{"title":"Determining doses for backfill cohorts based on patient-reported outcome.","authors":"Xin Chen, Jingyi Zhang, Bosheng Li, Fangrong Yan","doi":"10.1186/s12874-024-02398-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incorporating backfill cohorts in phase I oncology trials is a recently developed strategy for dose optimization. However, the efficacy assessment window is long in general, causing a lag in identifying ineffective doses and more patients being backfilled to those doses. There is necessity to investigate how to use patient-reported outcomes (PRO) to determine doses for backfill cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We propose a unified Bayesian design framework, called 'Backfill-QoL', to utilize patient-reported quality of life (QoL) data into phase I oncology trials with backfill cohorts, including methods for trial monitoring, algorithm for dose-finding, and criteria for dose selection. Simulation studies and sensitivity analyses are conducted to evaluate the proposed Backfill-QoL design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The simulation studies demonstrate that the Backfill-QoL design is more efficient than traditional dose-expansion strategy, and fewer patients would be allocated to doses with unacceptable QoL profiles. A user-friendly Windows desktop application is developed and freely available for implementing the proposed design.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Backfill-QoL design enables continuous monitoring of safety, efficacy and QoL outcomes, and the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) can be identified in a more patient-centered perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"24 1","pages":"270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02398-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Incorporating backfill cohorts in phase I oncology trials is a recently developed strategy for dose optimization. However, the efficacy assessment window is long in general, causing a lag in identifying ineffective doses and more patients being backfilled to those doses. There is necessity to investigate how to use patient-reported outcomes (PRO) to determine doses for backfill cohorts.
Methods: We propose a unified Bayesian design framework, called 'Backfill-QoL', to utilize patient-reported quality of life (QoL) data into phase I oncology trials with backfill cohorts, including methods for trial monitoring, algorithm for dose-finding, and criteria for dose selection. Simulation studies and sensitivity analyses are conducted to evaluate the proposed Backfill-QoL design.
Results: The simulation studies demonstrate that the Backfill-QoL design is more efficient than traditional dose-expansion strategy, and fewer patients would be allocated to doses with unacceptable QoL profiles. A user-friendly Windows desktop application is developed and freely available for implementing the proposed design.
Conclusions: The Backfill-QoL design enables continuous monitoring of safety, efficacy and QoL outcomes, and the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) can be identified in a more patient-centered perspective.
背景:在 I 期肿瘤试验中纳入后补队列是最近开发的一种剂量优化策略。然而,疗效评估窗口期一般较长,导致确定无效剂量的工作滞后,更多的患者被回补到这些剂量。因此,有必要研究如何利用患者报告结果(PRO)来确定后补队列的剂量:方法:我们提出了一个统一的贝叶斯设计框架,称为 "回填-QoL",将患者报告的生活质量(QoL)数据用于具有回填队列的一期肿瘤试验,包括试验监测方法、剂量寻找算法和剂量选择标准。我们进行了模拟研究和敏感性分析,以评估拟议的 "回填-QoL "设计:模拟研究表明,Backfill-QoL 设计比传统的剂量扩展策略更有效,而且更少的患者会被分配到无法接受 QoL 资料的剂量上。我们开发了一个用户友好的 Windows 桌面应用程序,并免费提供给用户使用,以实现所提出的设计:Backfill-QoL设计可对安全性、疗效和QoL结果进行持续监测,并可从更以患者为中心的角度确定II期推荐剂量(RP2D)。
期刊介绍:
BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.