Inverse linear association between blood haemoglobin and oxygen saturation accuracy measured by pulse oximetry: a cross-sectional analysis in individuals with COVID-19 infection.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Colin J Crooks, Joe West, Jo R Morling, Mark Simmonds, Irene Juurlink, Steve Briggs, Simon Cruickshank, Susan Hammond-Pears, Dominick Shaw, Tim R Card, Andrew W Fogarty
{"title":"Inverse linear association between blood haemoglobin and oxygen saturation accuracy measured by pulse oximetry: a cross-sectional analysis in individuals with COVID-19 infection.","authors":"Colin J Crooks, Joe West, Jo R Morling, Mark Simmonds, Irene Juurlink, Steve Briggs, Simon Cruickshank, Susan Hammond-Pears, Dominick Shaw, Tim R Card, Andrew W Fogarty","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulse oximetry measures oxygen saturation non-invasively by using differential absorption of infrared signals which are dependent on the oxyhaemoglobin:deoxyhaemoglobin ratio. We tested the hypothesis that pulse oximetry error in measurements of blood oxygen saturations may be associated with blood haemoglobin levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study design was an observational study of all adult patients admitted to a large teaching hospital with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection from February 2020 to December 2021 who had arterial blood gases (ABG) drawn. The pulse oximetry reading was compared with the arterial saturation on the ABG and the measurement error was determined according to the ABG haemoglobin. A secondary analysis was performed among a subset of patients with venous haemoglobins drawn within 24 hours, comparing measurement error between ABG arterial saturation and pulse oximetry readings between those with normal (150 g/L) and low (70 g/L) haemoglobins.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis used 5922 paired oxygen saturations from 3994 patients with contemporaneous haemoglobin measurements by ABG. A 1 g/L decrease in blood haemoglobin was associated with an 0.021% (95% CI: +0.008% to +0.033%) increase in the measurement error (in the direction of a falsely elevated reading.). In the 1086 patients who had had a venous haemoglobin there was a 0.055% (95% CI: +0.020% to +0.090%) increase in the measurement error of oxygen saturation per 1 g/L decrease in blood haemoglobin. The measurement error was thus greater in those with anaemia than in those with normal haemoglobin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As blood haemoglobin decreases, the oxygen saturation measurement derived from a pulse oximeter reads erroneously higher than the true value measured by ABG. While this study was confined to patients with COVID-19, physicians should be aware of this potential discrepancy among all patients with haemorrhage or known anaemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2023-213712","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulse oximetry measures oxygen saturation non-invasively by using differential absorption of infrared signals which are dependent on the oxyhaemoglobin:deoxyhaemoglobin ratio. We tested the hypothesis that pulse oximetry error in measurements of blood oxygen saturations may be associated with blood haemoglobin levels.

Methods: The study design was an observational study of all adult patients admitted to a large teaching hospital with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection from February 2020 to December 2021 who had arterial blood gases (ABG) drawn. The pulse oximetry reading was compared with the arterial saturation on the ABG and the measurement error was determined according to the ABG haemoglobin. A secondary analysis was performed among a subset of patients with venous haemoglobins drawn within 24 hours, comparing measurement error between ABG arterial saturation and pulse oximetry readings between those with normal (150 g/L) and low (70 g/L) haemoglobins.

Results: The analysis used 5922 paired oxygen saturations from 3994 patients with contemporaneous haemoglobin measurements by ABG. A 1 g/L decrease in blood haemoglobin was associated with an 0.021% (95% CI: +0.008% to +0.033%) increase in the measurement error (in the direction of a falsely elevated reading.). In the 1086 patients who had had a venous haemoglobin there was a 0.055% (95% CI: +0.020% to +0.090%) increase in the measurement error of oxygen saturation per 1 g/L decrease in blood haemoglobin. The measurement error was thus greater in those with anaemia than in those with normal haemoglobin.

Conclusion: As blood haemoglobin decreases, the oxygen saturation measurement derived from a pulse oximeter reads erroneously higher than the true value measured by ABG. While this study was confined to patients with COVID-19, physicians should be aware of this potential discrepancy among all patients with haemorrhage or known anaemia.

脉搏血氧仪测量的血红蛋白与血氧饱和度准确性之间的反向线性关系:对 COVID-19 感染者的横断面分析。
背景:脉搏血氧仪通过红外信号的差分吸收测量血氧饱和度,而红外信号的差分吸收取决于氧合血红蛋白与脱氧血红蛋白的比率。我们测试了脉搏氧饱和度测量误差可能与血红蛋白水平有关的假设:研究设计为一项观察性研究,研究对象为 2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 12 月期间入住一家大型教学医院、疑似或确诊感染 COVID-19 并抽取动脉血气 (ABG) 的所有成人患者。将脉搏血氧仪读数与 ABG 上的动脉饱和度进行比较,并根据 ABG 血红蛋白确定测量误差。对 24 小时内抽取静脉血红蛋白的患者子集进行了二次分析,比较血红蛋白正常(150 克/升)和低(70 克/升)患者 ABG 动脉饱和度与脉搏氧饱和度读数之间的测量误差:分析使用了 3994 名患者的 5922 个配对血氧饱和度,并通过 ABG 进行了同期血红蛋白测量。血红蛋白每降低 1 克/升,测量误差就会增加 0.021%(95% CI:+0.008% 至 +0.033%)(误差方向为读数升高)。在 1086 名进行过静脉血红蛋白检测的患者中,血红蛋白每下降 1 克/升,血氧饱和度的测量误差就会增加 0.055% (95% CI: +0.020% to +0.090%)。因此,贫血患者的测量误差大于血红蛋白正常者:结论:随着血红蛋白的降低,脉搏氧饱和度测量值会错误地高于 ABG 测量的真实值。虽然本研究仅限于 COVID-19 患者,但医生应注意所有大出血或已知贫血患者的这种潜在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信