Clinicopathologic features and treatment efficacy of patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-center real-world propensity score matching study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Gui-Xia Wei, Yu-Wen Zhou, Chao Dong, Tao Zhang, Peng Cao, Lin Xie, Meng Qiu
{"title":"Clinicopathologic features and treatment efficacy of patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-center real-world propensity score matching study.","authors":"Gui-Xia Wei, Yu-Wen Zhou, Chao Dong, Tao Zhang, Peng Cao, Lin Xie, Meng Qiu","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13171-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with BRAF 600E mutated mCRC are associated with specific clinicopathological features and poor prognosis. The relative efficacy of first-line FOLFOXIRI triplet chemotherapy or doublet chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab in patients with BRAF 600E mutated mCRC remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC patients from 3 institutions were included. The clinicopathological characteristics of the enrolled patients were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) of patients was divided into 4 fractions, including 0-25%, 25-50%, 50-75%,75-100% by quartile method. Patients with OS ranging from 0 to 25% were defined as the poor prognosis group, and patients with OS ranging from 75 to 100% were defined as the good prognosis group. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to balance the baseline characteristics of patients treated with doublet chemotherapy and triplet chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab. Survival and tumor response of the two regimens were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 125 patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC were enrolled. The median OS of BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC was 14.9 months and the median PFS of first-line therapy was 6.1 months. According to the multivariate analysis and the difference in baseline characteristics between the poor prognosis group and the good prognosis group, poor differentiation and liver metastasis were negative independent prognostic factors for OS in patientsx with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC. Patients treated with first-line triplets had a longer OS than those treated with doublets both before PSM (17.4 months vs. 13.4 months, p = 0.022) and after PSM (17.4 months vs. 10.4 months, p = 0.004). There was no significant benefit between triplet-drug group and doublet-drug group for PFS, ORR and DCR. Subgroup analysis showed that patients in the triplet-drug group had a better prognosis with the following favorable factors: age ≤ 60 years old, PS score of 0-1, liver metastases and multiple organ metastases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall prognosis of BRAF V600E mutant mCRC patients is poor. Poor differentiation and liver metastases were negative independent prognostic factors for OS. First-line triplet-drug therapy was associated with better OS, especially in patients with good physical condition and high tumor burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1395"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13171-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with BRAF 600E mutated mCRC are associated with specific clinicopathological features and poor prognosis. The relative efficacy of first-line FOLFOXIRI triplet chemotherapy or doublet chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab in patients with BRAF 600E mutated mCRC remains controversial.

Methods: BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC patients from 3 institutions were included. The clinicopathological characteristics of the enrolled patients were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) of patients was divided into 4 fractions, including 0-25%, 25-50%, 50-75%,75-100% by quartile method. Patients with OS ranging from 0 to 25% were defined as the poor prognosis group, and patients with OS ranging from 75 to 100% were defined as the good prognosis group. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to balance the baseline characteristics of patients treated with doublet chemotherapy and triplet chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab. Survival and tumor response of the two regimens were evaluated.

Results: A total of 125 patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC were enrolled. The median OS of BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC was 14.9 months and the median PFS of first-line therapy was 6.1 months. According to the multivariate analysis and the difference in baseline characteristics between the poor prognosis group and the good prognosis group, poor differentiation and liver metastasis were negative independent prognostic factors for OS in patientsx with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC. Patients treated with first-line triplets had a longer OS than those treated with doublets both before PSM (17.4 months vs. 13.4 months, p = 0.022) and after PSM (17.4 months vs. 10.4 months, p = 0.004). There was no significant benefit between triplet-drug group and doublet-drug group for PFS, ORR and DCR. Subgroup analysis showed that patients in the triplet-drug group had a better prognosis with the following favorable factors: age ≤ 60 years old, PS score of 0-1, liver metastases and multiple organ metastases.

Conclusion: The overall prognosis of BRAF V600E mutant mCRC patients is poor. Poor differentiation and liver metastases were negative independent prognostic factors for OS. First-line triplet-drug therapy was associated with better OS, especially in patients with good physical condition and high tumor burden.

BRAF V600E突变转移性结直肠癌患者的临床病理特征和疗效:一项多中心真实世界倾向评分匹配研究。
背景:BRAF 600E 突变的 mCRC 患者具有特殊的临床病理特征,预后较差。对于 BRAF 600E 突变 mCRC 患者,一线 FOLFOXIRI 三联化疗或双联化疗联合贝伐单抗的相对疗效仍存在争议:方法:纳入3家机构的BRAF V600E突变mCRC患者。分析了入组患者的临床病理特征。采用四分位法将患者的总生存率(OS)分为4个部分,包括0-25%、25-50%、50-75%、75-100%。OS在0-25%之间的患者被定义为预后不良组,OS在75-100%之间的患者被定义为预后良好组。为了平衡双联化疗和三联化疗联合贝伐珠单抗治疗患者的基线特征,我们进行了倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析。对两种方案的生存期和肿瘤反应进行了评估:共有125名BRAF V600E突变mCRC患者入组。BRAF V600E突变mCRC的中位OS为14.9个月,一线治疗的中位PFS为6.1个月。根据多变量分析和预后不良组与预后良好组基线特征的差异,分化不良和肝转移是影响BRAF V600E突变mCRC患者OS的负独立预后因素。在 PSM 前(17.4 个月 vs. 13.4 个月,p = 0.022)和 PSM 后(17.4 个月 vs. 10.4 个月,p = 0.004),接受一线三联疗法治疗的患者的 OS 均长于接受二联疗法治疗的患者。三联药物组与双联药物组在PFS、ORR和DCR方面没有明显优势。亚组分析显示,三联用药组患者的预后较好,其有利因素包括:年龄≤60岁、PS评分0-1分、肝转移和多器官转移:结论:BRAF V600E突变mCRC患者的总体预后较差。结论:BRAF V600E突变型mCRC患者的总体预后较差,分化不良和肝转移是影响OS的负性独立预后因素。一线三联药物治疗与较好的预后相关,尤其是对身体状况好、肿瘤负荷高的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信