The long-term conditional mortality rate in older ICU patients compared to the general population.

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Anna Aronsson Dannewitz, Bodil Svennblad, Karl Michaëlsson, Miklos Lipcsey, Rolf Gedeborg
{"title":"The long-term conditional mortality rate in older ICU patients compared to the general population.","authors":"Anna Aronsson Dannewitz, Bodil Svennblad, Karl Michaëlsson, Miklos Lipcsey, Rolf Gedeborg","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05147-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding how preexisting comorbidities may interact with a critical illness is important for the assessment of long-term survival probability of older patients admitted to the ICU.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The mortality after a first ICU admission in patients ≥ 55 years old registered in the Swedish Intensive Care Registry was compared to age- and sex-matched individuals from the general population with a landmark after 1 year. The comparison was adjusted for age, sex, and baseline comorbidity using Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 7-year study period included 140 008 patients, of whom 23% were 80 years or older. Patients surviving the first year remained at an increased risk compared to the general population, but much of this difference was attenuated after adjustment for baseline comorbidity (HR, 1.03; 95% CI 1.02-1.04). Excluding cardio-thoracic ICU admissions, the increased risk remained slightly elevated (adjusted HR, 1.15; 95% CI 1.13-1.16). Also, the subgroup ≥ 75 years old surviving the first year returned to a mortality rate comparable to the general population (HR, 0.98; 95% CI 0.96-0.99). Stratified by admission diagnosis an increased mortality rate remained beyond the first year for acute-on-chronic respiratory failure (adjusted HR, 1.47; 95% CI 1.36-1.58) but not for other respiratory causes (adjusted HR, 1.03; 95% CI 0.99-1.07) or admission for septic shock (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI 0.95-1.13). No substantial increased mortality rate was notable beyond the first year for other admission diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older ICU patients that survive the first year after an ICU admission return to a mortality rate close to that of the general population having similar baseline comorbidity, but variability is seen depending on the ICU admission diagnosis. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06234709, date 02/01/2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"28 1","pages":"368"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05147-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding how preexisting comorbidities may interact with a critical illness is important for the assessment of long-term survival probability of older patients admitted to the ICU.

Material and methods: The mortality after a first ICU admission in patients ≥ 55 years old registered in the Swedish Intensive Care Registry was compared to age- and sex-matched individuals from the general population with a landmark after 1 year. The comparison was adjusted for age, sex, and baseline comorbidity using Cox regression.

Results: The 7-year study period included 140 008 patients, of whom 23% were 80 years or older. Patients surviving the first year remained at an increased risk compared to the general population, but much of this difference was attenuated after adjustment for baseline comorbidity (HR, 1.03; 95% CI 1.02-1.04). Excluding cardio-thoracic ICU admissions, the increased risk remained slightly elevated (adjusted HR, 1.15; 95% CI 1.13-1.16). Also, the subgroup ≥ 75 years old surviving the first year returned to a mortality rate comparable to the general population (HR, 0.98; 95% CI 0.96-0.99). Stratified by admission diagnosis an increased mortality rate remained beyond the first year for acute-on-chronic respiratory failure (adjusted HR, 1.47; 95% CI 1.36-1.58) but not for other respiratory causes (adjusted HR, 1.03; 95% CI 0.99-1.07) or admission for septic shock (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI 0.95-1.13). No substantial increased mortality rate was notable beyond the first year for other admission diagnoses.

Conclusion: Older ICU patients that survive the first year after an ICU admission return to a mortality rate close to that of the general population having similar baseline comorbidity, but variability is seen depending on the ICU admission diagnosis. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06234709, date 02/01/2024.

与普通人群相比,ICU 老年患者的长期条件死亡率。
背景:了解原有的合并症如何与危重症相互作用,对于评估入住重症监护病房的老年患者的长期生存概率非常重要:将瑞典重症监护登记处登记的 55 岁以上患者首次入住重症监护室后的死亡率与普通人群中年龄和性别匹配的患者进行比较,以 1 年后的死亡率为基准。比较采用 Cox 回归法对年龄、性别和基线合并症进行了调整:为期 7 年的研究共纳入 140 008 名患者,其中 23% 为 80 岁或以上。与普通人群相比,第一年存活的患者风险仍然较高,但在调整基线合并症后,这种差异有所减小(HR,1.03;95% CI 1.02-1.04)。剔除入住心胸重症监护室的患者后,增加的风险仍略有上升(调整后的 HR 为 1.15;95% CI 为 1.13-1.16)。此外,≥75 岁的亚组在第一年存活的死亡率与普通人群相当(HR,0.98;95% CI 0.96-0.99)。根据入院诊断进行分层,急性-慢性呼吸衰竭(调整后 HR,1.47;95% CI,1.36-1.58)的死亡率在第一年后仍会增加,但其他呼吸系统原因(调整后 HR,1.03;95% CI,0.99-1.07)或因脓毒性休克入院(调整后 HR,1.04;95% CI,0.95-1.13)的死亡率则不会增加。其他入院诊断的死亡率在第一年后没有显著增加:结论:ICU老年患者在入院后第一年内的死亡率接近于具有相似基线合并症的普通人群,但根据ICU入院诊断的不同,死亡率也存在差异。试验注册 ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT06234709,日期为 2024 年 1 月 2 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信