Influences on the physical activity behaviour of inpatients after stroke outside of staff-led rehabilitation sessions: a systematic review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Peter Hartley, Katie Bond, Rachel Dance, Isla Kuhn, Joanne McPeake, Faye Forsyth
{"title":"Influences on the physical activity behaviour of inpatients after stroke outside of staff-led rehabilitation sessions: a systematic review.","authors":"Peter Hartley, Katie Bond, Rachel Dance, Isla Kuhn, Joanne McPeake, Faye Forsyth","doi":"10.1177/02692155241293269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To use behavioural science frameworks to synthesise evidence on the factors influencing physical activity of patients hospitalised after stroke outside of staff-led rehabilitation sessions.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic review of qualitative and mixed-methods studies. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and AMED were searched from inception to October 2024 for studies that explored influences on the physical activity of patients hospitalised after stroke.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Data were coded with reference to the Theoretical Domains Framework and the COM-B ('capability', 'opportunity', 'motivation' and 'behaviour') model. Thematic analysis was used to group data extracts into themes within each Theoretical Domains Framework domain. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 17 studies. There was no significant risk of bias concerns. We identified 19 themes across eight Theoretical Domains Framework domains and all COM-B model categories. The most frequently recognised themes were found in three Theoretical Domains Framework domains: Environmental Context and Resources (themes: 1 -- availability of sufficient skilled staff to facilitate physical activity; 2 - design and use of the physical environment; 3 - lack of opportunities or incentives; 4 - passivity and institutionalisation; 5 - perceived and actual rules and culture of the ward); Skills (theme: physical impairments); and Social Influences (theme: activity influenced by family and friends).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review highlights the complexity of the influences on the physical activity of patients hospitalised after stroke outside of staff-led rehabilitation sessions. It is likely multi-component interventions addressing a number of influences will be required to effectively improve physical activity. PROSPERO ID: CRD42022383506.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155241293269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241293269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To use behavioural science frameworks to synthesise evidence on the factors influencing physical activity of patients hospitalised after stroke outside of staff-led rehabilitation sessions.

Data sources: A systematic review of qualitative and mixed-methods studies. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and AMED were searched from inception to October 2024 for studies that explored influences on the physical activity of patients hospitalised after stroke.

Review methods: Data were coded with reference to the Theoretical Domains Framework and the COM-B ('capability', 'opportunity', 'motivation' and 'behaviour') model. Thematic analysis was used to group data extracts into themes within each Theoretical Domains Framework domain. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Results: We identified 17 studies. There was no significant risk of bias concerns. We identified 19 themes across eight Theoretical Domains Framework domains and all COM-B model categories. The most frequently recognised themes were found in three Theoretical Domains Framework domains: Environmental Context and Resources (themes: 1 -- availability of sufficient skilled staff to facilitate physical activity; 2 - design and use of the physical environment; 3 - lack of opportunities or incentives; 4 - passivity and institutionalisation; 5 - perceived and actual rules and culture of the ward); Skills (theme: physical impairments); and Social Influences (theme: activity influenced by family and friends).

Conclusions: The review highlights the complexity of the influences on the physical activity of patients hospitalised after stroke outside of staff-led rehabilitation sessions. It is likely multi-component interventions addressing a number of influences will be required to effectively improve physical activity. PROSPERO ID: CRD42022383506.

中风后住院病人在工作人员指导的康复课程之外进行体育锻炼的影响因素:系统综述。
目的利用行为科学框架来综合有关影响中风后住院患者在工作人员指导的康复课程之外进行体育锻炼的因素的证据:数据来源: 定性研究和混合方法研究的系统综述。对 MEDLINE、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和 AMED 从开始到 2024 年 10 月的资料进行了检索,以了解探讨影响中风后住院患者体力活动的因素的研究:参照理论领域框架和 COM-B("能力"、"机会"、"动机 "和 "行为")模型对数据进行编码。采用主题分析法将数据摘录归类为理论领域框架各领域中的主题。使用混合方法评估工具对偏倚风险进行了评估:我们确定了 17 项研究。没有重大的偏倚风险问题。我们在八个理论领域框架领域和所有 COM-B 模型类别中确定了 19 个主题。最常见的主题出现在三个理论领域框架中:环境背景和资源(主题:1 - 是否有足够的熟练工作人员来促进体育活动;2 - 物理环境的设计和使用;3 - 缺乏机会或激励措施;4 - 被动性和制度化;5 - 感知到的和实际的病房规则和文化);技能(主题:身体缺陷);以及社会影响(主题:受家人和朋友影响的活动):综述强调了中风后住院患者在工作人员指导的康复课程之外进行体育活动的复杂性。要有效提高患者的体力活动,可能需要针对多种影响因素采取多成分干预措施。PROSPERO ID:CRD42022383506。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信