Comparison of the aetiology, microbiological isolates and antibiotic susceptibilities of endophthalmitis between children and adults in southern China: a retrospective, cohort study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yao Yang, Jiaqi Lin, Yujie Li, Xiaohu Ding, Manli Liu, Jieting Zeng, Xiaofeng Lin, Fang Duan
{"title":"Comparison of the aetiology, microbiological isolates and antibiotic susceptibilities of endophthalmitis between children and adults in southern China: a retrospective, cohort study.","authors":"Yao Yang, Jiaqi Lin, Yujie Li, Xiaohu Ding, Manli Liu, Jieting Zeng, Xiaofeng Lin, Fang Duan","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare aetiology, microbiological isolates and antibiotic susceptibilities of endophthalmitis between children and adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients admitted to Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center between January 2013 and December 2019 with clinically diagnosed endophthalmitis were included.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The aetiology, microbiological isolates and antibiotic susceptibilities of endophthalmitis were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1803 patients, 430 (23.8%) were aged ≤16 years. In both children and adults, the main aetiology was trauma (85.6% vs 64.7%, p<0.05). <i>Streptococcus</i> species (spp.) (28.8%) were most prevalent in paediatric post-traumatic endophthalmitis; whereas, coagulase-negative staphylococci (36.9%) were dominant in adults. In postoperative endophthalmitis, all children had bacterial infections, while fungal infections accounted for 12.5% in adults. In endogenous endophthalmitis caused by fungi, <i>Candida</i> was most prevalent in adults (26.9%); whereas, all causative fungi involved filamentous fungi in children. Isolated bacteria in children presented a higher susceptibility in 7 of 11 antibiotics compared with those in adults. Levofloxacin had the highest susceptibility rate in children (97.9%), and ofloxacin had the highest susceptibility rate in adults (90.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The main aetiology was trauma, with a higher proportion in children than in adults. The microbial profile of paediatric endophthalmitis was different from those of adults. Susceptibilities of causative bacteria to most antibiotics were higher in children than in adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare aetiology, microbiological isolates and antibiotic susceptibilities of endophthalmitis between children and adults.

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Participants: Patients admitted to Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center between January 2013 and December 2019 with clinically diagnosed endophthalmitis were included.

Outcome measures: The aetiology, microbiological isolates and antibiotic susceptibilities of endophthalmitis were analysed.

Results: Of 1803 patients, 430 (23.8%) were aged ≤16 years. In both children and adults, the main aetiology was trauma (85.6% vs 64.7%, p<0.05). Streptococcus species (spp.) (28.8%) were most prevalent in paediatric post-traumatic endophthalmitis; whereas, coagulase-negative staphylococci (36.9%) were dominant in adults. In postoperative endophthalmitis, all children had bacterial infections, while fungal infections accounted for 12.5% in adults. In endogenous endophthalmitis caused by fungi, Candida was most prevalent in adults (26.9%); whereas, all causative fungi involved filamentous fungi in children. Isolated bacteria in children presented a higher susceptibility in 7 of 11 antibiotics compared with those in adults. Levofloxacin had the highest susceptibility rate in children (97.9%), and ofloxacin had the highest susceptibility rate in adults (90.6%).

Conclusion: The main aetiology was trauma, with a higher proportion in children than in adults. The microbial profile of paediatric endophthalmitis was different from those of adults. Susceptibilities of causative bacteria to most antibiotics were higher in children than in adults.

中国南方儿童和成人眼底病病因、微生物分离物和抗生素敏感性的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:比较儿童和成人眼内炎的病因、微生物分离和抗生素敏感性:比较儿童和成人眼内炎的病因、微生物分离物和抗生素敏感性:回顾性观察研究:结果测量:分析眼底病的病因、微生物分离物和抗生素敏感性:结果:在 1803 名患者中,430 人(23.8%)的年龄小于 16 岁。在儿童和成人中,主要病因都是外伤(85.6% 对 64.7%),在儿童外伤后眼内炎中最常见的是链球菌(28.8%),而在成人中则主要是凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(36.9%)。在术后眼内炎中,所有儿童均为细菌感染,而成人中真菌感染占 12.5%。在由真菌引起的内源性眼内炎中,念珠菌在成人中最常见(26.9%);而在儿童中,所有致病真菌均为丝状真菌。在 11 种抗生素中,儿童对其中 7 种的敏感性高于成人。儿童对左氧氟沙星的敏感率最高(97.9%),成人对氧氟沙星的敏感率最高(90.6%):结论:主要病因是外伤,儿童的比例高于成人。儿童眼内炎的微生物特征与成人不同。儿童对大多数抗生素的敏感性高于成人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信