Is Pulse Modulation the Future of Laser Technology in Endourology: Evidence from a Literature Review - Section of EAU Endourology.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Christian Corsini, Daniele Robesti, Luca Villa, Francesco Montorsi, Amelia Pietropaolo, Frederic Panthier, Alba Sierra, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Jia-Lun Kwok, Arman Tsaturyan, Pablo Contreras, Nicola Fossati, Andrea Gallina, Etienne Xavier Keller, Thomas Knoll, Ioannis Kartalas Goumas, Bhaskar K Somani, Olivier Traxer, Andrea Salonia, Eugenio Ventimiglia
{"title":"Is Pulse Modulation the Future of Laser Technology in Endourology: Evidence from a Literature Review - Section of EAU Endourology.","authors":"Christian Corsini, Daniele Robesti, Luca Villa, Francesco Montorsi, Amelia Pietropaolo, Frederic Panthier, Alba Sierra, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Jia-Lun Kwok, Arman Tsaturyan, Pablo Contreras, Nicola Fossati, Andrea Gallina, Etienne Xavier Keller, Thomas Knoll, Ioannis Kartalas Goumas, Bhaskar K Somani, Olivier Traxer, Andrea Salonia, Eugenio Ventimiglia","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The aim of our review was to comprehensively evaluate the impact of pulse modulation technology in the field of endourology, with a focus on laser lithotripsy and prostate enucleation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases for articles published during the past 20 yr (January 2004-July 2024). Article selection adhered to the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. In vivo, ex vivo, in vitro, and clinical studies that reported on the impact of pulse modulation technologies in laser lithotripsy or prostate enucleation in comparison to a standard references or as a standalone report, with a focus on stone ablation efficiency, safety, tissue ablation, and hemostasis, were eligible. A total of 29 articles were included.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Pulse modulation is a feature mostly implemented for Ho:YAG laser generators. Preclinical studies on pulse modulation have demonstrated promising results for both stone fragmentation and laser-tissue interaction. Clinical studies that investigated technologies such as the Vapor Tunnel, Virtual Basket, and Moses have revealed better efficiency in comparison to the short-pulse modality. While there have been modest improvements in hemostasis and operating time, there has been no obvious improvement in outcomes after prostate surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>While in vitro studies have shown that pulse modulation improves stone fragmentation, reduces retropulsion, and maintains thermal safety, clinical outcomes are more variable. For prostate enucleation, the benefits are less consistent. Pulse modulation may improve efficiency, primarily by reducing operating times, but key outcomes such as stone-free and complication rates remain comparable to those with standard modalities.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>Our review shows that pulse modulation technology improves the effectiveness and safety of laser treatments for kidney stones. However, the benefits of this technology for prostate surgery are still uncertain, highlighting the need for more research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.10.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: The aim of our review was to comprehensively evaluate the impact of pulse modulation technology in the field of endourology, with a focus on laser lithotripsy and prostate enucleation.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases for articles published during the past 20 yr (January 2004-July 2024). Article selection adhered to the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. In vivo, ex vivo, in vitro, and clinical studies that reported on the impact of pulse modulation technologies in laser lithotripsy or prostate enucleation in comparison to a standard references or as a standalone report, with a focus on stone ablation efficiency, safety, tissue ablation, and hemostasis, were eligible. A total of 29 articles were included.

Key findings: Pulse modulation is a feature mostly implemented for Ho:YAG laser generators. Preclinical studies on pulse modulation have demonstrated promising results for both stone fragmentation and laser-tissue interaction. Clinical studies that investigated technologies such as the Vapor Tunnel, Virtual Basket, and Moses have revealed better efficiency in comparison to the short-pulse modality. While there have been modest improvements in hemostasis and operating time, there has been no obvious improvement in outcomes after prostate surgery.

Conclusions and clinical implications: While in vitro studies have shown that pulse modulation improves stone fragmentation, reduces retropulsion, and maintains thermal safety, clinical outcomes are more variable. For prostate enucleation, the benefits are less consistent. Pulse modulation may improve efficiency, primarily by reducing operating times, but key outcomes such as stone-free and complication rates remain comparable to those with standard modalities.

Patient summary: Our review shows that pulse modulation technology improves the effectiveness and safety of laser treatments for kidney stones. However, the benefits of this technology for prostate surgery are still uncertain, highlighting the need for more research.

脉冲调制是激光技术在腔内泌尿外科应用的未来吗?文献综述的证据 - EAU Endourology 分会。
背景和目的:我们的综述旨在全面评估脉冲调制技术在腔内泌尿学领域的影响,重点是激光碎石和前列腺去核术:在 PubMed、MEDLINE 和 Scopus 数据库中对过去 20 年(2004 年 1 月至 2024 年 7 月)发表的文章进行了系统检索。文章的选择遵循了 "人群、干预、比较者、结果"(PICO)框架和 "系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目"(PRISMA)声明。符合条件的研究包括体内、体外、体外和临床研究,这些研究报告了脉冲调制技术在激光碎石或前列腺去核术中与标准参考文献相比或作为独立报告的影响,重点关注结石消融效率、安全性、组织消融和止血。共纳入 29 篇文章:脉冲调制是Ho:YAG激光发生器的主要功能。有关脉冲调制的临床前研究显示,在碎石和激光与组织相互作用方面都取得了良好的效果。对 Vapor Tunnel、Virtual Basket 和 Moses 等技术进行的临床研究显示,与短脉冲模式相比,短脉冲模式的效率更高。虽然止血效果和手术时间略有改善,但前列腺手术后的效果并没有明显改善:结论和临床意义:体外研究表明,脉冲调制可提高结石破碎率、减少反推力并保持热安全性,但临床结果却不尽相同。对于前列腺摘除术而言,其优势则不那么一致。患者总结:我们的综述显示,脉冲调制技术提高了激光治疗肾结石的有效性和安全性。然而,这种技术对前列腺手术的益处仍不确定,因此需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信