Effect of goal-directed mobilisation versus standard care on physical functioning among medical inpatients: the GoMob-in randomised, controlled trial.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Fabian D Liechti, Jeannelle Heinzmann, Nina A Schmutz, Michael L Rossen, Jean-Benoît Rossel, Andreas Limacher, Joachim M Schmidt Leuenberger, Christine Baumgartner, Maria M Wertli, Drahomir Aujesky, Martin Verra, Carole E Aubert
{"title":"Effect of goal-directed mobilisation versus standard care on physical functioning among medical inpatients: the GoMob-in randomised, controlled trial.","authors":"Fabian D Liechti, Jeannelle Heinzmann, Nina A Schmutz, Michael L Rossen, Jean-Benoît Rossel, Andreas Limacher, Joachim M Schmidt Leuenberger, Christine Baumgartner, Maria M Wertli, Drahomir Aujesky, Martin Verra, Carole E Aubert","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effect of goal-directed mobilisation (GDM) on physical functioning in medical inpatients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomised, controlled, single-centre, parallel, superiority trial with a 3-month follow-up and blinded outcome assessment.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>General internal medicine wards of a Swiss tertiary acute hospital, September 2021 to April 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults with expected hospitalisation of ≥5 days, physiotherapy prescription and ability to follow study procedures.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>GDM during hospitalisation, which includes personal goal setting and a short session of patient education through a physiotherapist (experimental group), versus standard care (control group).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the change in physical activity between baseline and day 5 (De Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI)). Secondary outcomes included in-hospital accelerometer-measured mobilisation time; in-hospital falls; delirium; length of stay; change in independence in activities of daily living, concerns of falling and quality of life; falls, readmission and mortality within 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study was completed by 123 of 162 (76%) patients enrolled, with the primary outcome collected at day 5 in 126 (78%) participants. DEMMI Score improved by 8.2 (SD 15.1) points in the control group and 9.4 (SD 14.2) in the intervention group, with a mean difference of 0.3 (adjusted for the stratification factors age and initial DEMMI Score, 95% CI -4.1 to 4.8, p=0.88). We did not observe a statistically significant difference in effects of the interventions on any secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patient's physical functioning improved during hospitalisation, but the improvement was similar for GDM and standard of care. Improving physical activity during an acute medical hospitalisation remains challenging. Future interventions should target additional barriers that can be implemented without augmenting resources.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04760392.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086921","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of goal-directed mobilisation (GDM) on physical functioning in medical inpatients.

Design: Randomised, controlled, single-centre, parallel, superiority trial with a 3-month follow-up and blinded outcome assessment.

Setting: General internal medicine wards of a Swiss tertiary acute hospital, September 2021 to April 2023.

Participants: Adults with expected hospitalisation of ≥5 days, physiotherapy prescription and ability to follow study procedures.

Intervention: GDM during hospitalisation, which includes personal goal setting and a short session of patient education through a physiotherapist (experimental group), versus standard care (control group).

Outcome measures: The primary outcome was the change in physical activity between baseline and day 5 (De Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI)). Secondary outcomes included in-hospital accelerometer-measured mobilisation time; in-hospital falls; delirium; length of stay; change in independence in activities of daily living, concerns of falling and quality of life; falls, readmission and mortality within 3 months.

Results: The study was completed by 123 of 162 (76%) patients enrolled, with the primary outcome collected at day 5 in 126 (78%) participants. DEMMI Score improved by 8.2 (SD 15.1) points in the control group and 9.4 (SD 14.2) in the intervention group, with a mean difference of 0.3 (adjusted for the stratification factors age and initial DEMMI Score, 95% CI -4.1 to 4.8, p=0.88). We did not observe a statistically significant difference in effects of the interventions on any secondary outcome.

Conclusions: The patient's physical functioning improved during hospitalisation, but the improvement was similar for GDM and standard of care. Improving physical activity during an acute medical hospitalisation remains challenging. Future interventions should target additional barriers that can be implemented without augmenting resources.

Trial registration number: NCT04760392.

目标定向移动与标准护理对住院病人身体功能的影响:GoMob-in 随机对照试验。
目标评估目标定向移动(GDM)对住院病人身体功能的影响:随机、对照、单中心、平行、优越性试验,随访 3 个月,对结果进行盲法评估:2021 年 9 月至 2023 年 4 月,瑞士一家三级急症医院的普通内科病房:干预措施:干预措施:住院期间的 GDM,包括个人目标设定和通过物理治疗师进行的短期患者教育(实验组)与标准护理(对照组):主要结果是基线和第 5 天之间体力活动的变化(De Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI))。次要结果包括院内加速计测量的活动时间;院内跌倒;谵妄;住院时间;日常生活活动独立性的变化、对跌倒的担忧和生活质量;跌倒、再入院和3个月内的死亡率:162名患者中有123人(76%)完成了研究,其中126人(78%)在第5天获得了主要研究结果。对照组的 DEMMI 评分提高了 8.2 分(标准差 15.1 分),干预组提高了 9.4 分(标准差 14.2 分),平均差异为 0.3 分(根据年龄和初始 DEMMI 评分的分层因素进行调整后,95% CI -4.1 至 4.8,P=0.88)。我们没有观察到干预措施对任何次要结果的影响有显著的统计学差异:结论:住院期间患者的身体机能有所改善,但GDM和标准护理的改善效果相似。在急性内科住院期间改善体力活动仍具有挑战性。未来的干预措施应针对无需增加资源即可实施的其他障碍:NCT04760392.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信