < 0.001), PCSM (subdistribution HR 2.4 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.4-4.1], p = 0.001), and OS (HR 1.8 [1.3-2.6], p < 0.001). Ten-year PCSM was 15% better for the luminal subtype than for the basal subtype (11% [95% CI 6-15%] vs 26% [95% CI 17-35%]). A significant interaction between ADT duration (LT vs ST) and PSC subtype (basal vs luminal) was observed for PCSM (pinteraction = 0.008), leading to the observation that 10-yr PCSM was improved with LT-ADT only in patients with basal-type tumors (5% [95% CI 0-11%] vs 42% [29-56%], p < 0.001). Improvements in 10-yr RMST with LT-ADT were greater for basal tumors for oncologic endpoints with the exception of OCM.

Conclusions and clinical implications: PSC is both a prognostic and a predictive biomarker for patients who benefit from LT-ADT. PSC subtypes may be used to personalize ADT recommendations for patients with high-risk PCa, pending further validation in a prospective study.

Patient summary: In this study, we tried to understand the usefulness of a new genomic test in patients with high-risk, nonmetastatic prostate cancer who underwent radiation therapy and hormonal therapy (HT). We found that this test can help determine a patient's prognosis (eg, a patient's chance of having the cancer return) and, more importantly, personalize treatment decisions by understanding which patients may benefit from long-term HT. This has the potential to save many patients who may not benefit from prolonged HT from "overtreatment" or the unnecessary side effects of such treatment.

基于活检的高危前列腺癌基底腔亚型分类器:NRG Oncology/RTOG 9202、9413 和 9902 3 期试验的综合分析。
背景和目的:研究发现,长期(LT)雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)对高危前列腺癌(PCa)患者有益。然而,对所有高危 PCa 患者实施 LT-ADT 可能会导致过度治疗。利用基因组分类器(如最近开发的前列腺亚型分类器 [PSC])加强风险分层可能会有所帮助。本研究旨在描述PSC在长期(LT;24-28个月)与短期(ST;4个月)ADT放疗的高危PCa患者中的预后和预测能力:来自三项随机三期试验--NRG/RTOG 9202、9413 和 9902 的活检样本被分为基底型 PSC 和管腔型 PSC。采用 Cox 比例危险度模型(MFS、OCM 和 OS)、Fine-Gray 模型(BF、DM 和 PCSM)和受限平均生存时间模型(RMST)评估了 PSC 对各肿瘤终点(生化失败 [BF]、远处转移 [DM]、无转移生存期 [MFS]、PCa 特异性死亡率 [PCSM]、总生存期 [OS])和其他原因死亡率 (OCM) 的预后和预测价值:在一项多变量分析中发现,基底亚型患者的 MFS 预后较差(危险比 [HR] 1.8 [1.3-2.5],P 交互作用 = 0.008),从而观察到只有基底型肿瘤患者的 10 年 PCSM 可通过 LT-ADT 得到改善(5% [95% CI 0-11%] vs 42% [29-56%],P 结论和临床意义:PSC既是LT-ADT获益患者的预后生物标志物,也是预测性生物标志物。PSC亚型可用于为高危PCa患者提供个性化的ADT建议,但还有待于前瞻性研究的进一步验证。患者总结:在这项研究中,我们试图了解一种新的基因组检验对接受放疗和激素治疗(HT)的高危、非转移性前列腺癌患者的作用。我们发现,这种检测有助于确定患者的预后(例如,患者癌症复发的几率),更重要的是,通过了解哪些患者可能从长期激素治疗中获益,从而做出个性化的治疗决定。这有可能使许多可能无法从长期高温治疗中获益的患者免于 "过度治疗 "或这种治疗不必要的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信