Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases among women in a South Asian population: a descriptive study of modifiable risk factors.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rubina Rauf, Muhammad Nauman Khan, Jawaid Akbar Sial, Nadeem Qamar, Tahir Saghir, Khawar Abbas Kazmi
{"title":"Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases among women in a South Asian population: a descriptive study of modifiable risk factors.","authors":"Rubina Rauf, Muhammad Nauman Khan, Jawaid Akbar Sial, Nadeem Qamar, Tahir Saghir, Khawar Abbas Kazmi","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was the assessment of modifiable risk factors of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) among women versus men at a newly developed preventive cardiology clinic of a large tertiary care cardiac centre in Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care cardiac hospital in Karachi, Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Data for this study were obtained retrospectively from a prospectively collected ongoing registry. We have included all female and male individuals who have presented or were referred to our clinic for primary prevention. All the participants had no history of ischaemic heart disease.</p><p><strong>Outcome measure: </strong>In this study, we evaluated the CVD risk factors, estimated risk of CVD, and glycaemic and cholesterol control at baseline and at subsequent follow-ups for high-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 535 patients, 314 females, were included with a mean age of 48.3±12.5 years. At baseline, 57.9% (128) of men versus 73.2% (230) of women (p<0.001) were known cases of hypertension (HTN); 18.1% (40) vs 26.8% (84) (p=0.019) were diabetic; 40.5% (89) vs 9.2% (29) (p<0.001) were tobacco users; 26.0% (56) vs 3.2% (10) (p<0.001) were smokers; and 26.9% (57) vs 50.5% (153) had BMI ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively.Baseline atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score was available for 348 (65%), 61.5% (136) of men versus 67.5% (212) of women. The median ASCVD risk score was 6.8% (2.8%-16.1%) vs 2.25% (1%-5.1%) (p<0.001 for men and women, respectively). The ASCVD risk score was ≥20% (high risk) for 22.1% (30) vs 1.9% (4), while the ASCVD risk score was <5% (low risk) for 40.4% (55) vs 74.1% (157) of men and women, respectively.A repeat ASCVD assessment at a median follow-up of 49.5 (7.0-231) days was available for 259 (48.4%) patients, 26.2% (58) of men vs 64% (201) of women, respectively. The median follow-up ASCVD score was 6.55% (2.8%-15.4%) vs 2.1% (0.9%-4.8%) (p<0.001 with ≥20% (high risk) in 19% (11) vs 2% (4) and <5% (low risk) in 34.5% (20) vs 77.1% (155) of men and women, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a high prevalence of modifiable risk factors for atherosclerotic CVD such as HTN, diabetes and obesity in women as compared with men, but interestingly, ASCVD risk score at the baseline as well as at the follow-up is high in men versus women. Some other non-modifiable risk factors like age, gender and blood lipid profile may also contribute to this difference between the high prevalence of risk factors and low ASCVD risk score in women. With appropriate follow-up and proper counselling, the looming CVD can be better prevented in this population. A dedicated preventive cardiology clinic for the identification of high-risk women and systematic follow-up is needed to predict their actual CVD risk.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT06503341.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"14 11","pages":"e089149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089149","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was the assessment of modifiable risk factors of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) among women versus men at a newly developed preventive cardiology clinic of a large tertiary care cardiac centre in Pakistan.

Design: Observational study.

Setting: Tertiary care cardiac hospital in Karachi, Pakistan.

Participants: Data for this study were obtained retrospectively from a prospectively collected ongoing registry. We have included all female and male individuals who have presented or were referred to our clinic for primary prevention. All the participants had no history of ischaemic heart disease.

Outcome measure: In this study, we evaluated the CVD risk factors, estimated risk of CVD, and glycaemic and cholesterol control at baseline and at subsequent follow-ups for high-risk patients.

Results: A total of 535 patients, 314 females, were included with a mean age of 48.3±12.5 years. At baseline, 57.9% (128) of men versus 73.2% (230) of women (p<0.001) were known cases of hypertension (HTN); 18.1% (40) vs 26.8% (84) (p=0.019) were diabetic; 40.5% (89) vs 9.2% (29) (p<0.001) were tobacco users; 26.0% (56) vs 3.2% (10) (p<0.001) were smokers; and 26.9% (57) vs 50.5% (153) had BMI ≥30 kg/m2, respectively.Baseline atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score was available for 348 (65%), 61.5% (136) of men versus 67.5% (212) of women. The median ASCVD risk score was 6.8% (2.8%-16.1%) vs 2.25% (1%-5.1%) (p<0.001 for men and women, respectively). The ASCVD risk score was ≥20% (high risk) for 22.1% (30) vs 1.9% (4), while the ASCVD risk score was <5% (low risk) for 40.4% (55) vs 74.1% (157) of men and women, respectively.A repeat ASCVD assessment at a median follow-up of 49.5 (7.0-231) days was available for 259 (48.4%) patients, 26.2% (58) of men vs 64% (201) of women, respectively. The median follow-up ASCVD score was 6.55% (2.8%-15.4%) vs 2.1% (0.9%-4.8%) (p<0.001 with ≥20% (high risk) in 19% (11) vs 2% (4) and <5% (low risk) in 34.5% (20) vs 77.1% (155) of men and women, respectively).

Conclusions: There is a high prevalence of modifiable risk factors for atherosclerotic CVD such as HTN, diabetes and obesity in women as compared with men, but interestingly, ASCVD risk score at the baseline as well as at the follow-up is high in men versus women. Some other non-modifiable risk factors like age, gender and blood lipid profile may also contribute to this difference between the high prevalence of risk factors and low ASCVD risk score in women. With appropriate follow-up and proper counselling, the looming CVD can be better prevented in this population. A dedicated preventive cardiology clinic for the identification of high-risk women and systematic follow-up is needed to predict their actual CVD risk.

Trial registration: NCT06503341.

南亚人口中妇女心血管疾病的初级预防:可改变风险因素的描述性研究。
研究目的本研究旨在评估巴基斯坦一家大型三级心脏病治疗中心新开设的预防心脏病诊所中女性与男性心血管疾病(CVD)的可改变风险因素:设计:观察研究:地点:巴基斯坦卡拉奇三级心脏病医院:本研究的数据来自前瞻性收集的持续登记。我们纳入了所有曾在本诊所就诊或被转诊到本诊所接受一级预防的女性和男性患者。结果测量:在这项研究中,我们评估了心血管疾病的风险因素、心血管疾病的估计风险以及高危患者在基线和后续随访中的血糖和胆固醇控制情况:共纳入 535 名患者,其中女性 314 人,平均年龄(48.3±12.5)岁。基线动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险评分为348人(65%),其中男性为61.5%(136人),女性为67.5%(212人)。ASCVD 风险评分的中位数为 6.8% (2.8%-16.1%) vs 2.25% (1%-5.1%)(P结论:与男性相比,女性高血压、糖尿病和肥胖等可改变的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险因素的发生率较高,但有趣的是,男性在基线和随访时的 ASCVD 风险评分均高于女性。其他一些不可改变的风险因素,如年龄、性别和血脂状况,也可能是造成女性高风险因素发生率和低 ASCVD 风险得分之间差异的原因。通过适当的随访和适当的咨询,可以更好地预防这一人群中迫在眉睫的心血管疾病。需要设立专门的预防性心脏病诊所来识别高风险女性并进行系统的随访,以预测她们的实际心血管疾病风险:试验注册:NCT06503341。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信