ECG-based epileptic seizure prediction: Challenges of current data-driven models.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Open Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1002/epi4.13073
Sotirios Kalousios, Jens Müller, Hongliu Yang, Matthias Eberlein, Ortrud Uckermann, Gabriele Schackert, Witold H Polanski, Georg Leonhardt
{"title":"ECG-based epileptic seizure prediction: Challenges of current data-driven models.","authors":"Sotirios Kalousios, Jens Müller, Hongliu Yang, Matthias Eberlein, Ortrud Uckermann, Gabriele Schackert, Witold H Polanski, Georg Leonhardt","doi":"10.1002/epi4.13073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Up to a third of patients with epilepsy fail to achieve satisfactory seizure control. A reliable method of predicting seizures would alleviate psychological and physical impact. Dysregulation in heart rate variability (HRV) has been found to precede epileptic seizures and may serve as an extracerebral predictive biomarker. This study aims to identify the preictal HRV dynamics and unveil the factors impeding the clinical application of ECG-based seizure prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-nine adult patients (eight women; median age: 38, [IQR = 31, 56.5]) with 252 seizures were included. Each patient had more than three recorded epileptic seizures, each at least 2 hours apart. For each seizure, one hour of ECG prior to seizure onset was analyzed and 97 HRV features were extracted from overlapping three-minute windows with 10s stride. Two separate patient-specific experiments were performed using a support vector machine (SVM). Firstly, the separability of training data was examined in a non-causal trial. Secondly, the prediction was attempted in pseudo-prospective conditions. Finally, visualized HRV data, clinical metadata, and results were correlated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) for the non-causal experiment was 0.823 (±0.12), with 208 (82.5%) seizures achieving an improvement over chance (IoC) classification score (p < 0.05, Hanley & McNeil test). In pseudo-prospective classification, the ROC-AUC was 0.569 (±0.17), and 86 (49.4%) seizures were classified with IoC. Off-sample optimized SVMs failed to improve performance. Major limiting factors identified include non-stationarity, variable preictal duration and dynamics. The latter is expressed as both inter-seizure onset zone (SOZ) and intra-SOZ variability.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>The pseudo-prospective preictal classification achieving IoC in approximately half of tested seizures suggests the presence of genuine preictal HRV dynamics, but the overall performance does not warrant clinical application at present. The limiting factors identified are often overlooked in non-causal study designs. While current deterministic prediction methods prove inadequate, probabilistic approaches may offer a promising alternative.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Many patients with epilepsy suffer from uncontrollable seizures and would greatly benefit from a reliable seizure prediction method. Currently, no such system is available to meet this need. Previous studies suggest that changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG) precede seizures by several minutes. In our work, we evaluated whether variations in heart rate could be used to predict epileptic seizures. Our findings indicate that we are still far from achieving results suitable for clinical application and highlight several limiting factors of present seizure prediction approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.13073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Up to a third of patients with epilepsy fail to achieve satisfactory seizure control. A reliable method of predicting seizures would alleviate psychological and physical impact. Dysregulation in heart rate variability (HRV) has been found to precede epileptic seizures and may serve as an extracerebral predictive biomarker. This study aims to identify the preictal HRV dynamics and unveil the factors impeding the clinical application of ECG-based seizure prediction.

Methods: Thirty-nine adult patients (eight women; median age: 38, [IQR = 31, 56.5]) with 252 seizures were included. Each patient had more than three recorded epileptic seizures, each at least 2 hours apart. For each seizure, one hour of ECG prior to seizure onset was analyzed and 97 HRV features were extracted from overlapping three-minute windows with 10s stride. Two separate patient-specific experiments were performed using a support vector machine (SVM). Firstly, the separability of training data was examined in a non-causal trial. Secondly, the prediction was attempted in pseudo-prospective conditions. Finally, visualized HRV data, clinical metadata, and results were correlated.

Results: The mean receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) for the non-causal experiment was 0.823 (±0.12), with 208 (82.5%) seizures achieving an improvement over chance (IoC) classification score (p < 0.05, Hanley & McNeil test). In pseudo-prospective classification, the ROC-AUC was 0.569 (±0.17), and 86 (49.4%) seizures were classified with IoC. Off-sample optimized SVMs failed to improve performance. Major limiting factors identified include non-stationarity, variable preictal duration and dynamics. The latter is expressed as both inter-seizure onset zone (SOZ) and intra-SOZ variability.

Significance: The pseudo-prospective preictal classification achieving IoC in approximately half of tested seizures suggests the presence of genuine preictal HRV dynamics, but the overall performance does not warrant clinical application at present. The limiting factors identified are often overlooked in non-causal study designs. While current deterministic prediction methods prove inadequate, probabilistic approaches may offer a promising alternative.

Plain language summary: Many patients with epilepsy suffer from uncontrollable seizures and would greatly benefit from a reliable seizure prediction method. Currently, no such system is available to meet this need. Previous studies suggest that changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG) precede seizures by several minutes. In our work, we evaluated whether variations in heart rate could be used to predict epileptic seizures. Our findings indicate that we are still far from achieving results suitable for clinical application and highlight several limiting factors of present seizure prediction approaches.

基于心电图的癫痫发作预测:当前数据驱动模型面临的挑战。
目的:多达三分之一的癫痫患者无法达到令人满意的发作控制效果。一种预测癫痫发作的可靠方法将减轻对患者心理和身体的影响。研究发现,心率变异性(HRV)失调可导致癫痫发作,并可作为脑外预测生物标志物。本研究旨在确定发作前的心率变异动态,并揭示阻碍基于心电图的癫痫发作预测临床应用的因素:共纳入 39 名有 252 次癫痫发作的成年患者(8 名女性;中位年龄:38,[IQR = 31,56.5])。每位患者都有三次以上的癫痫发作记录,每次间隔至少 2 小时。对每次癫痫发作前一小时的心电图进行分析,并从10秒跨度的三分钟重叠窗口中提取97个心率变异特征。使用支持向量机(SVM)分别进行了两项针对特定患者的实验。首先,在非因果试验中检验了训练数据的可分离性。其次,在伪前瞻性条件下尝试进行预测。最后,对可视化心率变异数据、临床元数据和结果进行了关联分析:结果:非因果实验的平均接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.823 (±0.12),208 次(82.5%)癫痫发作的分类得分比偶然性(IoC)有所改善(p 显著性):伪前瞻性发作前分类在大约一半的测试发作中达到了 IoC,这表明存在真正的发作前心率变异动态,但总体表现目前还不能保证临床应用。在非因果研究设计中,所发现的限制因素往往被忽视。虽然目前的确定性预测方法被证明是不够的,但概率方法可能会提供一种有前途的替代方法。白话摘要:许多癫痫患者都患有无法控制的癫痫发作,可靠的癫痫发作预测方法将使他们受益匪浅。目前还没有这样的系统来满足这一需求。以前的研究表明,心电图(ECG)的变化会在癫痫发作前几分钟出现。在我们的工作中,我们评估了心率变化是否可用于预测癫痫发作。我们的研究结果表明,我们离取得适合临床应用的结果还很遥远,并强调了目前癫痫发作预测方法的几个限制因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia Open
Epilepsia Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信